ᐅ Floor plan, post-and-beam construction, accessory dwelling unit, and existing building

Created on: 21 Feb 2023 20:48
B
BucheOnBoard
Hello everyone,
Currently, my father, my wife, and my child (under 1 year old) live in a small residential house from the 1950s with 61m² (655 sq ft) of living space. The property is owned 50/50 by my father and me but is still partly being paid off by my grandmother (my outstanding payments are held in a separate account and are therefore just a “pass-through” item, while my father pays his monthly installments from his income). The plot is in Hamburg Iserbrook and measures 681m² (7,333 sq ft) with a standard land value of €985.
Unsurprisingly, the space is becoming somewhat tight, even though we get along well. Furthermore, the health of the older housemate is declining, and the narrow staircase to the upper floor is already becoming difficult to manage.
The basic idea is this: I would receive the second half of the plot as a gift, debt-free. My father will continue paying off his installments until he inherits the remainder. In return, we will build him a nice accessory apartment with the corresponding right of residence (or usufruct right, which still needs to be clarified)—barrier-free and compact so he can live independently there for as long as possible. The rest of the ground floor would then only contain a multipurpose room, guest toilet, and hallway; upstairs four rooms and a bathroom. We would like a (simple) converted attic as a retreat area. To relieve the ground floor space and avoid fully using the building envelope (sealing of surfaces, etc.), we plan a basement, as there are also two space-intensive hobbies and a workshop desired for DIY projects. I will also build some of the furniture myself.

Now to the questionnaire:

Building Plan / Restrictions
Plot size: 681m² (7,333 sq ft) with existing house
Slope: No, but the area from the street level up to the terrace is filled +90cm (35 inches), the garage is at about +40cm (16 inches), the neighboring plot to the north also about +40cm (16 inches), and to the south approximately at street level
Floor area ratio (FAR): 0.4
Plot ratio (building coverage ratio): 0.4
Building envelope, building line, and boundaries: 5m (16.4 ft) setback to the street, then 15m (49.2 ft) deep, 2.5m (8.2 ft) setback on each side (more for taller buildings)
Edge development: Allowed (garages etc., max. wall height 3m (10 ft), max. length 9m (30 ft))
Number of parking spaces: We believe none are legally required; we plan to provide one for future use, for electric vehicle charging (currently not needed)
Number of floors: One full story; ALKIS shows some buildings apparently with two floors (see attachment)
Roof type: Not specified
Architectural style: Not specified
Orientation: Not specified
Maximum heights/limits: Not specified
Other requirements: No illuminated advertising signs 😉
The 1965 building plan mainly mandates “residential zoning only” and “one full story,” but even these rules seem flexible. There is a very large copper beech tree in the southeast corner of the plot, with an estimated crown diameter of 10m (33 ft) and at least 12-14m (39-46 ft) tall. The tree is to be preserved (it is unclear if it must officially be preserved with a new build). I expect that the new building must not come closer to the tree than the current building—about 2.5m (8.2 ft) from the trunk. The trunk itself is roughly 1.5m (5 ft) in diameter. A pruning plan is under discussion (also due to shading of the roof, planned for solar panels).

