ᐅ Is a 136 cm width too narrow for a restroom with a toilet and a urinal?

Created on: 4 Apr 2016 11:40
M
merlin83
Hello,

Is 136cm (54 inches) wide enough for a toilet and urinal? Or would it be better to leave out the urinal?

Best regards,

Merlin

Grundriss eines Badezimmers (DU/WC) mit Toilette, Waschbecken und Tuer.
B
Bauexperte
4 Apr 2016 13:01
merlin83 schrieb:
I looked at the shell construction and found it tight. Everything is tight at the shell stage

When the interior finishing is complete, it will feel larger due to the light-colored walls; in fact, however, it is narrower!

I assume this is only a temporary shower on the ground floor? If so, maybe an 80cm (32 inch) shower would be enough; this would save you 10cm (4 inches), bringing it to 1.46 m (4 ft 9 ½ in). It will still be a bit tight, as a toilet usually requires about 80cm (32 inches) including the wall frame installation, but it would feel airier than with the 90cm (36 inch) shower tray. I also can’t imagine that using a urinal would cause splashing, especially since the distance the warm liquid has to travel is shorter.

Best regards, Bauexperte

Floor plan of a building: bathroom (shower/toilet) with sink, door, hallway, and stairwell.
M
merlin83
4 Apr 2016 13:12
Bauexperte schrieb:
When the interior finishing is complete, the light-colored walls make the space look bigger; however, in reality, it is narrower!

I assume this is just a temporary shower on the ground floor? If so, maybe an 80cm (31.5 inches) shower would be enough; that would gain you 10cm (4 inches), bringing the width to 1.46m (4 feet 9.5 inches). It would still be a bit tight, as a toilet requires about 80cm (31.5 inches) including the wall-hung installation, but it would feel more spacious than with the 90cm (35.5 inches) shower tray. Also, I can’t imagine there would be any splashing when using a urinal, especially since the distance the warm liquid has to travel is shorter.

Regards, Bauexperte

Yes, the shower is a backup option. There is another one in the basement as well... got a better price when buying three together.

So, your suggestion is to use an 80cm by 80cm (31.5 inches by 31.5 inches) shower and keep the urinal? Is that correct?
wrobel4 Apr 2016 13:20
Hello

I would also solve it the way Bauexperte suggested.
To optimize it a bit more, for a shower that is used less frequently, I would go with 75 x 90 cm (30 x 35 inches) and install the fixtures on the 75 cm (30 inches) side.

Possibly also consider leaving out the third shower.

Olli
B
Bauexperte
4 Apr 2016 13:20
merlin83 schrieb:

So your suggestion would be an 80 by 80 cm (31 by 31 inches) shower and keep the urinal? Did I understand that correctly?

My suggestion is that only you can decide; it’s your house! However, if the urinal is important to you, I would definitely reduce the size of the shower on the ground floor.

On the other hand, you now mention having three showers – then *I* personally wouldn’t hesitate and would remove the ground floor shower altogether. That way, your problem wouldn’t even arise.

Best regards, Bauexperte
MarcWen4 Apr 2016 13:33
I've never sat on one of those before. I don't even know which way you're supposed to sit on it or if you need to pull your pants down or if just opening the zipper is enough.

I need to check whether they are included in our planning.
B
Bauexperte
4 Apr 2016 13:38
MarcWen schrieb:
I've never sat on something like that before ...

You can't either, since you stand in front of it (similar to a pub, but nicer and with a lid)

Best regards, Bauexperte