ᐅ Initial Floor Plan Draft – Backyard Development – 1.5 Stories
Created on: 15 Oct 2025 14:31
S
Steiger
Hello everyone,
we would like to present our first floor plan draft and kindly ask for your honest feedback.
The house is designed for 2 adults plus potentially 2 children in the future and will be built on a rural plot of land. We are currently in the design phase and welcome all constructive comments and suggestions for improvement.
The plot is a backyard development, which means there are some restrictions. For example, we are not allowed to exceed a length of 7.0 m (23 feet) and an eave height of 3.7 m (12 feet). In addition, the assigned plots are not yet developed, so we will need to build a road access here.
On the site plan we were allocated plot number 4.
More details are included in the notes..
Building Plan / Restrictions
Homeowner Requirements
House Design
Why the design looks like this
We wanted a home that is family-friendly, functional, and suitable for aging in place, while complying with the building plan.
The basic idea: parents live fully on the ground floor, children live upstairs.
We are still optimizing and would appreciate feedback on:
We look forward to your honest feedback!
What would you improve or arrange differently?
Thank you very much in advance for your time and suggestions.
we would like to present our first floor plan draft and kindly ask for your honest feedback.
The house is designed for 2 adults plus potentially 2 children in the future and will be built on a rural plot of land. We are currently in the design phase and welcome all constructive comments and suggestions for improvement.
The plot is a backyard development, which means there are some restrictions. For example, we are not allowed to exceed a length of 7.0 m (23 feet) and an eave height of 3.7 m (12 feet). In addition, the assigned plots are not yet developed, so we will need to build a road access here.
On the site plan we were allocated plot number 4.
More details are included in the notes..
Building Plan / Restrictions
- Plot size: approximately 27.5 m (90 feet) wide × 41 m (135 feet) deep (~1,100 m² (12,000 sq ft))
- Terrain: flat, no slope
- Site coverage ratio (floor area ratio): 0.4
- Floor space index (floor area ratio): 0.4
- Building envelope / setbacks: 3 m (10 feet) boundary setback, house positioned on the right side, garage may be built on the boundary
- Number of floors: 1.5 stories (maximum ridge height 7 m (23 feet), eave height approx. 3.7 m (12 feet))
- Roof type: gable roof, minimum 25° pitch
- Architectural style: modern country house style
- Orientation: south is at the top of the plan
- Maximum heights: 7 m (23 feet) ridge, 3.7 m (12 feet) eave
- Additional requirements: the plot must be accessed via a new road. The style must blend with the neighborhood.
Homeowner Requirements
- Building type: single-family home, 1.5 stories, no basement
- Occupants: 2 adults, later 2 children
- Ground floor needs: parents’ area fully on the ground floor (bedroom, dressing room, bathroom), living/dining/kitchen area (living area preferably separate), utility room with access to the garage, guest toilet
- Upper floor needs: 2 children’s bedrooms, 1 office, 1 bathroom, storage room
- Office: for home office and flexible use
- Guest accommodation: rare (max. 2–3 times per year)
- Architecture: open, welcoming, with clear sightlines
- Construction method: rather conservative-modern (no flat roof, but light materials, clean lines)
- Kitchen: open kitchen with island
- Dining area: spacious, table for 6–8 people
- Fireplace: optional, mainly for design/coziness, probably no
- Music/stereo: no specific plans yet
- Balcony/roof terrace: no
- Garage/carport: double garage, direct access to utility room, cars might be parked under a covered entrance to keep the garage space free since there will be no attic
- Garden: usable garden area, south-facing terrace → I would like to plan a conservatory here for the future or optionally build it right away. Since we will have a south-facing garden with farmland behind, a conservatory is desired as a separated area to be used all year round.
- Special features:
- Smart home planned
- Parents’ area deliberately on the ground floor
- Conservatory desired either in the future or built-in from the start
House Design
- Designed by: architect
- What we particularly like:
- South orientation with bright rooms
- Functional floor plan and parents’ area
- What we don’t like (yet):
- Children’s bathroom upstairs might be too large
- Bedroom too small
- Pantry/storage room has a door to the utility room; maybe reduce utility room size to enlarge pantry
- Children’s bedroom closets block windows and might reduce lighting
- Driveway to garage is not ideal. The garage may need to be moved further back
- Price estimate from architect: not available yet
- Personal price limit (house + fittings): around 500,000 € (approximately), completely self-built, land already purchased
- Heating system: ground source heat pump with borehole, underfloor heating, technical room probably in the garage equipment room
Why the design looks like this
We wanted a home that is family-friendly, functional, and suitable for aging in place, while complying with the building plan.
The basic idea: parents live fully on the ground floor, children live upstairs.
We are still optimizing and would appreciate feedback on:
- Room layout on the ground floor (hallway, sleeping area)
- Living/dining/kitchen area: solution with an adjacent conservatory. Living area preferably separate, so children or adults can use different paths when guests visit.
- Garage size
- Children’s bathroom: size and whether the storage room could be bigger and the bathroom smaller. Possibly separate the toilet from the children’s bathroom?
We look forward to your honest feedback!
What would you improve or arrange differently?
Thank you very much in advance for your time and suggestions.
W
wiltshire17 Oct 2025 10:29haydee schrieb:
I really can’t get used to the look. Somehow it feels like a 1950s suburban house that has just been poorly extended multiple times.. I can understand the comparison and would approach the roofing and facade design differently. I would highlight the feature of the projecting living space in another way and try to bring some natural light from above into the potentially dark dining area.
haydee schrieb:
Is there a specific reason why you want to sleep on the ground floor? Of course, I don’t know the original poster’s reason, but I can share that it’s great to be able to step directly from the sleeping area and bathroom into nature. Not having to walk through the house is, for me, less about laziness or the number of steps, and more about allowing myself to start the day with movement, without passing anything that reminds me of tasks or duties. I get up, go out into the garden or forest, smell the fresh scent, listen to the birds, and take some time. Sometimes before, sometimes after the shower. I wouldn’t want to miss this occasional ritual anymore.
ypg schrieb:
I am currently the only one left here who is still working on the plans – if you can be patient for a few days.. at the moment I’m trying to develop an idea for a parallel thread.Gladly. I find your point about blending ideas very interesting.. We have time, and I would be very excited to see a new idea.
hanghaus2023 schrieb:
In my opinion, the garage should be on the north side and the sleeping area as well. The entrance then on the west.We had originally considered that too. But doing so would take more space from the backyard. Our architect also experimented a bit with placing the garage on the north side, but he found the arrangement towards the west to be more practical and aesthetically pleasing.
T
Teimo198817 Oct 2025 13:43I just have one comment regarding the heating system. When it comes to geothermal heat pumps, I would suggest looking into the slinky ground loop collector. It is definitely feasible on your property, and you can save quite a bit compared to deep boreholes while also being able to contribute your own labor.
Steiger schrieb:
But then we lose more garden space at the back.I don’t quite understand that: The garage is 7 meters (23 feet) away from the north side. If you move it to the north as an edge development, you do get a slightly larger driveway and lose about a meter (3 feet) of garden space on the south side, but honestly, it’s definitely worth giving that up for a bright, light-filled house with the possibility to open it to the west. The west side is much more important in summer, while the south side is more crucial for indoor spaces during the colder months. Also, a garden feels larger when you can view it diagonally. In the end, when looking at the “backyard development,” having a bit more courtyard space can’t be a bad thing. Visually, a right angle always has a positive effect (this strategy was also applied for the terrace).
Similar topics