ᐅ Floor plan design for a new build modern semi-detached house with 6-meter ceiling height and 239 square meters of living space
Created on: 9 Nov 2025 23:46
L
lucaskilam
Hello everyone,
I am planning to demolish my existing semi-detached house and build a modern residential building on my property.
The new house will again be attached directly to the existing neighboring half.
The plot measures 1,027 sqm (about 11,060 sq ft), and the design comes from my architect.
I would appreciate honest and constructive feedback on the floor plan and room layout.
Elevations and floor plans are attached.
Development plan / restrictions
Client requirements
House design
I look forward to honest criticism and suggestions for improvement, especially regarding:
Thank you in advance for your feedback!
Best regards,
lucaskilam
I am planning to demolish my existing semi-detached house and build a modern residential building on my property.
The new house will again be attached directly to the existing neighboring half.
The plot measures 1,027 sqm (about 11,060 sq ft), and the design comes from my architect.
I would appreciate honest and constructive feedback on the floor plan and room layout.
Elevations and floor plans are attached.
Development plan / restrictions
- Plot size: 1,027 sqm (half share use for semi-detached house)
- Slope: no slope, flat area
- Site coverage ratio: 0.3
- Floor area ratio: 0.5
- Building envelope / building line / building boundary: according to development plan, semi-detached house permitted
- Edge development: attached to existing neighboring half
- Number of parking spaces: 2
- Number of floors: 1.5 floors
- Roof type: gable roof
- Architectural style: modern, clean lines
- Orientation: garden facing southwest
- Maximum building height: 10 m (33 ft)
- Other requirements: only one full storey allowed
Client requirements
- Building type: semi-detached house, new build after demolition
- Basement: no
- Living area: approx. 239 sqm (2,572 sq ft)
- Occupants: 5 persons (2 adults, 3 children)
- Ceiling height in living area: approx. 6 m (20 ft)
- Living/dining area: approx. 44 sqm (473 sq ft), open and bright
- Office: home office on ground floor
- Guest bedrooms: rare use (max. 2–3 times per year)
- Architecture: open, modern, large windows
- Construction method: solid construction
- Kitchen: open with cooking island
- Seating capacity: 6–8 people
- Fireplace: not planned
- Music/stereo wall: possible
- Balcony / roof terrace: currently not planned
- Garage / carport: double carport
- Garden: low maintenance, for family use
- Special features: high, open living area with gallery
House design
- Designed by: independent architect
- Positive aspects: the open living area with gallery and high ceiling, generous lighting
- Less favorable aspects: access to the gallery not yet optimal
- Price estimate according to architect: approx. 850,000 euros (including fittings, excluding landscaping)
- Personal budget limit: approx. 900,000 euros
- Heating system: air-to-water heat pump with underfloor heating
- Could be omitted: guest room on ground floor
- Must have: high ceiling in living area, open kitchen, gallery
- Reason for design: combination of modern living concept and development plan requirements (only 1 full storey, mandatory attachment)
- Special features: despite semi-detached structure, a spacious feel through 6 m ceiling height and open gallery
I look forward to honest criticism and suggestions for improvement, especially regarding:
- Floor plan layout
- Lighting and window areas
- Proportions with 1.5 floors
- Practical everyday use (family with three children)
Thank you in advance for your feedback!
Best regards,
lucaskilam
During the day, I kept thinking about your more than 70 square meters (750 square feet), 6 meters (20 feet) high open-plan cube with the huge, strongly symmetrical window fronts. Personally, I think the space would overwhelm me. I can’t imagine feeling calm or cozy in a room like that. To me, it feels more like a factory hall.
Are you sure that’s what you want? Do you know similar houses, or have you spent extended time in one?
Are you sure that’s what you want? Do you know similar houses, or have you spent extended time in one?
N
nordanney10 Nov 2025 13:34Appearance is a matter of personal taste. I don't like the exterior of the house at all.
You are planning over 200 square meters (2,150 square feet) with a bathroom that has no natural daylight? The hallway upstairs is larger than a child’s bedroom. If you include a children's bathroom, the hallway upstairs will have no natural light. Unless you are vampires, the upper floor will be very dark. This is not what one would expect given the size and budget.
I share the concerns about the atmosphere and acoustics of the open living area with @wiltshire.
As for the ground floor, I believe @ypg already covered everything. The kitchen is very dark, as is the entrance and the room layout.
Somehow, I get the feeling that you enter the house through a basement.
You are planning over 200 square meters (2,150 square feet) with a bathroom that has no natural daylight? The hallway upstairs is larger than a child’s bedroom. If you include a children's bathroom, the hallway upstairs will have no natural light. Unless you are vampires, the upper floor will be very dark. This is not what one would expect given the size and budget.
I share the concerns about the atmosphere and acoustics of the open living area with @wiltshire.
As for the ground floor, I believe @ypg already covered everything. The kitchen is very dark, as is the entrance and the room layout.
Somehow, I get the feeling that you enter the house through a basement.
haydee schrieb:
You’re planning over 200 sqm (2,150 sq ft) and a bathroom without natural daylight?This could be avoided by incorporating skylights or roof windows.I'm a bit triggered by the extension of the open-plan living area designed as a split level. Somehow, it gives me the impression of a renovation of an old building with a modern extension that includes the open space. However, it's supposed to be a new build, just with an extension attached to the neighboring existing building.
I’m currently wondering why the utility rooms in the gable roof house are planned so carelessly, while the open-plan space has to stand out with a 6-meter (20 ft) ceiling height. Why is there such a blunt separation? If the garden, probably at the top of the plans facing southwest, is located there, why place the shower toilet and technical rooms on the south side, instead of situating the kitchen or dining area there? Then, if needed, use the windowless central wall for the utility rooms (at worst, even a windowless toilet) and put a shed roof on one half of the floor area, possibly with the children's rooms oriented to the south underneath?!
I’ll come back again to the question about the site plan and federal state.
N
nordanney10 Nov 2025 15:12haydee schrieb:
a bathroom without natural daylight?It will be a cozy sauna when all five need to shower at the same time... No ventilation system can handle that well enough. The shower on the ground floor is not a serious alternative.
Similar topics