ᐅ Roof tiles: Clay or concrete – Do clay tiles really last that much longer?

Hello,

things are getting serious now—the first small step toward renovation is about to begin, and we are currently collecting quotes from roofing contractors.

I keep encountering the question of clay tile versus concrete tile. We are currently requesting quotes for clay tiles because that was the original choice, but personally, it bothers me (as always) that, in my opinion, the alternative has not been explored thoroughly enough.

Appearance does not matter here. Only what makes the most sense so that, in the end, it is the most cost-effective solution. And if applicable, we should also consider what kind of “maintenance effort” the roof will require over time.

I am hearing different things. Some say clay and concrete have about the same durability nowadays. That concrete tiles are now just as good. Elsewhere, people say clay lasts easily 10–20 years longer. Then, clay is said to be a few thousand euros more expensive (but supposedly lasts 10–20 years longer).

Concrete is said to visually age faster because moss or similar growth can form quicker. As long as this only affects appearance, we don’t mind. It would only be relevant to us if we had to remove such growth regularly.

I’m trying to absorb what roofing contractors are trying to sell me and what I can read online. Unfortunately, the more I hear and read, the less I seem to understand.

I would therefore be very grateful for your experiences and opinions.

And I would be even more grateful if no one would tear me apart or be unfriendly because I have too little knowledge or should have informed myself beforehand, etc. It’s very complicated here (shared property ownership, seriously ill people involved, discussions, etc.). There actually was no renovation planned for the near future.

I would very much appreciate a friendly, factual, and helpful exchange and would be very thankful for that.

Best regards