Hello dear forum,
For quite some time, we had been toying with the idea of extending our single-family home (built in 1962), which we purchased in 2014/15, and finally decided to start concrete planning with an architect based on our needs and ideas.
Background: We bought the house in 2014 in a “dilapidated” condition. With the help of friends, acquaintances, and generous tradespeople, we carried out a full renovation ourselves over three months (floors, plaster, electrical, water/sewage/heating pipes, bathrooms), alongside our regular jobs, completely transforming the property. So far, so good. Even then, we knew this wouldn’t be the end; with children arriving, we would sooner or later have to take action again.
The house is located right next to my parents-in-law, at the edge of a small woodland (forest to the south). Since we have a very good relationship with my wife’s parents and hardly used the side of the property facing them, my parents-in-law built a double garage (with two adjacent parking spaces) and a pool there in 2019 (which we didn’t really oppose). Building in that direction is therefore practically ruled out (because of the pool and garage). On the other side of the house (and shown in the basement plans) is the city of Bonn’s main water supply line with protective zones of 4m (13 feet) in both directions, which also significantly limits the extension area. Thus, we can effectively only extend on the existing footprint and towards the rear.
Here are the current plans of the property (consisting of basement – essentially a cellar –, ground floor, and upper floor). The house also has a converted attic but it is not worth mentioning.
Basement:
Ground Floor:
Upper Floor:
We have now lived in the house for several years and know our routines and needs quite well. Based on this, we have filled out the following form about our space requirements to share our needs as clearly as possible with you.
Building regulations / restrictions
Lot size –
1023 m2 (about 11,000 sq ft)
Slope:
No
Floor area ratio (FAR):
Not listed in the online zoning plan of the city of Bonn → Fits into the neighbourhood (smallest house on the street). The architect has already visited the street and gained a good overview.
Floor space index (FSI):
Same as floor area ratio
Building framework, building line, and boundary:
Existing building already slightly outside the building line due to protective zones of the Wahnbachtalsperre reservoir
Edge development:
Garage and pool added in 2019, coordinated with neighbours (parents-in-law) and approved by the city
(Plaster, floors, electrical, heating pipes, and water lines)
3
Number of stories:
Neighbouring houses all at least 2.5 stories
Roof style:
Various along the street: flat roof, shed roof, pitched roof
Architectural style:
Flexible
Orientation:
Terrace faces south
Maximum height / restrictions:
Considered by the architect; due to §§33/34 (local planning laws) there is quite a bit of “headroom” for height
Additional requirements
8m (26 ft) protective zone (4 m (13 ft) each side) to the main water supply line running through the property (marked in the basement plans).
Client requirements
Architectural style, roof type, building type
Existing building from 1962, fully renovated in 2015 (plaster, floors, electrical, heating pipes, and water lines) with DIY and tradespeople for specialist work
Extension of the existing living area (approx. 85 m2 (900 sq ft)) by adding an extension and changing the floor plans. Stylistically, we want a good mix of the original (classic 1962 house) with modern elements and a rather linear extension with lots of glass and natural light.
Basement, number of floors
Basement already exists and will be needed + flexible number of floors (to meet the relaxed family lifestyle we want)
Number and age of occupants
4 persons:
Parents (31/32 years)
Children (2 daughters, 3 and 1 years)
2 dogs
Space requirements on ground and upper floors
The ground floor should be the family living area with everything it entails (kitchen, dining room, living & daily living area)
The upper floor should have at least space for the girls with their own bathroom. There is already a large office room included.
The plans also include an attic, which will be expanded and developed. It will have room for the master bedroom, an en-suite bathroom, and a large roof terrace.
Office: family use or home office?
Used as a home office (both my wife and I work on laptops and can work from anywhere)
Guests overnight annually
Limited to few
Open or closed layout
We are quite flexible here; both have their advantages and disadvantages. Currently the ground and attic floors are rather open, the upper floor is more closed (children’s rooms, office, bathroom)
Conservative or modern construction
Rather modern construction with many windows and views into nature (the house is directly at the forest edge with green views)
Open kitchen, kitchen island
The kitchen is already quite open with a passageway to the living/dining area. We want to maintain this for communication with guests (we like to entertain) or to create a lively atmosphere in the ground floor (“family living space”). We currently plan to expand the kitchen by 110–120 cm (43–47 inches) towards the terrace/dining room area with a half-island for workspace, buffet, counter, or coffee bar.
Number of dining seats
Daily use for 4, about 15 for Christmas, around 8 for regular guest evenings
Fireplace
Still considering, depending on budget.
Music / stereo wall
No
Balcony, roof terrace
Roof terrace in the attic adjacent to the bedroom (for mild summer evenings with a good glass of wine). A balcony/terrace on the ground floor is planned to extend family and guest space and allow outdoor dining in summer.
