ᐅ Semi-detached house within a building plot measuring 8.5 m by 15 m (width x depth)

Created on: 20 May 2025 19:02
G
GregorBerger
Dear housebuilding forum,

After several years of searching, we have finally purchased a plot of land (with an existing building to be demolished) in our desired location. This also marks the end of my many years of purely passive participation in this forum. Since we were primarily looking for renovation projects rather than new builds, we naturally have some initial questions.

The plot, approximately 500 m² (5,400 sq ft), lies within the scope of a development plan that was last updated 20 years ago.

Basic data about the plot and development plan:
  • Building is permitted from 3 meters (10 ft) to 18 meters (59 ft) depth (so 15 m (49 ft) for the house)
  • After deducting setback areas, a width of 8.5 meters (28 ft) is possible
  • Slight slope across the building envelope with a rise of approximately 2.2 meters (7 ft)
  • 3 full floors permitted
  • Site occupancy index (ground coverage ratio) 0.4
  • Floor area ratio 1.2 (cannot be fully utilized due to the aforementioned building envelope)
  • Roof pitch 35–45°
  • Knee wall (dormer wall) height 60 cm (24 in)
  • Base (plinth) max. 60 cm (24 in) above the midpoint along the width of the access area, which is itself 30 cm (12 in) lower than the start of the building envelope
  • General residential zone
  • Open building style (detached buildings, no shared walls)
  • Covered terraces allowed up to 1.5 meters (5 ft) outside the building boundary, provided the site occupancy index is not exceeded
  • Roof indentations and structures permitted up to half the eaves length and at least 1 meter (3 ft) from the gable wall
  • Fencing with native hedges. Along the street, an additional fence up to 1.2 meters (4 ft) high is permitted.

The development plan places no restrictions on, among other things:
  • Building type
  • Number of residential units per building
  • Height limits
  • Basements
  • Parking spaces

The plan is to build a semi-detached house with another family. Both families have two children each and require two home offices, resulting in a need for six rooms per semi-detached unit. If we make progress here, I will create another thread in the floor plan forum and fill out the questionnaire.
Since the building envelope width of 8.5 meters (28 ft) is too narrow for semi-detached units side by side, they would have to be arranged one behind the other. Garden access and terraces would then be located on the narrow sides (one facing the street and one facing the main garden at the rear). This type of semi-detached house is quite rare. I have looked around in real life but have not found any examples. Only the Büdenbender semi-detached house Gemello SD 135 roughly corresponds to this layout (though not to the measurements).

I have had some informal discussions with an architect I know (who now only works on office buildings) and the building authority, without encountering any fundamental contradictions so far.

I have already applied the @11ant basement rule, according to which a basement seems obligatory because there is more than 2 meters (7 ft) of height difference within the building envelope. However, I do not understand how this relates to the “base (plinth)” restriction of max. 60 cm (24 in) in the development plan. My layperson assumption would be that one floor (the ground floor? the lowest residential floor? the lowest full floor?) may start a maximum of 60 cm (24 in) above street level.

My first questions for you:
  • Are you familiar with similar houses, possibly with names for Googling or similar?
  • Would you approach this topic differently?
  • What does the rule about the base (plinth) mean?

Thank you in advance,
Gregor
Black-and-white floor plan with interior walls, dimension lines, and labels
G
GregorBerger
22 May 2025 11:06
hanghaus2023 schrieb:

I have adjusted this slightly to match reality.
I would place the first entrance 20cm (8 inches) higher than the street level and the second one 60cm (24 inches) higher.

That’s an interesting approach I hadn’t considered before. Thanks! What are the reasons against raising the rear (here: right) half enough so that you can access the garden on the same level?
Or in other words: From which floor and how do you enter the garden at the rear gable side?
K
kbt09
22 May 2025 11:11
@hanghaus2023 ... could you add some dimensions to your floor plan? Also, weren’t two offices required?
11ant22 May 2025 11:13
ypg schrieb:

Many things are possible.
In the most daring case, even an asymmetrical gable roof with the ridge over the rear half (and somewhat like a shed roof over the front), in order to raise the rear part by one floor...
GregorBerger schrieb:

Maybe it gets annoying in the long run to say thank you each time. But I am really impressed! In some other forums, there is the option to "buy a coffee" for other members. It’s a pity that this is not possible here. How can one show their appreciation?
Officially, there are not even other forums here yet. For me, saying thanks works via PayPal.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
11ant22 May 2025 11:21
GregorBerger schrieb:

However, I did not ask about a division running strictly parallel to the street,

That would be completely unrealistic; for the size of the house, “bowling alley” wouldn’t even begin to describe it.
GregorBerger schrieb:

But rather a flagpole or hammer-shaped lot with a private access driveway 3m (10 feet) wide. At that moment, the previously positive mood in the conversation turned abruptly. I probably stirred up a hornet’s nest.

Not a hornet’s nest, but I would have looked completely stunned. Because at least up to halfway along the flagpole, there would have to be a side setback maintained. Such a division would already mutilate the lot.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
H
hanghaus2023
22 May 2025 11:23
GregorBerger schrieb:

That’s an interesting approach that I hadn’t considered before. Thanks! Is there any reason not to raise the rear (in this case: right) half enough so that you can walk out to the garden at ground level?
Or, put differently: From which floor and how do you access the garden at the rear gable side?

I actually sketched that option first. However, I’m not sure if the base height might work against it. In any case, it’s a possible approach.

Breakfast terrace at the setback area, level with the ground floor. Secure the area toward the neighbor with L-shaped retaining walls. If there is a site elevation plan, more detailed planning would be possible. Photos of the property are also quite helpful.
H
hanghaus2023
22 May 2025 11:29
kbt09 schrieb:
@hanghaus2023 ... could you add some dimensions to your floor plan? And weren’t two offices required?
Too much work. Outside dimensions are 7.5 by 8.5 m (24.6 by 27.9 ft). The second office can also be accommodated in the attic.