ᐅ Location of the House, Parking Space & Driveway on the Property?
Created on: 17 Jun 2017 20:05
N
NordlysThe access path seems to provide entry to the field behind the property, where grain is likely grown. This path would need to be wide enough to accommodate a combine harvester once a year. It shouldn't be too narrow; otherwise, the homebuilder’s fence could be at risk. Is that correct?
Option two preserves the property the most and requires the least amount of paving. You could even arrange the two parking spaces parallel to the path, one behind the other, or as angled parking. Karsten
Option two preserves the property the most and requires the least amount of paving. You could even arrange the two parking spaces parallel to the path, one behind the other, or as angled parking. Karsten
To the north, as shown in the picture, there is currently a view of a field sloping up the hill. So, nothing particularly scenic. There might be an expansion of the residential area in this direction in a few years. That also explains the side road. And yes, connection from the side is allowed.
Edit: The combine harvester could use this road, but there is also a field path that provides access to the field. Therefore, it is unlikely that the farmer would take the route through the residential area.
Edit: The combine harvester could use this road, but there is also a field path that provides access to the field. Therefore, it is unlikely that the farmer would take the route through the residential area.
A field not worth seeing? The roe buck stands there at dusk, the doe is leading the fawns out, the fox says goodnight to the hare, the buzzard circles and swoops down on the mouse, in spring and early summer spraying takes place, in July and August it’s harvest time, in November manure is spread on it... nothing to see, you think. Plenty to see and smell. [emoji1][emoji1][emoji1]
@Escroda Thank you very much for the hint about the development plan! There is indeed one, and unfortunately, none of the options we had in mind are allowed according to it.
We were probably a bit naive in the initial planning. :-(
I have attached the development plan. It concerns plot number 3. Parking spaces are only allowed in the areas marked with red hatching. Additionally, there are several other building regulations, as you already mentioned.
Given the circumstances, would you build as shown in the design by the planning office? Or would you position the house more toward the northeast?
Are building regulations strictly mandatory, or is there a possibility to challenge them, perhaps with strong arguments or legal assistance?
I am fully aware that we knew about the development plan beforehand, but due to the situation on the property market, we didn’t examine it closely. We are just glad to have found a plot and been awarded it. Now we want to make the best of it.
Thank you for further suggestions and help!

We were probably a bit naive in the initial planning. :-(
I have attached the development plan. It concerns plot number 3. Parking spaces are only allowed in the areas marked with red hatching. Additionally, there are several other building regulations, as you already mentioned.
Given the circumstances, would you build as shown in the design by the planning office? Or would you position the house more toward the northeast?
Are building regulations strictly mandatory, or is there a possibility to challenge them, perhaps with strong arguments or legal assistance?
I am fully aware that we knew about the development plan beforehand, but due to the situation on the property market, we didn’t examine it closely. We are just glad to have found a plot and been awarded it. Now we want to make the best of it.
Thank you for further suggestions and help!
A clear yes. Build exactly according to the plan. The southeast to south-southwest area is free. Your neighbor, who is at number 4, must choose the other ridge direction. If he’s not completely foolish, he’ll go toward the southeast to get some west sunlight in the evening. If you stay in the northwest, you’re practically suggesting that to him. This way, you both have a good distance between your houses. Changing the driveway on your side is hardly possible, except maybe at an angle, because of the streetlight. That’s already installed. Otherwise, it’s a classic restrictive development plan, with a tree requirement on every plot... the trees are already marked in, even their locations have been chosen, but this is probably not binding. The location, the pine tree, is binding. And you must comply with the development plan. Exceptions are only allowed for technical reasons if necessary for construction, not for aesthetic reasons. And forget about a lawyer to object; you knew the plan before buying and thus accepted it. Karsten
Similar topics