Since I received great support [here] earlier, I would like to describe what I hope will be the last major point of dispute and ask for your assistance:
Contractual move-in date: June 1, 2016
Completion of outdoor landscaping according to contract: June 15, 2016
When we had the handover on June 1, I asked whether the outdoor landscaping would be finished on time. The response was that it probably wouldn’t be achievable. The next day, I inquired again if there was an update on whether the landscaping could be done by June 19, as we planned to have a birthday celebration then. The site manager’s trivial comment was: “Maybe there will already be a layer of gravel.”
As expected, it did not happen. To this day, the entire outdoor landscaping is not completed — the curbs have been installed, but only a few days ago.
A small side note: On June 14, I happened to get in touch with someone who had ordered the same terrace slabs we had chosen. He strongly advised against them, saying he had only problems with those slabs. We then decided on different ones and informed the construction company. At that point, we did not even have a written offer for the terrace extension or the cost of the new slabs. On June 28 (!!), the site manager asked me again which slabs exactly we wanted so they could be ordered.
On Wednesday, July 6, the site manager was at our place again to discuss another defect. When I asked why the adjacent semi-detached house, which is unoccupied, already had its terrace paved but the pathway to our house was still bare, he snapped: “You changed your terrace slabs!” When I pointed out that at least the pathway could be done, he said nothing more. The neighbor’s terrace uses the same paving slabs as our pathways.
After I insisted with the workers, at least the entrance was paved since there was almost a half-meter (about 1.5 feet) height difference there. By the way, today the driveway to the garage was paved.
Yesterday, Thursday, we had an appointment with the construction company. They explained that the company and their representatives had set July 1, 2016, as the move-in date, and therefore July 15, 2016, for the outdoor landscaping.
We politely pointed out that this is not our problem, since our notarized contract states June 15. The contract also specifies that if payment is late, we would owe 5% interest on the amount due, but unfortunately, nothing is regulated in the opposite case.
Their reaction was just that things like this do happen and that they are on the safe side, etc.
We did receive an offer for the terrace yesterday.
The company owner wants to review the case calmly and get back to us. However, his son already hinted that he knows how his father will decide in this matter.
Now the interesting question: What would be considered a justified compensation? I have tentatively scheduled an appointment with a lawyer (next Friday), who of course expects payment upfront. I am trying to avoid that for now, but if they keep being inflexible, I will have to bite the bullet.
I would like to exclude the terrace from this, as it wouldn’t have been finished on time either with the other slabs anyway, since they hadn’t even been ordered.
Thank you very much and have a nice weekend.
Contractual move-in date: June 1, 2016
Completion of outdoor landscaping according to contract: June 15, 2016
When we had the handover on June 1, I asked whether the outdoor landscaping would be finished on time. The response was that it probably wouldn’t be achievable. The next day, I inquired again if there was an update on whether the landscaping could be done by June 19, as we planned to have a birthday celebration then. The site manager’s trivial comment was: “Maybe there will already be a layer of gravel.”
As expected, it did not happen. To this day, the entire outdoor landscaping is not completed — the curbs have been installed, but only a few days ago.
A small side note: On June 14, I happened to get in touch with someone who had ordered the same terrace slabs we had chosen. He strongly advised against them, saying he had only problems with those slabs. We then decided on different ones and informed the construction company. At that point, we did not even have a written offer for the terrace extension or the cost of the new slabs. On June 28 (!!), the site manager asked me again which slabs exactly we wanted so they could be ordered.
On Wednesday, July 6, the site manager was at our place again to discuss another defect. When I asked why the adjacent semi-detached house, which is unoccupied, already had its terrace paved but the pathway to our house was still bare, he snapped: “You changed your terrace slabs!” When I pointed out that at least the pathway could be done, he said nothing more. The neighbor’s terrace uses the same paving slabs as our pathways.
After I insisted with the workers, at least the entrance was paved since there was almost a half-meter (about 1.5 feet) height difference there. By the way, today the driveway to the garage was paved.
Yesterday, Thursday, we had an appointment with the construction company. They explained that the company and their representatives had set July 1, 2016, as the move-in date, and therefore July 15, 2016, for the outdoor landscaping.
We politely pointed out that this is not our problem, since our notarized contract states June 15. The contract also specifies that if payment is late, we would owe 5% interest on the amount due, but unfortunately, nothing is regulated in the opposite case.
Their reaction was just that things like this do happen and that they are on the safe side, etc.
We did receive an offer for the terrace yesterday.
The company owner wants to review the case calmly and get back to us. However, his son already hinted that he knows how his father will decide in this matter.
Now the interesting question: What would be considered a justified compensation? I have tentatively scheduled an appointment with a lawyer (next Friday), who of course expects payment upfront. I am trying to avoid that for now, but if they keep being inflexible, I will have to bite the bullet.
I would like to exclude the terrace from this, as it wouldn’t have been finished on time either with the other slabs anyway, since they hadn’t even been ordered.
Thank you very much and have a nice weekend.
W
winnetou7821 Sep 2017 10:39I like the stones more and more
Nordlys schrieb:
Sorry, but I don’t see anything wrong in the photo. Everything looks fine to me. Why a drain channel? A terrace always has a slight slope away from the house.
This is how a professionally constructed terrace from a landscape gardener looks here. Drain pipes are installed under the gravel both at the house and in front of the plant pots, the terrace has a slope, and there is a small step at the door, so water will definitely not enter the house. KarstenYou have a step and—I can’t quite tell—it’s probably a standard patio door with a frame at the bottom, right?
In that case, a drain channel is usually not necessary. For a flush door combined with a directly adjacent surface, in addition to the slope, a drainage channel is standard practice (I’m not sure if there is a specific norm for it). I would always install the channel if there’s no separate step in front of the door, whether it’s a flush or a slightly raised threshold.
Nordlys schrieb:
Sorry, but I don’t see anything wrong in the photo. What is “wrong” in the picture – unlike your opinion – is the floor-to-ceiling window with a flush threshold exit...
Google tip: "The forgotten connection"
B
Bieber081521 Sep 2017 13:29Nordlys schrieb:
Why a gutter? A terrace always has a slight slope away from the house.Because water combined with wind can flow uphill, a gutter is still appropriate unless there is a sufficiently high threshold.Similar topics