Hello everyone,
I often read about the concept of "breathing walls."
Statements like:
- "We were told not to insulate because otherwise my 31cm (12 inch) brick wall won’t be able to breathe anymore."
- "We don’t need a ventilation system; the timber frame wall has no membrane, so it can breathe well."
- "We have a vapor-permeable wall, so moisture can escape outside, and I don’t need a ventilation system."
- "The wall is vapor-permeable, a ventilation system is not necessary, and you basically don’t need to ventilate."
I keep seeing these and similar sentences online and have even heard them personally from house building companies—the latest just this Monday. Other opinions include: Don’t put photovoltaics on the roof due to too much electromagnetic pollution. He would never install a ventilation system. Climate change? That doesn’t even exist. At some point, I just got up and left.
I’m an engineer, not involved in house building. But in my opinion, these statements make no sense at all.
A wall can never really "breathe" properly.
Here, "breathing" means a significant moisture exchange.
How is this supposed to work physically? It’s not a thin membrane, but a thick, solid wall or one filled with insulation.
Sure, a certain amount of moisture transfer always occurs. But in my view, this is absolutely negligible. There is no way that the few liters of moisture produced daily in a single-family house could pass through the wall to the outside without either a ventilation system or manual ventilation. Physically, this just can’t happen.
Of course, it’s different with older houses. They have numerous leaks that allow air and moisture exchange. But modern houses are sealed tightly. Therefore, there is no real air exchange through the walls.
And beyond the aspect of "removing moisture to the outside," there is also the aspect of "bringing fresh air into the house."
My point is not to argue for or against ventilation systems. I am in favor, but it can also work without one if you don’t want it—just with regular manual airing, in my opinion.
What do you think? Do these "breathing walls" really exist?
Am I completely wrong? Or is this myth just incredibly persistent among home builders and even building companies?
Best regards,
Specki
I often read about the concept of "breathing walls."
Statements like:
- "We were told not to insulate because otherwise my 31cm (12 inch) brick wall won’t be able to breathe anymore."
- "We don’t need a ventilation system; the timber frame wall has no membrane, so it can breathe well."
- "We have a vapor-permeable wall, so moisture can escape outside, and I don’t need a ventilation system."
- "The wall is vapor-permeable, a ventilation system is not necessary, and you basically don’t need to ventilate."
I keep seeing these and similar sentences online and have even heard them personally from house building companies—the latest just this Monday. Other opinions include: Don’t put photovoltaics on the roof due to too much electromagnetic pollution. He would never install a ventilation system. Climate change? That doesn’t even exist. At some point, I just got up and left.
I’m an engineer, not involved in house building. But in my opinion, these statements make no sense at all.
A wall can never really "breathe" properly.
Here, "breathing" means a significant moisture exchange.
How is this supposed to work physically? It’s not a thin membrane, but a thick, solid wall or one filled with insulation.
Sure, a certain amount of moisture transfer always occurs. But in my view, this is absolutely negligible. There is no way that the few liters of moisture produced daily in a single-family house could pass through the wall to the outside without either a ventilation system or manual ventilation. Physically, this just can’t happen.
Of course, it’s different with older houses. They have numerous leaks that allow air and moisture exchange. But modern houses are sealed tightly. Therefore, there is no real air exchange through the walls.
And beyond the aspect of "removing moisture to the outside," there is also the aspect of "bringing fresh air into the house."
My point is not to argue for or against ventilation systems. I am in favor, but it can also work without one if you don’t want it—just with regular manual airing, in my opinion.
What do you think? Do these "breathing walls" really exist?
Am I completely wrong? Or is this myth just incredibly persistent among home builders and even building companies?
Best regards,
Specki
S
SoiCowboy27 Nov 2020 00:15hampshire schrieb:
If you take the concept of breathing as a metaphorMetaphors cause confusion and might therefore be counterproductive for such a complex topic as house building...
“The eyes of the house are the windows and its heart is the heating system...”
just my two cents
H
hampshire27 Nov 2020 00:54Metaphors and imagery are generally excellent tools for clarifying complex topics. They fail when they do not highlight something essential. They fail when they are expected to represent the entire context. They fail when the recipient lacks the willingness to understand the sender.
I also don’t find the image of "breathing walls" particularly convincing.
I also don’t find the image of "breathing walls" particularly convincing.
The element in the house that "breathes" the most is the mechanical ventilation system with heat recovery. In a broader sense, one might also include gypsum or clay plaster, as there is still some interaction with the indoor air. However, the wall itself is largely inert.
H
hampshire27 Nov 2020 10:31The wall actually has many more qualities that contribute to a high level of living comfort – olfactory, acoustic, visual... Not all materials are the same. The mechanical ventilation system is (as a metaphor) a kind of "iron lung" for the house. In this case, "breathing" is indeed the better term.
hampshire schrieb:
I don’t find the image of "breathable walls" particularly successful either.As long as they don’t pant, gasp, groan, or cough...https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Similar topics