Hello,
to my surprise, we managed to hit the target exactly with our house planning for KfW 55. Since the repayment subsidies became more attractive from 04/01/16, I also took a look at KfW 40/40+.
Roughly about the house:
Single-family house with approximately 138 sqm (1,485 sq ft), basement for utility rooms, ground floor, and attic. Gable roof with 18°. Monolithic construction with controlled residential ventilation and an air-to-water heat pump.
The KfW 40+ information sheet states:
- A renewable energy-based power generation system
- A stationary battery storage system (electricity storage)
- A ventilation system with heat recovery
- A visualization of power generation and consumption via an appropriate user interface
So, would a photovoltaic system with battery storage possibly be enough to qualify for KfW 40+?
With a 15,000 € grant, that wouldn’t be a significant additional cost.
Best regards,
dsin8788
to my surprise, we managed to hit the target exactly with our house planning for KfW 55. Since the repayment subsidies became more attractive from 04/01/16, I also took a look at KfW 40/40+.
Roughly about the house:
Single-family house with approximately 138 sqm (1,485 sq ft), basement for utility rooms, ground floor, and attic. Gable roof with 18°. Monolithic construction with controlled residential ventilation and an air-to-water heat pump.
The KfW 40+ information sheet states:
- A renewable energy-based power generation system
- A stationary battery storage system (electricity storage)
- A ventilation system with heat recovery
- A visualization of power generation and consumption via an appropriate user interface
So, would a photovoltaic system with battery storage possibly be enough to qualify for KfW 40+?
With a 15,000 € grant, that wouldn’t be a significant additional cost.
Best regards,
dsin8788
H
HilfeHilfe16 Dec 2015 14:49your architect knows that............
Hi,
I think first you need to reduce from 55 to 40 and then install the Plus Package.
That means lowering Q_p and H´_T from 55 to 40 and from 70 to 55, respectively.
Whether this is possible afterwards is uncertain; you really need to consult the builder of your house or your architect. Personally, I believe a) it is not that simple, and b) it will probably cost a considerable amount of money if it is possible.
What you listed seems to be only the scope for the Plus Package.
Best regards,
Thorsten
KfW-Efficiency House 40 Plus 40 55
QP in % QPREF 40 40 55
H’T in % H’TREF 55 55 70
Additional requirement. Plus Package
I think first you need to reduce from 55 to 40 and then install the Plus Package.
That means lowering Q_p and H´_T from 55 to 40 and from 70 to 55, respectively.
Whether this is possible afterwards is uncertain; you really need to consult the builder of your house or your architect. Personally, I believe a) it is not that simple, and b) it will probably cost a considerable amount of money if it is possible.
What you listed seems to be only the scope for the Plus Package.
Best regards,
Thorsten
KfW-Efficiency House 40 Plus 40 55
QP in % QPREF 40 40 55
H’T in % H’TREF 55 55 70
Additional requirement. Plus Package
B
Bauexperte16 Dec 2015 16:22Hello Thorsten,
Actually, it's sufficient (assuming the single-family house is not being built on the Kahlen ASten) to have the photovoltaic system* with storage as described by the original poster.
Edit: *of adequate size. The required size is calculated by the specialist planner.
Best regards, Bauexperte
T21150 schrieb:No, not really.
I think you first have to reduce from 55 to 40 and then install the Plus Package.
Actually, it's sufficient (assuming the single-family house is not being built on the Kahlen ASten) to have the photovoltaic system* with storage as described by the original poster.
Edit: *of adequate size. The required size is calculated by the specialist planner.
Best regards, Bauexperte
Bauexperte schrieb:
Hello Thorsten,
No, not really.
The photovoltaic system with storage described by the original poster is actually sufficient (as long as the single-family house is not going to be built on the Kahlen ASten).
Regards, BauexperteNot a bad thing. Then I must have looked at the wrong documents.
That would be ideal for the original poster.....
Similar topics