Hello everyone,
I would like to ask for your suggestions on how to divide the attached plot of land into two equal parts.
The plot measures just over 900 sqm (about 9,688 sq ft). It should be physically divided into two equal sections and developed by two families who are friends.
On the left side (southwest), there is a ditch next to the plot and a road beyond that. At the bottom (southeast), there is also a road.
The dashed line indicates the building area, which is determined by a 3 m (10 ft) setback from the property boundary and a 6 m (20 ft) non-buildable strip facing the road.
Access is from the road at the bottom (southeast).
Unfortunately, the plot is somewhat irregular in shape. We have tried many options already, but I would appreciate unbiased suggestions.
I look forward to your proposals.
I would like to ask for your suggestions on how to divide the attached plot of land into two equal parts.
The plot measures just over 900 sqm (about 9,688 sq ft). It should be physically divided into two equal sections and developed by two families who are friends.
On the left side (southwest), there is a ditch next to the plot and a road beyond that. At the bottom (southeast), there is also a road.
The dashed line indicates the building area, which is determined by a 3 m (10 ft) setback from the property boundary and a 6 m (20 ft) non-buildable strip facing the road.
Access is from the road at the bottom (southeast).
Unfortunately, the plot is somewhat irregular in shape. We have tried many options already, but I would appreciate unbiased suggestions.
I look forward to your proposals.
Hello DNL,
yes, there are additional suggestions – and with all due respect – they significantly contradict Wastl’s statement.
The subdivision should definitely (!!) be carried out based on the planned construction, meaning the surveyor and architect must work closely together. Otherwise, you will face major issues with the building process or setback regulations and/or will not be able to use the plots optimally.
I can immediately connect you with a professional colleague in HB, with whom I regularly collaborate. Just send me a short private message, and I will be happy to make the introduction.
Best regards
Dirk Grafe
yes, there are additional suggestions – and with all due respect – they significantly contradict Wastl’s statement.
The subdivision should definitely (!!) be carried out based on the planned construction, meaning the surveyor and architect must work closely together. Otherwise, you will face major issues with the building process or setback regulations and/or will not be able to use the plots optimally.
I can immediately connect you with a professional colleague in HB, with whom I regularly collaborate. Just send me a short private message, and I will be happy to make the introduction.
Best regards
Dirk Grafe
Hello,
At first, I thought Wastl’s suggestion was good – then Dirk Grafe’s post came along: he is right, it doesn’t seem optimal because with the new subdivision, new setback distances of 3 meters (10 feet) each will apply again. This could make a desired building – whether square or rectangular in shape – somewhat difficult.
You also have to consider that with 450 sqm (4,843 sqft), there are not many options available.
Are 450 sqm (4,843 sqft) independent plots allowed where you are? In our municipality, there is a minimum size requirement of 650 sqm (7,000 sqft); otherwise, only a notional subdivision or semi-detached housing is possible.
As a layperson speaking to another layperson, I would suggest marking the plot with a drawn line plus two times 3 meters (10 feet) setback (as required) and trying to fit two standard houses on it. That way, you can see the problem more clearly.
At first, I thought Wastl’s suggestion was good – then Dirk Grafe’s post came along: he is right, it doesn’t seem optimal because with the new subdivision, new setback distances of 3 meters (10 feet) each will apply again. This could make a desired building – whether square or rectangular in shape – somewhat difficult.
You also have to consider that with 450 sqm (4,843 sqft), there are not many options available.
Are 450 sqm (4,843 sqft) independent plots allowed where you are? In our municipality, there is a minimum size requirement of 650 sqm (7,000 sqft); otherwise, only a notional subdivision or semi-detached housing is possible.
As a layperson speaking to another layperson, I would suggest marking the plot with a drawn line plus two times 3 meters (10 feet) setback (as required) and trying to fit two standard houses on it. That way, you can see the problem more clearly.
Thank you very much for the advice.
Unfortunately, we have a problem with the subdivision because the plot does not belong to us yet, but to a group of heirs. They want to sell the property as soon as possible and do not want to wait until we have carefully worked out with the architect exactly what kind of houses and how they will be positioned, as we do not want to rush this process either.
We have also discussed this with the lawyer/notary who will prepare the purchase contract. While we could sign the contract before the subdivision is finalized, if I understand correctly, the deed of conveyance will only be signed once the subdivision is complete, and only then will the payment be made to the sellers. I hope I have understood and explained this correctly.
Can someone tell me what the allowable minimum plot sizes are in this area? Is the building authority the right contact for this? The neighboring plots are smaller, but that does not necessarily mean much.
We have already drawn up the boundaries with setback distances and marked standard houses. But sometimes your own perspective is limited, so I am hoping for some creative suggestions here.
Unfortunately, we have a problem with the subdivision because the plot does not belong to us yet, but to a group of heirs. They want to sell the property as soon as possible and do not want to wait until we have carefully worked out with the architect exactly what kind of houses and how they will be positioned, as we do not want to rush this process either.
We have also discussed this with the lawyer/notary who will prepare the purchase contract. While we could sign the contract before the subdivision is finalized, if I understand correctly, the deed of conveyance will only be signed once the subdivision is complete, and only then will the payment be made to the sellers. I hope I have understood and explained this correctly.
Can someone tell me what the allowable minimum plot sizes are in this area? Is the building authority the right contact for this? The neighboring plots are smaller, but that does not necessarily mean much.
We have already drawn up the boundaries with setback distances and marked standard houses. But sometimes your own perspective is limited, so I am hoping for some creative suggestions here.
Similar topics