S
sauerpeter29 Nov 2016 10:06Bauexperte schrieb:
Why would you do that, especially since it is no longer cheaper than a traditional timber roof frame?
Regards, BauexperteThat was just an example; I’m not specifically attached to a trussed roof or anything. Somehow, I actually tend to prefer roof structures like the one shown in the picture I provided above. Based on what you’ve said, I assume that trussed roofs used to be more cost-effective but that this has more or less evened out now? And that a trussed roof costs about the same as a traditional purlin roof frame?
S
sauerpeter29 Nov 2016 11:15RobsonMKK schrieb:
No, a truss roof is cheaper. Can you give an approximate difference in cost? Just so there’s a rough idea. Of course, it probably depends on the region, but it’s only meant as a general reference. Maybe the difference is so large that it doesn’t fit the budget at all.
We don’t plan to convert the attic into living space, but for storage purposes, a traditional rafter roof structure would be much better than a truss roof with all those wooden beams.
B
Bieber081529 Nov 2016 21:49Bauexperte schrieb:
I never understood why homeowners like to install so much timber under the roof This is one of those points I only understood after seeing it completed. (No one told me beforehand, and since I wasn’t familiar with the truss roof, I didn’t realize the roof structure should be questioned.)