ᐅ Floor Plan Optimization for a Single-Family Home of Approximately 150 sqm on a Small Plot

Created on: 18 Aug 2020 20:31
Y
Yaso2.0
Yaso2.018 Aug 2020 20:31
Hello everyone,

After what felt like forever, we finally received the floor plan (without exact dimensions) today from our preferred general contractor. Although the planner noted our requests during the meeting, some of them don’t seem to have been fully incorporated.

The price offer will be prepared once the floor plan is finalized, especially if the size increases.

I would like to share the floor plan with you and hear your suggestions for improvements!

Development plan / Restrictions
Plot size: 389sqm (4187 sq ft)
Sloping site
Site coverage ratio 0.35
Floor area ratio 0.70
Building envelope, building line, and boundary
Edge development
Number of parking spaces: 2
Number of floors: 2
Roof type
Architectural style
Orientation
Maximum heights / limits
Additional requirements

Client requirements
Architectural style, roof type, building type: City villa
Basement, number of stories: 2 stories, no basement
Number of occupants, ages: 3 persons (44, 38, 9)
Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor
Kitchen, living room, guest WC, utility room, and if possible, a small office
Office: family use or home office?
Guests for overnight stays vary widely
Open or closed architecture partly/partly
Conservative or modern style: a healthy mix of both
Open kitchen, kitchen island: semi-open kitchen, kitchen island not mandatory
Number of dining seats: 6–8
Fireplace: possibly
Music / stereo wall
Balcony, roof terrace
Garage, carport
Utility garden, greenhouse, garden for pleasant evenings
Additional wishes / special features / daily routines, including reasons why certain elements are wanted or not

We want a larger but semi-open kitchen because I cook and/or bake daily. A pantry would be great but I would also give it up if it means more counter space in the kitchen.

Ideally, I would like a laundry room on the upper floor since all the laundry tasks happen upstairs.

House design
Planner:
- Planner from a construction company
What do you particularly like? Why? Pantry room,
In the upper floor, the bedroom does not directly adjoin the children’s rooms
What do you dislike? Why?
Kitchen accessible only through the living room, hallway seems like wasted space??, kitchen counter size too small,
Cost estimate by architect/planner: still open, to follow after floor plan and house size are finalized
Personal budget limit for the house including fixtures and fittings:
Preferred heating system:

If you had to compromise, on which details / additions
- Could you do without: walk-in closet
- Could you not do without: “larger” kitchen

Why is the design the way it is now?
The general contractor’s planner asked about our preferences and created the floor plan accordingly. Apparently, an office didn’t fit. The requirement was that we ideally don’t want more than 150sqm (1615 sq ft), a kitchen size of at least 13sqm (140 sq ft) would be nice, and if possible, no straight staircase.

What makes it particularly good or bad in your eyes?
The hallway seems to take up too much space without much utility, the kitchen feels too small.

The walk-in closet is “enclosed” and should be accessible via the corridor.

We like that the children’s rooms are exactly the same size. The future child planning is currently flexible.

What is the most important / fundamental question about the floor plan in 130 characters?
How can we make the kitchen accessible through the hallway and semi-open, without making it too small?

Would a different staircase allow for a better layout?
Or are our wishes not feasible within 150sqm?

Thanks in advance!

Ground floor plan: open living/dining/kitchen area, hallway, pantry, utility room, WC, carport.


Upper floor plan: Child 1, Child 2, bedroom/walk-in closet, bathroom, gallery.


Site plan of the property: house with carport, car, measurement lines and dimensions.
11ant18 Aug 2020 20:56
The standard floor plan looks fine, but it still doesn’t make much sense to discuss it yet: even if the office is meant to be small, it’s not there yet, so the situation will change again anyway. Child 1 is already 9 years old, plus a nine-month delivery time means the sibling will be at least 10 by the time they arrive. What’s the point of having bedrooms of the same size then?
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Pinky030118 Aug 2020 20:57
Yaso2.0 schrieb:

How can we make the kitchen accessible through the hallway?
Is swapping the living area and kitchen an option? That would eliminate the pantry, but as it is currently drawn (with two small shelves), it’s not really useful anyway.
Alternatively, keep the kitchen in its current location but do without the pantry. Usually, what you store there can fit into a kitchen pantry cabinet, which would make the kitchen larger. As it stands now, the kitchen is very impractical.
Yaso2.018 Aug 2020 21:16
11ant schrieb:

The standard floor plan looks okay overall, but it still doesn’t make sense to discuss it yet: even if the office is only supposed to be a small one – it’s still missing, and that means the whole situation needs to be reassessed. Child 1 is already 9 years old, plus a delivery time of nine months means it will be at least ten before the sibling arrives. What would be the point of having two equally sized children’s rooms then?

The office on the ground floor is my husband’s idea, but in my opinion it’s not necessary. The planner probably picked up on this during our conversation and therefore didn’t include it in the plan.

Good question regarding the children’s rooms, I have no idea why, but having two similarly sized rooms just felt right. If there is no second child, it would become a guest room.

I recently went through the thread by Shiny86, which almost drove me crazy. I really like her floor plan; it aligns with my ideas (except for a separate en suite for the parents). However, her house dimensions are too large.
Pinky0301 schrieb:

Is swapping the living area and kitchen an option? That would eliminate the pantry, but as it’s currently drawn (with two small shelves), the pantry isn’t very useful anyway.
Or keep the kitchen where it is but without the pantry (what you can store in there usually fits in a kitchen cabinet pantry), which would make the kitchen bigger. As it stands now, it is extremely impractical.

The kitchen should remain where it is because the terrace is planned to run along the full width of the kitchen and dining area. I also find it extremely impractical!
Pinky030118 Aug 2020 21:18
Yaso2.0 schrieb:

the terrace should be located along the width of the kitchen plus dining area.
In that case, I would also make the terrace accessible from the kitchen; otherwise, you won’t really gain any advantage from it.
Yaso2.018 Aug 2020 21:42
Pinky0301 schrieb:

Then I would also make the terrace accessible from the kitchen; otherwise, you wouldn’t really gain any advantage from it.

If that is possible, we would plan it that way. However, I expect that there would again be a lack of space in the kitchen. Would it be too far to access it through the dining area instead?

Similar topics