ᐅ Passive House as a Logical Choice? Are There Any Counterarguments?

Created on: 20 Feb 2015 19:54
V
Vogtländer
Hello everyone,

we are a family planning to build a house. So we have tried to gather as much information as possible. In the process, we have come across the passive house concept.

Do you know that feeling when you think you understand something and then wonder why everyone isn’t doing it that way? That’s exactly how we feel about the passive house right now. Are we missing something, or are there any arguments against building a passive house? I really can’t think of any.

Of course, it is somewhat more expensive, but if I recover the costs soon and then save money for life, I don’t understand, for example, why I would build a KfW 70 house instead...

So please either correct me or agree with me, but my conviction about the passive house feels a bit unsettling.

Thanks for your thoughts.
EveundGerd23 Feb 2015 20:15
@Vogtländer : coming
Y
ypg
23 Feb 2015 21:23
Vogtländer schrieb:
Can I mention the company name

Of course. Go ahead and mention it
Vogtländer23 Feb 2015 22:02
Brunner Timber House
Y
ypg
24 Feb 2015 12:46
@Vogtländer : We do not want to start a discussion about your choice. Company-related discussions belong in the moderated forum specific company feedback.
We therefore hope that you have carefully reviewed the building and service specifications at this price, or even had them checked by a professional, so that no hidden costs will come as a surprise to you.
Because nobody gives anything away for free.
If you would like professional assistance with your construction specifications, I can gladly offer a tip via private message.

Regards, Yvonne