ᐅ Floor plan design for a hillside house with 5 children's bedrooms
Created on: 17 Jun 2017 12:31
A
Arifas
Dear fellow contributors,
I’m sharing our first attempt at the floor plan. Unfortunately, I can’t fill out the list because copying it over on my phone doesn’t work properly, sorry.
Key data:
5 children between 0 and 11 years old
2 adults in their mid-thirties
Plot of about 900 sqm (9700 sq ft), facing north
Building window edge on the street side: 17.35 m (57 ft)
Sloped site; within the building window, the ground rises about 2 m (7 ft) over 10 m (33 ft) from front to back
We want 5 small children’s bedrooms, a slightly larger office for working from home, a master bedroom, three showers, three toilets, a bathtub, and access to the garden through the living room on the upper floor. One wall in the children’s rooms should be removable later.
The attic is walkable.
We are allowed to build 2 full stories, with a ridge height of about 12 m (39 ft) and an eave height of 11.6 m (38 ft).
We would prefer a hip roof.
The current drawing is 9.5 by 11 m (31 by 36 ft), but we would like to have around 195 to 205 sqm (2100 to 2200 sq ft) of living space later; garage or storage will be added.
The back wall of the house is embedded up to about 2 m (7 ft) into the slope.
I will try to attach a rough overview of the plot.
I’m sharing our first attempt at the floor plan. Unfortunately, I can’t fill out the list because copying it over on my phone doesn’t work properly, sorry.
Key data:
5 children between 0 and 11 years old
2 adults in their mid-thirties
Plot of about 900 sqm (9700 sq ft), facing north
Building window edge on the street side: 17.35 m (57 ft)
Sloped site; within the building window, the ground rises about 2 m (7 ft) over 10 m (33 ft) from front to back
We want 5 small children’s bedrooms, a slightly larger office for working from home, a master bedroom, three showers, three toilets, a bathtub, and access to the garden through the living room on the upper floor. One wall in the children’s rooms should be removable later.
The attic is walkable.
We are allowed to build 2 full stories, with a ridge height of about 12 m (39 ft) and an eave height of 11.6 m (38 ft).
We would prefer a hip roof.
The current drawing is 9.5 by 11 m (31 by 36 ft), but we would like to have around 195 to 205 sqm (2100 to 2200 sq ft) of living space later; garage or storage will be added.
The back wall of the house is embedded up to about 2 m (7 ft) into the slope.
I will try to attach a rough overview of the plot.
Arifas schrieb:
Completely without a house [emoji23]?!
But it's no longer about floor plan design.
I find it amazing how fast things are moving now.Yes.
Some prefer slab foundations.
Arifas schrieb:
Today the foundation slab was inspected and approved; it will be poured tomorrow. And the invoice from the excavation contractor arrived—6,000 euros less than expected [emoji106][emoji106]Usually, it’s the other way around.
I hope I don’t have to worry about this now [emoji23]
The soil report had indicated some rock in the rear area, so we expected an additional charge for different equipment. But there was no rock.
Less excavation was needed next to the house, and suddenly the total cost isn’t quite as high. Still, it’s a lot of money [emoji13]
The soil report had indicated some rock in the rear area, so we expected an additional charge for different equipment. But there was no rock.
Less excavation was needed next to the house, and suddenly the total cost isn’t quite as high. Still, it’s a lot of money [emoji13]
haydee schrieb:
Normally it’s the other way aroundOh, now I understand. You meant to pour first and then remove it. No, according to an external DEKRA inspector, it’s the other way around. Otherwise, you can’t properly check the interior of the panel. He inspected the steel framework inside, the grounding conductor (or whatever that thing is called), the drains, and the empty conduit for the air-to-water heat pump. He measured everything and took photos. Once it’s poured, you can no longer see these details or make corrections.