ᐅ Sell the entire property or opt for a partial sale with reinvestment?

Created on: 10 Jun 2018 13:41
K
kaho674
There is a large property in the family located in the center of Dresden. It is a residential area—surrounded by 6-story or even taller new apartment buildings. The land is currently occupied by a very old factory building. The owners do not have the funds to demolish this building and replace it with modern new construction. On the other hand, the ongoing costs and rental income are just about breaking even. If income continues to decline, the property could financially ruin the family.

So the question is what should happen with this "factory land." It is quite certain that it could be completely redeveloped since there are multi-family buildings all around. Adjacent to this land is the family’s own business property (including land), which is not intended to be sold as it is their livelihood.

The immediate idea was, of course, to sell the entire factory land. Its value is estimated at around 1-2 million (minus demolition costs), without going into details here. The money could be taken, divided among the family, and essentially spent without long-term benefit.

However, there are also grandchildren who are struggling to establish themselves in Dresden. The family would like to support them over the long term and believes that a rental property would be ideal. Coincidentally, the grandchildren are trained in property management and could help oversee the project.

So the idea came up to sell only part of the land to gain liquidity, demolish the old building, and construct a multi-family house—ideally in collaboration with an investor who would buy and develop the other half. Of course, everything would need to be carefully calculated to see if this is feasible and if the land will generate enough value.

Is something like this possible, or is it just a scam? What would you do?
N
nordanney
9 Oct 2018 13:30
kaho674 schrieb:
Or are there any ideas on how to use something like this sensibly in an apartment?

Drop the ceiling to 3m (9.8 ft) and possibly install recessed spotlights. A ceiling height of 240cm (7 ft 10 in) is no longer standard; 280cm (9 ft 2 in) is now the minimum required for high-quality apartments (and those who have this height even in "regular" apartments will enjoy the spacious feeling).

Otherwise, this height is ideal for micro-apartments or student housing. There are great concepts for designing the apartment as a "two-level" space.
kaho6749 Oct 2018 13:36
The problem is that we are actually aiming to offer apartments between 60-70m² (645-750 sq ft). Even 50m² (540 sq ft) is conceivable for seniors. In such spaces, a ceiling height of 3.80m (12.5 ft) feels like a railway station. So, it would probably come down to lowering the ceiling by about 1m (3.3 ft), which is really a shame.
S
Spunk
9 Oct 2018 13:52
Micro-apartments or student apartments could look like this, but is the height sufficient?

What is the distance from the top edge of the window to the ceiling?

Moderne Loftwohnung mit offener Küche, Arbeitsbereich und Sofa im Wohnzimmer.
kaho6749 Oct 2018 14:02
I think that is too tight for this.
11ant9 Oct 2018 23:00
kaho674 schrieb:
The consultant said that ground-floor apartments are difficult or even impossible to rent out.

The elevation is the least exposed to light, and a raised ground floor is noticeably more attractive to burglars than a ground-level apartment.
kaho674 schrieb:
Could barrier-free construction be possible here, reserving ground-level units for people with disabilities? Or is that also not desired there?

Accessibility is more than just step-free entry, and having a wheelchair user does not cause an aversion to a penthouse view.
kaho674 schrieb:
that we actually aim to offer apartments between 60-70m² (645-750 sq ft).

What is the reason behind this preference?
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
kaho67410 Oct 2018 08:27
11ant schrieb:

What is the reason behind this preference?
Money.
The discussion is about dividing the floor area (680m² (7319 ft²) gross) into 8 or 6 housing units. The first option would result in smaller apartments of about 60m² (645 ft²) each and would likely be more profitable. The second option would mean larger units. A mix over 4 floors could also be possible.