Owners' Requirements
Architectural style, roof shape, building type: Detached single-family home, gable roof with pitch >45°, rather long and narrow
Basement, number of floors: Yes to basement, 1.5 floors plus a converted attic
Number of occupants, ages: 4 (64 (gruff and private), 34, 31, under 1) Another child should be possible
Ground floor space needs: Open-plan area preferably with a small pantry, guest toilet
Accessory apartment with barrier-free design (walk-in shower, open living kitchen with sleeping niche). Can be small.
Shared hallway important (for potential care needs without going outside, access to joint basement with laundry facilities, etc.)
Upper floor space needs: 1 bedroom with a large bed and built-in closets but no extras, 3 rooms (1 child’s room, 1 office/child’s room, 1 guest/office (can be small)), 1 bathroom with a larger vanity, bathtub, and shower
Attic space needs: 2 “retreat” areas for the adults; if necessary, just a rocking chair with reading lamp and sewing machine on one side, and a gaming PC on the other. The current attic is an equilateral triangle with 2.1m (83 inches) side length; it doesn’t need to be much larger/wider/higher than that.
Basement space needs (access via shared hallway + additional exterior entrance): Technical room with heat pump, ventilation, electrical distribution, inverter, server; woodwork workshop; laundry room; 2 hobby cellars for large-format collections—Lego and beer cans, no kink-shaming please 😉 ; 1 storage room for decorations, suitcases, camping gear, etc. Must be heated (and ventilated), but simple tile flooring and surface-mounted installations are sufficient.
Office: Family use or home office? Home office about three times a week, plus one self-employed side business
Guest stays per year: 6–10, usually just one night, sometimes 2–3 nights
Open or closed design: Open on the ground floor but staircase not located in the living room/open space
Conservative or modern construction? I’m never quite sure of the difference, but I feel fully modern
Open kitchen, kitchen island: Yes, cooking often and joyfully, also with guests
Number of dining seats: 6; existing table extends to 14 seats for Christmas and birthdays
Fireplace: No, no chimney planned
Music/stereo wall: No
Balcony, roof terrace: No
Garage, carport: Carport/roof overhang directly at the building would be good, mainly for bikes and potentially for an electric vehicle in the (near) future. To my knowledge, Hamburg does not require parking spaces.
Vegetable garden, greenhouse: Maybe a small bed later, but not important at the moment
Other wishes/particularities/daily routine, including reasons for certain choices: Currently, leisure activities happen at the dining table, which is between sofa and TV (used about once a week), so large lounge furniture is not really needed. The tree is a critical factor, as it likely narrows the building envelope in the front area to about 6.5m (21 ft). We don’t want to move the house further back because of the garden.

House Design
Planner: Still in the very early idea phase. Overall, we think about 180m² (1,937 sq ft) of living space plus basement. We currently live as four on 61m² (655 sq ft) and can manage. We don’t need huge increases in room size, rather a spatial separation with the accessory apartment and space for hobbies and home office. Dressing rooms or a children’s bathroom are not planned.
Personal budget limit for house including fittings: €750,000–800,000 (USD amount varies), with much furniture available from the existing house. Demolition cost would be extra, but I see plenty of grants and rental expenses during construction period. €450,000 (about $480,000) equity is available; the plot described above would be fully paid off (worth almost €700,000 or approximately $750,000).
Preferred heating technology: Ground-source heat pump with deep borehole and 12–15kWp photovoltaic system plus centralized controlled residential ventilation with enthalpy heat exchanger

If you have to compromise, on which features/extensions
- What can you do without: Either attic conversion or guest-office room
- What you cannot do without: Basement

Why is the design like this? No design yet; we are still considering the orientation on the plot.
It will be a timber frame construction, a gable roof to fit well, knee wall about 1.3m (4.3 ft), roof pitch >45°. The current roof is 60° and gives it a rustic fairy-tale look. On the south side, we want nearly full photovoltaic coverage except for a few roof windows; on the north side, we can imagine a dormer also to integrate the staircase to the attic—maybe a cross-gable?
The rough idea is close to the volume of a Danwood Point 138.1, but a bit wider and longer, and “narrower at the front” (the east side facing the street) due to the tree. Plus an attic conversion with a steeper roof. Access via staircase on the north side.

Alternatively, separate accessory apartment in the south and main residence in the north, but that would split the already narrow house into even narrower parts.

We would like a local timber frame general contractor (any recommendations in the greater Hamburg area?).

Am I completely off track? Have I forgotten anything? Made any major mistakes besides not building three years ago? Are important details missing? Will it all turn out too cramped? Is the budget roughly realistic? Aside from a garden shed, I have no building experience but some electrical knowledge. Photovoltaics and networking could be done by me, full electrical installation I am allowed but would not be practical with a general contractor.

Or is the program so complex that an architect is absolutely necessary because a draftsman would be overwhelmed? From my research it seems that architects for single-family homes that are not villas are quite rare.

Thanks to everyone who made it this far! And even more thanks to those who share their opinions or ideas.

