ᐅ Garage Location on the Property, Requirements in the Development Plan (Building Permit / Planning Permission)
Created on: 25 Jun 2023 21:02
A
Alexander_
Hello everyone,
In our development plan, the location drawing roughly indicates the position of the house and garage. For better south/west orientation, we would prefer to place the garage on the right side of the house instead of on the left. Before commissioning a homebuilder, we would like to know if this is possible. The text section of the development plan does not specify any restrictions on this. Perhaps there are forum members with experience in such changes/deviations from the development plan (plot 78).
Development Plan / Restrictions
Plot size – 600 sqm (6,458 sq ft)
Slope – 1.8 m (5.9 ft) height difference over 30 m (98 ft)
Site coverage ratio – 0.35
Floor area ratio – 0.5
Building envelope, building line, and boundary – see development plan
Border development – permitted for garages
Number of parking spaces – double garage desired
Number of floors – 2
Roof type – pitched roof
Architectural style – urban villa
Orientation – see development plan
Maximum heights / limits – see development plan
Other specifications – none
Owners’ Requirements
Architectural style, roof type, building type – urban villa with pitched roof
Basement, number of floors – no basement
Number of occupants, age – 2
Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor – 70 sqm (753 sq ft), 70 sqm (753 sq ft)
Office: family use or home office? – guest room
Guests per year – once per month
Open or closed architecture – partially open
Conservative or modern design – modern
Open kitchen, kitchen island – yes
Number of dining seats – 6
Fireplace – no
Music/sound wall – no
Balcony, roof terrace – no
Garage, carport – 6 x 9 m (20 x 30 ft)
Utility garden, greenhouse – only hedge and lawn area
Others – no special wishes or requirements, no daily routine, happy to explain why certain features are or are not wanted – none
House Design
Who designed it:
- Planner from a construction company – own plan / prefab house provider
- Architect – not yet appointed
- Do-it-yourself – no
What do you particularly like? Why? – passage from house to garage
What do you not like? Why? –
Price estimate according to architect/planner: open
Personal price limit for the house, including fittings: open
Preferred heating technology: district heating
If you have to give up on which details/extras
- can you do without: external venetian blinds (shutters)
- cannot do without: garage
Why is the design the way it is now? For example:
Standard design from the planner? Partly
Which wishes were implemented by the architect? Yes
A mixture of many examples from various magazines? Yes
What makes it particularly good or bad in your eyes? – tailored to our needs
In our development plan, the location drawing roughly indicates the position of the house and garage. For better south/west orientation, we would prefer to place the garage on the right side of the house instead of on the left. Before commissioning a homebuilder, we would like to know if this is possible. The text section of the development plan does not specify any restrictions on this. Perhaps there are forum members with experience in such changes/deviations from the development plan (plot 78).
Development Plan / Restrictions
Plot size – 600 sqm (6,458 sq ft)
Slope – 1.8 m (5.9 ft) height difference over 30 m (98 ft)
Site coverage ratio – 0.35
Floor area ratio – 0.5
Building envelope, building line, and boundary – see development plan
Border development – permitted for garages
Number of parking spaces – double garage desired
Number of floors – 2
Roof type – pitched roof
Architectural style – urban villa
Orientation – see development plan
Maximum heights / limits – see development plan
Other specifications – none
Owners’ Requirements
Architectural style, roof type, building type – urban villa with pitched roof
Basement, number of floors – no basement
Number of occupants, age – 2
Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor – 70 sqm (753 sq ft), 70 sqm (753 sq ft)
Office: family use or home office? – guest room
Guests per year – once per month
Open or closed architecture – partially open
Conservative or modern design – modern
Open kitchen, kitchen island – yes
Number of dining seats – 6
Fireplace – no
Music/sound wall – no
Balcony, roof terrace – no
Garage, carport – 6 x 9 m (20 x 30 ft)
Utility garden, greenhouse – only hedge and lawn area
Others – no special wishes or requirements, no daily routine, happy to explain why certain features are or are not wanted – none
House Design
Who designed it:
- Planner from a construction company – own plan / prefab house provider
- Architect – not yet appointed
- Do-it-yourself – no
What do you particularly like? Why? – passage from house to garage
What do you not like? Why? –
Price estimate according to architect/planner: open
Personal price limit for the house, including fittings: open
Preferred heating technology: district heating
If you have to give up on which details/extras
- can you do without: external venetian blinds (shutters)
- cannot do without: garage
Why is the design the way it is now? For example:
Standard design from the planner? Partly
Which wishes were implemented by the architect? Yes
A mixture of many examples from various magazines? Yes
What makes it particularly good or bad in your eyes? – tailored to our needs
H
hanghaus202327 Jun 2023 14:00@Alexander_ How did the neighbors deal with the slope? Retaining walls and leveled terrain?
hanghaus2023 schrieb:
@ypg The development plan allows for possible model positioning. It is not mandatory. This can also be clearly seen on Google Maps. Some houses have even been rotated away from the specified ridge direction, and garages have been built in different locations.That is exactly what I posted. But thanks for the literal wording.A
Alexander_27 Jun 2023 18:31hanghaus2023 schrieb:
@Alexander_ How did the neighbors deal with the slope?
Retaining walls and leveled ground?L-shaped concrete blocks at the lower end and then everything leveled out. That’s how we would want to do it as well.
Alexander_ schrieb:
L-shaped blocks at the bottom and then everything leveled out. That's how we would want it too. Due to its simplest common denominator, I can understand the popularity of this solution as well as I am surprised by it given the costliness. Overall, I would call it anti-landscaping ;-)
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
H
hanghaus202328 Jun 2023 10:40ypg schrieb:
That's exactly what I set up. But thanks for the literal wording. However, the original poster obviously did not understand that. Hence my clarification. 😉
H
hanghaus202328 Jun 2023 10:42Alexander_ schrieb:
L-shaped concrete blocks at the bottom and then everything leveled. That’s how we would want it too. But you do understand why I asked about the budget.
Post#16 is not meant to be ironic.