Garage, carport
Well covered due to existing basement garage and a new garage built in 2020 with two parking spaces in front
Utility garden, greenhouse
Not needed or partially already developed on the property over the last 7 years (small beds and a chicken coop with run)
Other wishes / special features / daily routine, also reasons why certain things should or should not be included
We want to design the house so that it suits our family’s needs for the next 20 years.
Additionally, we have considered designing the house so it could be divided into two separate living units (in case we live abroad for longer periods or need less space as we age, enabling rental possibilities). Access to the second unit would be via an external staircase on the right side of the building.
Living Unit 1 (LU1) would be the entire ground floor plus stairs to the upper floor and the directly adjacent room and bathroom. This area would be separated off in the hallway.
Living Unit 2 (LU2) would then be the other half of the upper floor plus the entire attic with roof terrace.
From our perspective, both units would be fully functional and rentable. LU1 would be more than sufficient for us in old age.
House design
Who designed the plans:
Architect, based on our wishes and partially for sustainability reasons planned as timber frame construction.
What do you like most? Why?
Overall, the amount of windows/glass facing the forest. The location was a major plus for us at the time (end of the street bordering a small forest).
The attic with the terrace is also very appealing. The office on the upper floor is great and can be shared by both of us (possibly adding a partition wall). The open kitchen towards the dining room and the additional balcony are also very nice.
What do you like least? Why?
The access to the potential second unit via the external staircase is currently not ideal but is, in our view, the best solution for having two separate units in the future.
Price estimate according to architect/planner:
Our architect currently estimates roughly €250,000 to €300,000 (complete work by tradespeople)
Personal budget limit for the house including fittings:
We originally bought the house for €280,000. For the extension, we want to take on no more than an additional €150,000 in debt. We currently have about €50,000 in equity saved and are looking to benefit from the anticipated reactivation of the KfW 261/262 programs (according to the energy expert/architect just a matter of time), which could mean an additional €60,000 or €120,000 for the two-unit expansion.
Preferred heating technology:
We currently have an oil heating system. We want and will replace it as part of the renovation. This is not yet finalized with the architect/energy expert. We also want to install photovoltaics or solar thermal systems depending on feasibility and budget. Most likely, it will end up being pellets.
The overall goal is renovation to a KfW 70 EE standard (energy-efficient house).
If you have to give up something, which details/extensions can you do without?
- What can you do without: Only what is necessary.
- What can’t you do without: Anything that gives us a lot of living space for “little” money.
Why is the design the way it is now?
The design is based on ideas and wishes that have accumulated over the years, constantly reassessed and then finally incorporated into the briefing for the architect. The house cannot be demolished because of the garage and pool built by the parents-in-law, and we stand by that.
For various reasons, we prefer to build the extension as timber frame construction.
What is the most important/fundamental question about the floor plan in 130 characters?
Are we overcomplicating things with the house and planned extension, or is this the “best possible” solution given our needs, wishes, and budget?
Here are the architect’s current plans, which show a lot. The “oversized” post supports the roof load to cantilever around the corner in front of the garage (the building authority and the Wahnbachtalsperre have indicated they would prefer if the post installed by the previous owner under the terrace disappeared).
Ground Floor:
Upper Floor:
Attic:
For quite some time, we had been toying with the idea of extending our single-family home (built in 1962), which we purchased in 2014/15, and finally decided to start concrete planning with an architect based on our needs and ideas.
Background: We bought the house in 2014 in a “dilapidated” condition. With the help of friends, acquaintances, and generous tradespeople, we carried out a full renovation ourselves over three months (floors, plaster, electrical, water/sewage/heating pipes, bathrooms), alongside our regular jobs, completely transforming the property. So far, so good. Even then, we knew this wouldn’t be the end; with children arriving, we would sooner or later have to take action again.
The house is located right next to my parents-in-law, at the edge of a small woodland (forest to the south). Since we have a very good relationship with my wife’s parents and hardly used the side of the property facing them, my parents-in-law built a double garage (with two adjacent parking spaces) and a pool there in 2019 (which we didn’t really oppose). Building in that direction is therefore practically ruled out (because of the pool and garage). On the other side of the house (and shown in the basement plans) is the city of Bonn’s main water supply line with protective zones of 4m (13 feet) in both directions, which also significantly limits the extension area. Thus, we can effectively only extend on the existing footprint and towards the rear.
Here are the current plans of the property (consisting of basement – essentially a cellar –, ground floor, and upper floor). The house also has a converted attic but it is not worth mentioning.
Basement:
Ground Floor:
Upper Floor:
We have now lived in the house for several years and know our routines and needs quite well. Based on this, we have filled out the following form about our space requirements to share our needs as clearly as possible with you.
