Hello everyone,
I want to renovate my facade. Due to numerous plaster cracks, a full-surface reinforcing mesh will be embedded in the plaster and the facade will be painted.
I have been offered two systems:
1. The mesh is embedded using SM 700 pro, which also serves as the topcoat plaster. Finally, the facade is painted twice with silicone resin paint.
2. The mesh is embedded, then a colored topcoat plaster with a thickness of 2mm (0.08 inches) is applied.
Option 1 is about 15 percent cheaper. Does anyone have experience with method 1 or see any disadvantages?
I want to renovate my facade. Due to numerous plaster cracks, a full-surface reinforcing mesh will be embedded in the plaster and the facade will be painted.
I have been offered two systems:
1. The mesh is embedded using SM 700 pro, which also serves as the topcoat plaster. Finally, the facade is painted twice with silicone resin paint.
2. The mesh is embedded, then a colored topcoat plaster with a thickness of 2mm (0.08 inches) is applied.
Option 1 is about 15 percent cheaper. Does anyone have experience with method 1 or see any disadvantages?
B
Baumfachmann10 Feb 2018 18:42SM700 is fiber-reinforced and quite durable. With silicone resin paint, water drains off better (dries faster) and the growth of algae or moss is inhibited. Colored plaster has the advantage that if, for example, a scratch is caused by a parked bicycle, there is almost no color difference. Both options are good; personally, I would choose option 1, but not because it is cheaper.
G
ghostjumper11 Feb 2018 20:55SM 700 has a noticeably finer grain compared to a render with a 2mm (0.08 inch) grain size. Depending on the color shade, fine hairline cracks can become more visible, even with reinforcement underneath. Have you seen a sample of both top coats? The appearance differs significantly, and depending on the surface area, one may be more suitable than the other.
Similar topics