We have now finished the floor plans, and the electrical planning phase is starting. I expect there will be quite a few pencils and erasers used.
Do you have any tips on things that are often forgotten or important points to watch out for?
The basis will be the Busch-Jäger Free@Home system. In the first step, I want to plan the power outlets, then gradually the rest.
Do you have any tips on things that are often forgotten or important points to watch out for?
The basis will be the Busch-Jäger Free@Home system. In the first step, I want to plan the power outlets, then gradually the rest.
The bus system isn’t just for the Christmas lights...
Of course, many things can be wired conventionally—I don’t dispute that—but since you quickly reach certain limits, various types of bus systems were invented.
The reason for individual switching is that devices change over time: sometimes something new is added, sometimes something old is removed, and sometimes you just want to make different decisions… if everything can be switched individually, there are no restrictions.
For example, the projector wasn’t originally planned, but it was purchased because of the soccer World Cup… an additional network player wasn’t planned either, but now it’s placed under the TV…
That’s just my opinion… I wouldn’t do it any other way and also recommend it like this… but in the end, everyone has to decide for themselves which path they want to take.
Of course, many things can be wired conventionally—I don’t dispute that—but since you quickly reach certain limits, various types of bus systems were invented.
The reason for individual switching is that devices change over time: sometimes something new is added, sometimes something old is removed, and sometimes you just want to make different decisions… if everything can be switched individually, there are no restrictions.
For example, the projector wasn’t originally planned, but it was purchased because of the soccer World Cup… an additional network player wasn’t planned either, but now it’s placed under the TV…
That’s just my opinion… I wouldn’t do it any other way and also recommend it like this… but in the end, everyone has to decide for themselves which path they want to take.
Hello everyone,
Wireless charging of a smartphone or an electric toothbrush is not a problem. In these cases, the device to be charged is placed directly on the coupling coil. The magnetic circuit is technically limited to a few centimeters.
Now, imagine a house without wiring, where for example the energy for a stove with about 3 kW power would need to be transmitted via an electromagnetic field from the main supply to the stove!? I certainly wouldn’t want to be the neighbor in that case! And I wouldn’t want to think about the efficiency either. Or alternatively, iron laminations would have to be installed instead of copper wiring... According to current knowledge, this is rather not feasible.
Best regards,
Sven-W
Wireless charging of a smartphone or an electric toothbrush is not a problem. In these cases, the device to be charged is placed directly on the coupling coil. The magnetic circuit is technically limited to a few centimeters.
Now, imagine a house without wiring, where for example the energy for a stove with about 3 kW power would need to be transmitted via an electromagnetic field from the main supply to the stove!? I certainly wouldn’t want to be the neighbor in that case! And I wouldn’t want to think about the efficiency either. Or alternatively, iron laminations would have to be installed instead of copper wiring... According to current knowledge, this is rather not feasible.
Best regards,
Sven-W
Sven-W schrieb:
If you imagine a house without wiring, for example, the energy for a stove with around 3 kW power would have to be transmitted from the main supply to the stove via an electromagnetic field!? I wouldn’t want to be the neighbor! I also don’t want to think about the efficiency. Or you’d have to install stacks of iron sheets instead of copper wires... According to current knowledge, this is unlikely.
Regards, Sven by TapatalkI don’t think anyone intends that or meant it that way. If anything, it was about control! without cables. The losses from wireless power transmission are generally too high and only make sense over short distances or for minimal amounts of power (there are indeed applications, e.g. for sensors).
S
Sebastian7923 Dec 2015 20:10Yes, that’s how someone here meant it.