I own a small house with a living area of 80 m² (860 sq ft). Due to poor structural condition, the house is to be demolished and rebuilt on the same site with the same footprint. The nearly 500 m² (5400 sq ft) plot only contains the house, a single garage, a double garage, and a paved driveway/turnaround area in front of the garages. This means about 80% of the plot is covered with impermeable surfaces.
According to a phone inquiry with the building authority, either 40% or 60% impermeable surface coverage would be permitted. There is no grandfathering of the existing situation. This means I either have to demolish the garages, which are very solidly built and I do not want to remove, or I have to remove the paved driveway, resulting in driving over bare soil to reach the garages.
Since I already have a 40 m (130 ft) long driveway and there are rarely free parking spots on the street where the driveway connects, I cannot do without the garage.
Does anyone know if there might be further exceptions, or do I really have to plan on driving through mud to reach my garage?
According to a phone inquiry with the building authority, either 40% or 60% impermeable surface coverage would be permitted. There is no grandfathering of the existing situation. This means I either have to demolish the garages, which are very solidly built and I do not want to remove, or I have to remove the paved driveway, resulting in driving over bare soil to reach the garages.
Since I already have a 40 m (130 ft) long driveway and there are rarely free parking spots on the street where the driveway connects, I cannot do without the garage.
Does anyone know if there might be further exceptions, or do I really have to plan on driving through mud to reach my garage?
M
MachsSelbst4 Jun 2024 19:5580% is really extreme. It might be acceptable for a 300m² (3,230 sq ft) plot, but sealing 400 out of 500m² (5,382 sq ft) is excessive.
This is especially problematic regarding heavy rainfall, which is unfortunately a very relevant issue right now.
This is especially problematic regarding heavy rainfall, which is unfortunately a very relevant issue right now.
To answer the question: No, exceeding the limit is not allowed. That’s exactly what the regulation is for.
Usually, impermeable surfaces (unlike stormwater fees) are calculated as either 0 or 1.
Options:
- Remove garages (there are also options to park the vehicle on your own property without having multiple garages)
- Remove the turning area (backing out instead)
- Unpaved driveway (some potential variants have already been mentioned here)
However, how a house with 80 m² (860 sq ft) of living space results in 400 m² (4,300 sq ft) of impermeable surface is beyond me... Does the property consist of 300 m² (3,230 sq ft) driveway and garages?
Usually, impermeable surfaces (unlike stormwater fees) are calculated as either 0 or 1.
Options:
- Remove garages (there are also options to park the vehicle on your own property without having multiple garages)
- Remove the turning area (backing out instead)
- Unpaved driveway (some potential variants have already been mentioned here)
However, how a house with 80 m² (860 sq ft) of living space results in 400 m² (4,300 sq ft) of impermeable surface is beyond me... Does the property consist of 300 m² (3,230 sq ft) driveway and garages?
Similar topics