Building regulations / restrictions
Lot size –
1023 m2 (about 11,000 sq ft)
Slope:
No
Floor area ratio (FAR):
Not listed in the online zoning plan of the city of Bonn → Fits into the neighbourhood (smallest house on the street). The architect has already visited the street and gained a good overview.
Floor space index (FSI):
Same as floor area ratio
Building framework, building line, and boundary:
Existing building already slightly outside the building line due to protective zones of the Wahnbachtalsperre reservoir
Edge development:
Garage and pool added in 2019, coordinated with neighbours (parents-in-law) and approved by the city
(Plaster, floors, electrical, heating pipes, and water lines)
3
Number of stories:
Neighbouring houses all at least 2.5 stories
Roof style:
Various along the street: flat roof, shed roof, pitched roof
Architectural style:
Flexible
Orientation:
Terrace faces south
Maximum height / restrictions:
Considered by the architect; due to §§33/34 (local planning laws) there is quite a bit of “headroom” for height
Additional requirements
8m (26 ft) protective zone (4 m (13 ft) each side) to the main water supply line running through the property (marked in the basement plans).
Client requirements
Architectural style, roof type, building type
Existing building from 1962, fully renovated in 2015 (plaster, floors, electrical, heating pipes, and water lines) with DIY and tradespeople for specialist work
Extension of the existing living area (approx. 85 m2 (900 sq ft)) by adding an extension and changing the floor plans. Stylistically, we want a good mix of the original (classic 1962 house) with modern elements and a rather linear extension with lots of glass and natural light.
Basement, number of floors
Basement already exists and will be needed + flexible number of floors (to meet the relaxed family lifestyle we want)
Number and age of occupants
4 persons:
Parents (31/32 years)
Children (2 daughters, 3 and 1 years)
2 dogs
Space requirements on ground and upper floors
The ground floor should be the family living area with everything it entails (kitchen, dining room, living & daily living area)
The upper floor should have at least space for the girls with their own bathroom. There is already a large office room included.
The plans also include an attic, which will be expanded and developed. It will have room for the master bedroom, an en-suite bathroom, and a large roof terrace.
Office: family use or home office?
Used as a home office (both my wife and I work on laptops and can work from anywhere)
Guests overnight annually
Limited to few
Open or closed layout
We are quite flexible here; both have their advantages and disadvantages. Currently the ground and attic floors are rather open, the upper floor is more closed (children’s rooms, office, bathroom)
Conservative or modern construction
Rather modern construction with many windows and views into nature (the house is directly at the forest edge with green views)
Open kitchen, kitchen island
The kitchen is already quite open with a passageway to the living/dining area. We want to maintain this for communication with guests (we like to entertain) or to create a lively atmosphere in the ground floor (“family living space”). We currently plan to expand the kitchen by 110–120 cm (43–47 inches) towards the terrace/dining room area with a half-island for workspace, buffet, counter, or coffee bar.
Number of dining seats
Daily use for 4, about 15 for Christmas, around 8 for regular guest evenings
Fireplace
Still considering, depending on budget.
Music / stereo wall
No
Balcony, roof terrace
Roof terrace in the attic adjacent to the bedroom (for mild summer evenings with a good glass of wine). A balcony/terrace on the ground floor is planned to extend family and guest space and allow outdoor dining in summer.
Garage, carport
Well covered due to existing basement garage and a new garage built in 2020 with two parking spaces in front
Utility garden, greenhouse
Not needed or partially already developed on the property over the last 7 years (small beds and a chicken coop with run)
Other wishes / special features / daily routine, also reasons why certain things should or should not be included
We want to design the house so that it suits our family’s needs for the next 20 years.
Additionally, we have considered designing the house so it could be divided into two separate living units (in case we live abroad for longer periods or need less space as we age, enabling rental possibilities). Access to the second unit would be via an external staircase on the right side of the building.
Living Unit 1 (LU1) would be the entire ground floor plus stairs to the upper floor and the directly adjacent room and bathroom. This area would be separated off in the hallway.
Living Unit 2 (LU2) would then be the other half of the upper floor plus the entire attic with roof terrace.
From our perspective, both units would be fully functional and rentable. LU1 would be more than sufficient for us in old age.
House design
Who designed the plans:
Architect, based on our wishes and partially for sustainability reasons planned as timber frame construction.
What do you like most? Why?
Overall, the amount of windows/glass facing the forest. The location was a major plus for us at the time (end of the street bordering a small forest).
The attic with the terrace is also very appealing. The office on the upper floor is great and can be shared by both of us (possibly adding a partition wall). The open kitchen towards the dining room and the additional balcony are also very nice.
