ᐅ Preliminary floor plan design for a 220 m² single-family house

Created on: 20 Jun 2017 22:41
R
R.Hotzenplotz
Hello!

We have already gone through several plans with our architect and I think we are almost there, about to start the detailed planning phase. Before that, I’m looking forward to getting feedback from other users.

Development plan/restrictions: §34 – two full stories

Plot size: 1,085m² (1,1679 yd²)

Basement, floors – 2 full stories plus partial basement

Number of people, ages – 3 people (37, 34, 1, second child planned)

Space requirements on ground floor and upper floor – the requirement was that bedrooms and the study should be about 17m² (183 ft²) each; the entire house should be approximately 220m² (2,368 ft²)

Office: family use

Guests per year: 1

Open or closed architecture: closed

Traditional or modern design: modern

Open kitchen, kitchen island – no open kitchen, but yes to a kitchen island

Number of dining seats – 6

Fireplace – yes

Music/stereo wall – TV wall

Balcony, roof terrace – balcony

Garage, carport – large garage

Additional wishes/special features/daily routines, preferably with reasons why certain things should or should not be included – everyone should be able to sleep as undisturbed as possible in their bedrooms, even if other family members are awake. The husband is sometimes up as early as 4 a.m. Otherwise, watching TV in the evening should be possible without disturbing those sleeping upstairs.

House design
Who created the design:
- Architect (freelancer for a general contractor)

What do you like most? Why?
The upper floor with well-sized rooms and the location of the rooms exactly where they should be (only the washroom area we would still like to move to the outer right corner so that you don’t have to pass it every time you use the toilet). On the ground floor, the access through an airlock, the kitchen, and the dining area with the study next to it are especially liked.
Also appreciated is that after adjustments, the study now faces the garden instead of the street.

What don’t you like? Why?
We originally wanted the distance from wall to wall where the sofa and TV stand is to be about 6.40m (21 ft) (large screen & surround system), but so far only 5.69m (19 ft) has been realized.

Laundry room as described.

Kitchen larger in square meters than needed; the approx. 3m² (32 ft²) could theoretically be used well in the living area.

Price estimate according to architect/planner:
720,000 euros (including construction incidentals)

Personal price limit for the house, including equipment:
800,000 euros

Preferred heating technology:
Gas

If you have to give up on something, which details/features can you do without?

- Can do without:
Technical systems like controlled residential ventilation

- Cannot do without:
Space (except for the kitchen)

Why is the design the way it is now? For example:
Is this a standard design from the planner?
The architect has largely implemented our wishes; the only issue is the living room situation.

What makes it particularly good or bad in your opinion?
Patient, quick to implement, has already gotten to know us well.
No negative points.

Do you notice any other points that might not fit or that we should consider, which we might have overlooked?

In the basement, the room currently labeled as home cinema might possibly be used as one medium- to long-term. For the foreseeable future, it will be a storage room.
R
R.Hotzenplotz
21 Aug 2017 12:20
Bieber0815 schrieb:
I think it would be great if the most current floor plan draft could be pinned in the first post ... After 57 pages, I have definitely lost track :-(.

Great idea. Unfortunately, it seems the first post can no longer be edited. Has the editing period maybe expired?
kaho674 schrieb:
Because the basement stairs are much shorter than the other ones. This topic has already been laughed at, and we are eagerly awaiting the execution.

Laughed at in the sense of only 1m (3 feet) of space between the stairway and the kitchen wall?
kaho67421 Aug 2017 12:24
R.Hotzenplotz schrieb:

Laughing in the sense of only 1m (3.3 ft) of space between the stairway and the kitchen wall?
Yes, the stair landing is actually unacceptable for the size of the house and will definitely be changed. The basement stairs will probably be made a quarter turn after all.
R
R.Hotzenplotz
21 Aug 2017 12:26
kaho674 schrieb:
Yes, the start is actually unacceptable for the house size and will certainly be changed. The basement stairs will probably end up being a quarter-turn after all.

Not quarter-turn. Then let's just start over; that would also be the logical consequence – and a few square meters could be saved in the process. Moving the kitchen wall to the right will also be difficult (because of the steel beam).
Y
ypg
21 Aug 2017 12:32
R.Hotzenplotz schrieb:
No spiral staircase. Then we’d better start over; that would also be the logical consequence – and we could save a few square meters in the process. Moving the kitchen wall to the right will also be difficult because of the steel beam.

What would be so bad about having the basement stairs spiral at the start? For a basement staircase, it would actually be much more practical since it would make the route more direct. You wouldn’t even see it or notice it [emoji2]
R
R.Hotzenplotz
21 Aug 2017 12:34
ypg schrieb:
What would be so bad about turning the basement stairs right at the start? For a basement staircase, it would actually be much more practical because it makes the path more direct. You can’t even see it or it wouldn’t stand out [emoji2]

Now it makes sense. Just turning the start of the staircase and not the whole staircase.

Thanks!

Yes, that definitely isn’t a dealbreaker—visually it might not be the greatest since we’re considering cladding the stair side with glass, but it would be a solution...

I personally wouldn’t have a problem redesigning from scratch if there were too many compromises. But my wife has had enough of it and really wants to get it finalized.
kaho67421 Aug 2017 12:44
R.Hotzenplotz schrieb:
Now it has clicked.

Are you sure? Because...
R.Hotzenplotz schrieb:

Yes, it definitely isn’t a deal breaker – visually it’s not the best option, especially since we’re considering cladding the stair side with glass, but it could be a solution...

…the stair side itself wouldn’t change and could still be clad with glass.