ᐅ Renovation of an Existing Property – Our Journey to a Home
Created on: 13 Jun 2019 14:38
L
LordNibbler
Since returning to Wolfsburg in 2017, we had been searching for a property. Initially, we rented to take our time finding the right house and to test the real estate agents.
Of course, properties meeting these criteria were expensive and scarcely available. The first viewings were disappointing:
Then, at the beginning of 2018, an offer came up that didn’t fully meet our criteria but was in the same neighborhood.



The house was actually larger than we needed, but the structure and architecture were excellent. Renovations were manageable (utility lines easily accessible, partly in shafts), and the leasehold was acceptable because the owners had prepaid their installments (there was a discount), so the annual fee was only 500€ (~$540). The leaseholder is the city of Wolfsburg, which by statute only raises interest rates upon resale (not during the lease term or inheritance). When purchasing the plot, the land value is calculated by the benchmark land value minus the redemption amount and with a 15% discount. In mid-2017, the offer for the land was therefore 118,000€ (~$128,000) (with today’s benchmark land value it would be about 150,000€ (~$162,000)). This was a bargain for the area and was included in the asking price according to the agent.
Still, after a second viewing with experts (not appraisers), we found enough arguments (wall crack, renovation needs) to negotiate the price down to 420,000€. The public offer was then reduced to 435,000€ (~$470,000).
A financing broker secured approval from the local savings bank (Sparkasse) for the mortgage (leasehold is a bit special here, mostly local banks are familiar). It was feasible as a 20-year full repayment loan (leasehold agreement had to be valid for at least another 10 years), with a potential buffer to save up the land price.
But there was one issue: the over-90-year-old occupant. She was looking for an apartment in a senior residence (ground floor, lake view). Every week we heard it was only a matter of days until one would become available. In the end, by mid-April, we had a reservation with ownership transfer no later than December, possibly sooner. So we committed to financing and arranged the notary appointment...
...and then a week later, there was a request for a meeting (bypassing the notary). The niece and sister explained that the reservation was declared invalid. The time pressure was too great. It wasn’t certain the apartment would be available yet. They felt the elderly woman couldn’t be expected to move into a care home. They wanted a purchase contract with more time — about a year (implicitly without a strict limit).
We only had 6 months interest-free financing extension, but could imagine a few more months. However, only with financial compensation (1,500€/month rental cost difference). The counterproposal was to buy as planned but with ownership transfer only after the occupant moves out (essentially the right to live there). This was not acceptable (due to hardship rules; in the end you own the house but cannot evict the old resident). The only outcome was an informal understanding: we remained interested, please inform us when the senior residence is arranged; if we find something else in the meantime we will get back to you. The agent (VR-Bank) was not very pleased since it had been difficult to get the three women to agree before. It wasn’t her fault; the dossier was the best prepared with all necessary documents and missing items obtained promptly.
Two weeks later there was another interested party. Moral of the story: we successfully lowered the price for others but they moved in in October 2017.
Here are some floor plans of the property as inspiration for other house planners:

The agent mentioned that in the residential area, maybe one property sells every 1–2 years. The rest are sold privately. Since we moved in, three houses have been demolished and replaced by new builds twice the size. Another is still a shell and is receiving a huge extension. None of these properties were publicly marketed...
...the search continues in the next post and how we finally found our home.