Attached are current ALKIS excerpt, aerial photo, and building plan excerpt, all oriented north and approximately the same section. I hope they are legible… Red borders and points mark the plot.
B
BucheOnBoard
22 Mar 2023 12:49
Since we want skylights, anything above a 1.5m (5 feet) knee wall seems difficult. However, with the house width and roof pitch, anything lower would significantly reduce the attic space, so I initially sketched it this way. So, either you climb the stairs bent over, or there is a dormer/skylight in that area to provide enough headroom at the top of the stairs. Or some other type of staircase.

According to ALKIS, some neighboring buildings are also two-story, even though they are in the same zoning plan area. So, if you don’t completely exceed the limits, something might be possible, but it would certainly be easier without that.
K a t j a22 Mar 2023 17:05
I think you should give up on the attic dream. You have a huge basement, and the upper floor is already quite large due to the granny flat. Why do you insist on using the attic space? In my opinion, the money would be better invested elsewhere. Installing a staircase here will always be difficult. The only option I can imagine is a spiral staircase, and even then, you’d probably only have about 2m (6.5 ft) depth where you can just stand upright.
B
BucheOnBoard
22 Mar 2023 18:05
Hmm, so the initial desired background is the current attic – it’s about 1.7 meters (5.5 feet) wide and just under 2 meters (6.5 feet) high with a 60° roof pitch, and it’s a very cozy bedroom and workspace. However, it can only be accessed by a ladder. Combined with the wish for both parents (that is, me and my wife) to each have their own room – not the kitchen or the office, but a room that doesn’t need tidying up, where you can slam the door if you feel like it.

But yes, maybe “my” room will have to be the workshop cellar after all, and instead of the room now taken up by the stairs, we’ll try to get the “sewing room” into the upper floor...

What did your start look like, @K a t j a?
K a t j a schrieb:

Actually, I started similarly but thought I’d wait to see your plan first.
K a t j a22 Mar 2023 18:42
I initially started with a similar approach but then discarded the idea of the quarter-spiral staircase. Ultimately, this is the design I settled on:


Floor plan of a building with several rooms, stairs, hallway, granny flat, and accessible bathroom.


Floor plan of a storey with stairwell, doors, and labeled rooms (bedroom, office, bathroom, kitchen, kitchen).


Architectural floor plan of a multi-storey building: stairwell, doors, and rooms with purple outlines.


I should mention that I haven’t optimized the dimensions much yet. I suspect there is room to reduce the size in some areas.
What was important to me:
- Granny flat living area facing south with an option for terraces. Accessible bathroom
- Main apartment with pantry
- Guest toilet with a window and a proper wardrobe closet
- Access to the attic – it needs to be calculated precisely whether the slope above the stairs requires a skylight or even a small dormer. I think a skylight might be sufficient. (Knee wall assumed at 1.5m (5 feet); that would already cover more than one story => special permit or the architect manages to solve the headroom differently.)

As you can see, the windows and terrace doors are not included yet – I got stuck on that. 😉
K
kbt09
22 Mar 2023 20:06
I have also already started, but so far only completed the ground floor. My approach is similar to @K a t j a, but with an external dimension of only 8.8 x 13 m (29 x 43 ft). The width of the plot at the front is just under 16 m (52 ft), and since there will be a garage/carport on the north side, I thought there should be some space left on the south side next to the setback from the boundary. That was my thinking on this.
B
BucheOnBoard
22 Mar 2023 21:22
I definitely find the staircase position interesting and will definitely experiment with it. However, regarding the exterior dimensions, I agree with @kbt09; going longer than 13m (43 feet) probably isn’t possible because of the tree, and I wouldn’t want it wider than about 8.5m (28 feet) either, mainly due to the terrace and carport. So, I’d gladly welcome input for dimensions in that range 😉

We’ve also moved away from the pantry, even though with the staircase position it really made good use of the narrow space behind it. Having a guest bathroom with a window is definitely pretty cool, thanks so much for that!

For the knee wall height, to keep it a single-story, it would need to be about 1.3m (4 feet 3 inches) high (if I haven’t miscalculated). That would be sufficient inside, but of course, it would make the stairs even more awkward. Another option would be to change the roof pitch, but I think that wouldn’t look as good. So, I’ll keep tinkering with it 🙂