What do you like least? Why?
The access to the potential second unit via the external staircase is currently not ideal but is, in our view, the best solution for having two separate units in the future.
Price estimate according to architect/planner:
Our architect currently estimates roughly €250,000 to €300,000 (complete work by tradespeople)
Personal budget limit for the house including fittings:
We originally bought the house for €280,000. For the extension, we want to take on no more than an additional €150,000 in debt. We currently have about €50,000 in equity saved and are looking to benefit from the anticipated reactivation of the KfW 261/262 programs (according to the energy expert/architect just a matter of time), which could mean an additional €60,000 or €120,000 for the two-unit expansion.
Preferred heating technology:
We currently have an oil heating system. We want and will replace it as part of the renovation. This is not yet finalized with the architect/energy expert. We also want to install photovoltaics or solar thermal systems depending on feasibility and budget. Most likely, it will end up being pellets.
The overall goal is renovation to a KfW 70 EE standard (energy-efficient house).
If you have to give up something, which details/extensions can you do without?
- What can you do without: Only what is necessary.
- What can’t you do without: Anything that gives us a lot of living space for “little” money.
Why is the design the way it is now?
The design is based on ideas and wishes that have accumulated over the years, constantly reassessed and then finally incorporated into the briefing for the architect. The house cannot be demolished because of the garage and pool built by the parents-in-law, and we stand by that.
For various reasons, we prefer to build the extension as timber frame construction.
What is the most important/fundamental question about the floor plan in 130 characters?
Are we overcomplicating things with the house and planned extension, or is this the “best possible” solution given our needs, wishes, and budget?
Here are the architect’s current plans, which show a lot. The “oversized” post supports the roof load to cantilever around the corner in front of the garage (the building authority and the Wahnbachtalsperre have indicated they would prefer if the post installed by the previous owner under the terrace disappeared).
Ground Floor:
Upper Floor:
Attic:
A
aw39_bonn6 Feb 2022 19:22Myrna_Loy schrieb:
Completely subjective, I know.
But: well, a modest settlement house in the front, and a flashy chalet at the back. To me, that just doesn’t fit. The side view actually looks like an indoor ski slope.
I also suspect that a demolition and rebuild would be cheaper than properly connecting the extension to the original building. What needs to be said about this:
The footprint does not change at all; it remains 8x8m (26x26 ft), although the pictures might suggest otherwise due to differences in zoom level and angle.
I understand your point about the difference between the front and back, but I actually preferred to keep the front understated. Calling it a “flashy chalet” seems a bit exaggerated to me, given the total living area of only 160m² (1,722 sq ft). I also find the side view a bit challenging myself. Maybe you have a good idea?
Demolition and rebuild: Unrealistic. At 160m² (1,722 sq ft) and 2000 euros per square meter, that already amounts to 320,000 euros, not including additional construction-related costs, demolition fees, and the displeasure of my in-laws 😉
Myrna_Loy schrieb:
Sorry, this is subjective, but I have never actually said out loud “Oh, how ugly” when seeing a forum post here.Myrna_Loy schrieb:
But? Well, a modest suburban house at the front, and a flashy chalet at the back. To me, that doesn’t fit together at all. The side view looks like an indoor ski hall.At first, I thought: “I didn’t know Herman Munster became an architect” LOL* – but then I saw the plans are already three years and four months old. It’s understandable to still need a night to think it over before actually building it like that. Somehow, it looks like a roof tent on top of a Trabant 🙂https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
aw39_bonn schrieb:
I liked the idea of keeping it subtle and unobtrusive at the front. I wouldn’t do that unless it’s really necessary.A
aw39_bonn7 Feb 2022 06:1111ant schrieb:
At first, I thought: "I didn’t know Herman Munster became an architect" LOL* – but then I saw that the plans are already three years and four months old. It’s understandable that you’d still want to sleep on it for a night before actually building it. Somehow it looks like a roof tent on a Trabant 🙂The designs are actually quite recent; the date only comes from the sun studies.
Overall, we planned the rooms that we find practical and necessary; the external shape is basically a consequence of that.
Do you have any ideas on how this could be solved differently?
A
aw39_bonn7 Feb 2022 06:14K a t j a schrieb:
I wouldn’t do that unless it’s absolutely necessary. Redesigning the front or switching the entire roof to a flat roof would significantly increase the costs.
What would be your approach to redesigning the front? If I understand correctly, most people here seem to struggle with the combination of roof styles at the front and back?
H
HilfeHilfe7 Feb 2022 06:22Where has the old house gone? Demolition and rebuild?
Somehow, I can’t recognize the old house in the photo of the new one.
Somehow, I can’t recognize the old house in the photo of the new one.
Similar topics