- detached single-family house (so no semi-detached houses)
- within walking distance to the city centers of Wolfsburg, Fallersleben, or Vorsfelde
- for existing buildings, construction year from 1960 onwards, even if not renovated, as long as the structure justifies investment (otherwise you pay for poor renovations that need to be redone)
- for new builds, located in a residential area with a coherent design concept (many new developments unfortunately look like model home neighborhoods where every option from the catalog has been used, but without creating a harmonious living environment)
- a larger garden with usable space
- no leasehold (common in this area)
Of course, properties meeting these criteria were expensive and scarcely available. The first viewings were disappointing:
- 5-year-old house in a new development: walls with cracks, water stains (from the foundation slab), unoccupied, agent said normal settlement cracks (but wrong direction and too large), suspected upward ground movement due to Posidonia shale underground according to the land use plan and construction errors
- 8-year-old house in the same development: not legally divided plot (3 houses on 2 plots), agent claimed legal division (sent documents with condominium declaration), neighborhood dispute (not ideal in a condominium under self-management)
- 1950s development house: severe moisture problems in the basement including mold, agent already had an offer for exterior waterproofing (franchise concept with suction lance) which was not expensive, basement height under 1.8m (5 feet 11 inches), so not usable
- 1950s development house: sold after only 2 years (hidden defects?), superficial renovation (cosmetic upgrades but original substructure)
- several other houses that left little impression (location, layout, quality, price not suitable)
Then, at the beginning of 2018, an offer came up that didn’t fully meet our criteria but was in the same neighborhood.
- built mid-1958
- very high-quality construction and workmanship for the time
- architect-designed house (engineer) for a medical professional (MD)
- hillside location, split-level, integrated garage
- district heating with concealed convectors
- well maintained, so renovation was minimal (bathroom tiled + ceramics, new roof 2002, new windows 1995)
- well-kept garden, granite paving
- 165m² (1,776 sq ft) living space + 40m² (430 sq ft) utility space
- 905m² (9,740 sq ft) leasehold plot at a dead-end street
- 493,000 €
The house was actually larger than we needed, but the structure and architecture were excellent. Renovations were manageable (utility lines easily accessible, partly in shafts), and the leasehold was acceptable because the owners had prepaid their installments (there was a discount), so the annual fee was only 500€ (~$540). The leaseholder is the city of Wolfsburg, which by statute only raises interest rates upon resale (not during the lease term or inheritance). When purchasing the plot, the land value is calculated by the benchmark land value minus the redemption amount and with a 15% discount. In mid-2017, the offer for the land was therefore 118,000€ (~$128,000) (with today’s benchmark land value it would be about 150,000€ (~$162,000)). This was a bargain for the area and was included in the asking price according to the agent.
Still, after a second viewing with experts (not appraisers), we found enough arguments (wall crack, renovation needs) to negotiate the price down to 420,000€. The public offer was then reduced to 435,000€ (~$470,000).
A financing broker secured approval from the local savings bank (Sparkasse) for the mortgage (leasehold is a bit special here, mostly local banks are familiar). It was feasible as a 20-year full repayment loan (leasehold agreement had to be valid for at least another 10 years), with a potential buffer to save up the land price.
But there was one issue: the over-90-year-old occupant. She was looking for an apartment in a senior residence (ground floor, lake view). Every week we heard it was only a matter of days until one would become available. In the end, by mid-April, we had a reservation with ownership transfer no later than December, possibly sooner. So we committed to financing and arranged the notary appointment...
...and then a week later, there was a request for a meeting (bypassing the notary). The niece and sister explained that the reservation was declared invalid. The time pressure was too great. It wasn’t certain the apartment would be available yet. They felt the elderly woman couldn’t be expected to move into a care home. They wanted a purchase contract with more time — about a year (implicitly without a strict limit).
We only had 6 months interest-free financing extension, but could imagine a few more months. However, only with financial compensation (1,500€/month rental cost difference). The counterproposal was to buy as planned but with ownership transfer only after the occupant moves out (essentially the right to live there). This was not acceptable (due to hardship rules; in the end you own the house but cannot evict the old resident). The only outcome was an informal understanding: we remained interested, please inform us when the senior residence is arranged; if we find something else in the meantime we will get back to you. The agent (VR-Bank) was not very pleased since it had been difficult to get the three women to agree before. It wasn’t her fault; the dossier was the best prepared with all necessary documents and missing items obtained promptly.
Two weeks later there was another interested party. Moral of the story: we successfully lowered the price for others but they moved in in October 2017.
Here are some floor plans of the property as inspiration for other house planners:
The agent mentioned that in the residential area, maybe one property sells every 1–2 years. The rest are sold privately. Since we moved in, three houses have been demolished and replaced by new builds twice the size. Another is still a shell and is receiving a huge extension. None of these properties were publicly marketed...
...the search continues in the next post and how we finally found our home.
My official opinion fully agrees with you – my experience contradicts this: it is more likely for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a network documentation to clearly show which subcontractor in which year failed to install this TAE with the PPA.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
LordNibbler schrieb:
The main project in the basement will be to replace the soil pipe leading to the guest restroom. For now, only in the basement and without having to open anything inside the restroom itself.A brief update on the past few months. With a child in the house, progress is a bit slower, but it continues.
First, the wastewater pipe in the "boiler room" is being addressed. As shown, the corner is already very damp and the cast iron pipe is heavily corroded. After exposing it, the following condition was revealed:
The wall thickness was minimal, and two holes immediately formed. To work more easily, I broke up the floor up to the next socket.
The next day, the jackhammer quickly dealt with the stoneware pipe, and the cast iron part was cleared as well. It is clearly visible how little of the pipe wall remains.
Then, a construction dehumidifier was used to reduce some of the moisture.
The corner area’s foundation was not fully formed and was also damaged by moisture.
This was backfilled, and a gravel bed was laid to support the new drainage pipe (KG pipe).
In the end, all pipes were installed and the floor was closed back up.
The connection going upstairs is still temporary, as the guest restroom still needs renovation.
LordNibbler schrieb:
Just for comparison, here’s what others are doing in the residential area:

