ᐅ Renovating an Old Roof or Upgrading Interior Insulation? A Guide for Homes Built Around 1920

Created on: 23 Dec 2025 17:02
S
SebastianHe
S
SebastianHe
23 Dec 2025 17:02
Dear Forum,

We are planning to buy a semi-detached house built around 1920 with an extension from the 1960s.
Below are a few drawings/pictures related to the roof:

Sketchy cross-sectional view of a multi-story shell construction with a construction crane.

Front view of a single-family house with a gable roof, brown window frames, and solar panels.

Several close-up shots of different roofs with red roof tiles, eaves, and gutters.

Interior photo: living room corner with table, sofa, window; bedroom with lamp.

Incomplete roof structure in shell construction with blue tarp and brick walls.

Interior view of attic with wooden floor and insulation; moss on roof tiles.


Close-up of a hand touching blue sealing foil on a construction site surface.


From an energy perspective, I want to invest something and will have an individual building energy assessment (iSFP) done.
Our budget is limited, otherwise we would probably do everything.
My thoughts:
- Roof: Either renew insulation between rafters plus internal insulation, or completely renovate the roof after, for example, 4–5 years (see another forum post).

Current rough estimates for a full roof renovation are about 70,000€ (which is not really within our budget).
I will soon visit a carpenter to assess various things.
I fear the evaluation might say something like:
“Your planned internal insulation can be done, but due to the complexity it won’t achieve the insulation effect you want...”

Others say the tiles still look good and the "Biberschwanz" tiles (beaver tail tiles) can last a very long time. Unfortunately, I don’t know how old the current tiles are.
Also, some years ago, insulation of the attic and probably the sloped ceiling on the second floor was done with about 15–20cm (6–8 inches) of glass wool (?).

What do you think?
Is it worth investing in renewing only the internal insulation (< 15,000€), leave the rest as is, or is it better to tackle the whole roof eventually?
In this context, would you remove the ceiling between the attic and the second floor to make internal insulation easier and gain ceiling height (+1.5m (5 ft)), or would the thermal disadvantages be higher with just renewed internal insulation?

Thank you and best regards,
Sebastian
11ant23 Dec 2025 18:15
SebastianHe schrieb:

We are going to buy a semi-detached house built in 1920 with an extension from the 1960s.
Below are a few drawings/images related to the roof:

The details are hard to see (and even harder to recognize) in these thumbnail collages.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
J
Joedreck
25 Dec 2025 09:28
The entirely new roof with continuous insulation above the rafters is obviously better, as you can build everything according to current standards at once.
I don’t understand why the EL option should cost 15k.
Study the necessary technical knowledge, double up the rafters, add mass to the roof, and go for it.
S
SebastianHe
27 Dec 2025 19:06
Yes, that works, thanks. That is the maximum budget I want to allocate for this. I am currently trying to estimate what the different measures might cost me. I think 15,000 (fifteen thousand) will be quite generous with a lot of personal effort, but if most of the work is outsourced, it might not be too much.
S
SebastianHe
29 Dec 2025 19:00
Here are a few pictures in better quality:

- The roof has an area of about 120m² (1,290 sq ft).

IMG_2833.JPG"]94572[/ATTACH]<br />
[ATTACH type="full

Attic with red brick wall, blue vapor barrier, and wooden beams in the shell construction phase

Top view of a roof with moss growth on terracotta roof tiles, cars in the background

Close-up of moss growth on old roof tiles with a cable at the edge.

Red tiled roof with worn tiles and window with roller shutter