ᐅ Ridge direction: parallel to the street or at a 90-degree angle?

Created on: 22 Oct 2024 23:31
U
UnfähigerBeamt
Hello,

the development plan for our building area does not specify the ridge direction. It only defines the buildable area on the plot (building boundary). Our plot is not a regular rectangular shape but an irregular one (see image). The inner dashed line represents the setback area. The road runs along the southern edge (at the bottom), where the driveway is also located. The detailed development plan does not mention any ridge direction requirements. This is also reflected by the existing houses, where the ridge does not always point in the same direction.

Because of the irregular shape of the plot, we wanted to position our house at an angle to make the best use of the south/west-facing area. Suddenly, a guy from the district office says no, a house always has to be parallel or perpendicular (90 degrees) to the street. He said he cannot approve an angle of about 70 degrees. I cannot find any information about this anywhere. Our architect was also unaware of this, as the development plan does not contain any such details, so it was assumed that within the building boundary, we could rotate and position the house as we like. Now I am a bit speechless. Has anyone ever heard of such a “rule,” or was that guy just having a bad day?

If this really stands, it will be very difficult for us to orient the house or design the floor plan 🙁
Ground plan of a building: contour with a rounded corner at the bottom right, entrance on the left, north at the top.

Hand-drawn sketch of the plot on graph paper: outer boundary, building, north arrow, entrance, street.
H
hanghaus2023
23 Oct 2024 15:21
Note: The statutory text contains further provisions.
+
Could you also upload the development plan?

Is there a cadastral extract available?

Somehow, I can’t find the 30 m (98 feet) at the west boundary in the zoning plan.

Is your plot #9?
Y
ypg
27 Oct 2024 10:20
@UnfähigerBeamt has left the group, uh, the thread.
For your information: The drawing is just an example. Construction can also be done differently.
11ant27 Oct 2024 15:35
UnfähigerBeamt schrieb:

The house will actually be positioned at about 70 degrees, not at 90 degrees or parallel. After consulting with the local authority and the head of the case officer at the district office, it became clear that his initial opinion was simply incorrect, and he has since revised his statements. Now the house can be positioned as desired.

I have to agree with Yvonne; this information could have been shared here as well.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
U
UnfähigerBeamt
28 Oct 2024 13:39
So, back again!

Yes, I would have, and I certainly would have done it. Been very busy.
11ant28 Oct 2024 13:57
UnfähigerBeamt schrieb:

After consulting with the municipality and the head of the case officer at the district administration office, it turned out that his view was simply incorrect and he has revised his statements.

Then you could change your username to "InsightfulOfficer" now.
hanghaus2023 schrieb:

I would really appreciate it if you could bring some structure to your questions. Constantly jumping from one post to the next is very exhausting.
UnfähigerBeamt schrieb:

This thread can be closed.

Uh, no, letting the main thread fall silent would probably not help with better clarity.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Y
ypg
28 Oct 2024 16:22
UnfähigerBeamt schrieb:

So, back again!

Yes, and? Why don’t you explain the situation here?
UnfähigerBeamt schrieb:

I would have and probably did.

If only, if only, said the bicycle chain.
UnfähigerBeamt schrieb:

Got a lot on my plate.

Yes, and the responders aren’t paid for being polite either.