Here is an update from the other construction site in the neighborhood:
The entire pitched roof on the upper floor and half of the ground floor were demolished and partially rebuilt on a larger footprint.
In the hallway, the sliding door has received a side panel until the carpenter has time and materials to install a proper door frame.
(29.12.2019)
During the removal of wallpaper, repositioning of the living room door, and renewal of electrical wiring, some areas of the hallway walls were damaged. These have only been replastered so far.
(23.02.2020)
With wallpaper (and shortly after, paint), the work behind it is hardly visible anymore.
(01.03.2020)
During the removal of wallpaper, repositioning of the living room door, and renewal of electrical wiring, some areas of the hallway walls were damaged. These have only been replastered so far.
With wallpaper (and shortly after, paint), the work behind it is hardly visible anymore.
By the end of the year, the garden looked like a battleground. After most of the hazelnut remnants were cleared, the soil was slightly leveled and the compost was removed.
(24.12.2019)
(31.12.2019)
At the end of March, the entire lawn was scarified.
(28.03.2020)
Currently, a tool shed is being built so that the patio area and the shed by the garage can be demolished:
(15.06.2020)

At the end of March, the entire lawn was scarified.
Currently, a tool shed is being built so that the patio area and the shed by the garage can be demolished:
The basement windows were due for replacement. Until now, they had been made of metal and single-glazed. Over the years, they had become drafty and partly rusted. After removing the "window sills" (concrete slopes), the situation for measuring for the window installer was as follows.
(09.05.2020)
The stained glass window by the stairs was removed.
(08.08.2020)
The missing sand-lime bricks were rebuilt (@11ant: please ignore the overlap measurement):
(16.05.2020)
I’m not sure what exactly the window installer measured, but why sometimes more and sometimes fewer profile extensions were included remains a mystery. We had also explicitly offered to remove the windows before his measurements to allow for the largest possible glass area structurally.
In the end, for visual balance, we added a pseudo lintel (plastered aerated concrete block attached to the ceiling):
(09.06.2020)
The two rebuilt windows received window sills:

The stained glass window by the stairs was removed.
The missing sand-lime bricks were rebuilt (@11ant: please ignore the overlap measurement):
I’m not sure what exactly the window installer measured, but why sometimes more and sometimes fewer profile extensions were included remains a mystery. We had also explicitly offered to remove the windows before his measurements to allow for the largest possible glass area structurally.
In the end, for visual balance, we added a pseudo lintel (plastered aerated concrete block attached to the ceiling):
The two rebuilt windows received window sills:
Similar topics