ᐅ Hager technical control unit or server cabinet?

That can happen faster than you might expect. Using a switch, even with VLANs, is fine, but when it comes to routing, depending on the configuration, you can quickly end up in a scenario where the routing is done in software (on the switch), which tends to be slower.

Faster and better is always possible, but not always necessary.
Currently, only the Wi-Fi devices (mobile phones) in my setup are being limited by the maximum possible Wi-Fi throughput. The rest of the network runs with the current configuration using the SG 300 in Layer 3, performing no worse than when the SG 300 was configured as a simple switch without routing. If you truly need much more performance, there are of course better devices available, but also at a “better” price. You can find an SG 300 for a low price on classified ads, often even with PoE...
We are still talking about a small home network here; the SG 300 provides plenty of power for this and can handle more and larger setups, although exceptions always prove the rule.

Daniel-Sp schrieb:

Faster and better is always possible. But it’s not always necessary.

That’s true, but with the SG300 we’re talking about less than 100 Mbit/s routing speed. That’s slow even for private households. My point, however, is just to avoid the belief that a typical small business routing switch alone provides a good solution once you’re dealing with multiple subnets.

@Daniel-Sp As far as I know, the 300 series supports dynamic routing. Are you using that or do you have simple static routes?

Only static routes (I need more characters)

My SG250x only supports static routing, so I have a question.
Which VLANs do you use?
Internal network, guest, Wi-Fi, IoT, management?