ᐅ Concrete slab contractor, city inspection report

Created on: 24 Mar 2012 18:33
K
Kira94
Kira94 schrieb:

Hello everyone,
our house needs to be built on piles (depth 3.5–4 meters (11.5–13 feet)). No problem, we knew this beforehand. The seller from the prefabricated house company said at the time of purchase that €2,000–3,000 (around $2,300–3,400) is a reasonable amount because the excavator would already be on site and for that money you get a lot of concrete. Now the foundation slab contractor (construction company = partner) says that this is definitely not possible at that price. We have now requested a concrete quote because recently figures in the range of €7,000–10,000 (around $8,000–11,500) have been mentioned. We are unsure what would be a fair price for a slab with an area of 78 sqm (840 sq ft) plus a 50 sqm (540 sq ft) garage. He also wants to reinforce the slab somewhat—but by how much? We also don’t know if 9 or 12 piles including the garage will be enough, as that number is planned for our timber-frame house.
Can anyone give us advice or tell us what costs are reasonable?
Best regards, sonne

We agreed with the foundation slab contractor on €10,000 (about $11,500) for a planned depth of 4 meters (13 feet).
A few more details about the construction site: A company used to operate on this land years ago. The city purchased these old buildings, demolished them, and developed building plots.
All assessments were carried out by the city, which confirmed that all hazardous substances found in the soil were removed and properly disposed of. Therefore, there was no cause for concern, especially since the environmental authority conducted inspections and issued clearance. We knew that the soil had been moved and filled in, which is why the plan was to build on piles.
Now to the disaster: When digging the first pile, after 5 meters (16 feet) there was still no solid ground in sight, and here is the worst part—there was a large amount of contaminated soil, which we suspect is polluted with heating oil.
The city, police, district office, and our lawyer were immediately involved. The construction site is now on hold; analyses and investigations will follow. After just one day, approximately 40–50 liters (10–13 gallons) of liquid had accumulated at the bottom of the pit. The area smells strongly of contamination. Neighbors who have already built their houses are now very unsettled about what might be under their own properties.
Who is responsible for ensuring that appropriate measures are taken, and most importantly, who is liable and will cover the costs of the soil remediation?
Der Da2 Apr 2012 16:47
Then your lawyer has 2 weeks to prepare everything. Always look on the bright side 🙂
K
Kira94
16 May 2012 09:10
Hello everyone,
the site remediation at a depth of 7m (23 feet) is now complete.
The city is covering the costs by contracting all service providers for the project.
Unfortunately, the entire area could not be remediated because slope angles of 45° relative to the neighboring houses had to be maintained.
I am still not satisfied because the following assurances have not yet been provided:
>>> Registration with the authority regarding contamination/concerns yes/no? <<< (if yes = withdrawal, result in about two weeks)
- if no, a clearance certificate for soil and human safety
- if no, a permanent guarantee from the municipality regarding long-term consequences
- if no, depreciation of the non-remediated area (7m (23 feet) around up to the boundary)
- if no, coverage of foundation costs (pile foundation) by the municipality
These are all unresolved issues that come to mind!
Does anyone have recommendations for the next steps or any tips? We do have a lawyer, but as we have now unfortunately (or maybe not, unclear) learned, they are friends with the mayor and also work for the city in other matters!
Thank you in advance for your feedback!
T
Thomas463
16 May 2012 13:00
I’m not really familiar with benzene.

But what if, during rain or similar conditions, pollutants from neighboring properties (if they are also contaminated) get washed onto your property? Certain areas beneath houses might not be replaceable, but those contaminants will likely spread evenly again over time (even if slowly). What will happen in 15 to 30 years if you want to sell the house and property and the soil has absorbed pollutants again? Even if the site is pollutant-free right after remediation, the situation could change later on.

Personally, I would look for a different property rather than rely on luck. But that’s just my perspective.

Oh, and if you’re concerned that the lawyer might be biased or not impartial, I would contact another lawyer to see if that represents a conflict of interest and consider changing lawyers. After all, your lawyer should fully represent YOUR interests.

Best regards,
Thomas463