ᐅ Basement versus Increased Living Space on the Ground Floor

Created on: 19 Apr 2022 20:36
H
HalloClarissa
Dear all,

We are planning to build a bungalow with 3 rooms and about 85 sqm (915 sq ft) of living space. Since the plot is on a slope, we need to build with a partial basement.

Which option would likely be more cost-effective:

1. Living area on the ground floor (including a guest room) of 85 sqm (915 sq ft) and a 50 sqm (538 sq ft) basement used mainly as a utility cellar with a technical room (then we would only need one bathroom).

2. Ground floor only 75 sqm (808 sq ft), guest room in the partially finished 50 sqm (538 sq ft) basement as living space (which would require a second bathroom but could be fitted out later by ourselves).

As soon as the basement is meant to have living space, the access routes must be heated and insulated. Also, an internal staircase is necessary. A purely utility basement could possibly be accessed only from outside without an internal staircase, saving space.

Theoretically, a room on the ground floor requires about 12 sqm (129 sq ft). If this room is located in the basement, additional space for stairs on both floors and another hallway is needed, approximately 24 sqm (258 sq ft).

Am I thinking about this correctly?

Has anyone calculated a similar case before?

Leeres Baugrundstück mit gelbem, gebogenen Schutzrohr am Boden; Hintergrund Häuserzeile.
HalloClarissa20 Apr 2022 18:33
ypg schrieb:

To start thinking about how you can arrive at an affordable solution, it’s important to check what the zoning plan says and what the site plan indicates regarding the blue line or property boundary. It looks to me like there is only a building zone?
However, you still need to know if there are any restrictions.

Unfortunately, I don’t have more information; the new development area has not yet been fully surveyed.

Site plan of the construction project with color-coded areas, outlines, and cross-sectional drawings.


Rectangular plot with red boundary lines; area 567 m² (6100 sq ft), parcel no. 128.


Site plan with color-coded building area and legend on the right, Annex 2 to submission 463/XVII
HalloClarissa20 Apr 2022 18:36
HalloClarissa schrieb:

Unfortunately, I don’t have more information, as the new development area has not yet been fully surveyed.

Unfortunately, I am unable to upload the entire PDF document here.

Document page: text sections about building ground, foundation, and sinkhole risk (category 3).


Excerpt of a planning page with text about sinkhole risk and construction measures for stabilization.


Document page with section 1.2 Height of buildings (§16 Building Use Ordinance) and body text.


Excerpt from a legal text on building methods, ancillary structures, and traffic areas (Building Code/Building Use Ordinance).


Document page with headings and paragraphs on access roads and flood protection.
gutentag20 Apr 2022 18:36
HalloClarissa schrieb:

I’m a bit puzzled by the comment “or is the budget already too tight for a ruler” – what’s that supposed to mean? If you’re worried about my financing: thanks, but that’s not necessary, I don’t need to take out any more loans.
Regarding the property marked by finger on the photo… unfortunately, my phone doesn’t have more advanced tools.

I don’t have detailed documents yet, as the extended soil survey is still pending and the building plot hasn’t been finally measured. At the moment, I’m planning based on the zoning plan and the drawing I already posted here.
But that doesn’t necessarily relate to my original question.

Sorry for the irony. I probably forgot to add a winking emoji 😉

If you think that’s unrelated to your question, then what else could it be besides the slope and your roughly marked property boundaries?
I have concerns about your planning since the slope is not exactly uniform. I would gladly prepare an overview with property boundaries and contour lines, but I lack reference points. So unfortunately, I can’t assist with that.

What does the geoportal say about the property boundaries?
HalloClarissa20 Apr 2022 18:40
askforafriend schrieb:

Why? The plot is suitable. Just build a basement under the bungalow, done. There wouldn’t even be any discussion for me. Go to a turnkey provider, get a detailed cost estimate. Then you have a number. Then ask how much filling in costs. Then you have another number. Compare them. Done.

I thought the same: a bungalow with a basement underneath. But I would like to hear experiences regarding which is more cost-effective: a partial/living basement or a purely utility basement with a larger house footprint.
HalloClarissa20 Apr 2022 18:43
gutentag schrieb:

Sorry for the irony. I guess I forgot to add a 😉

If you think this doesn’t relate to your question, then what does – the slope or your inaccurately drawn property boundaries?
I have concerns about your planning because the slope isn’t evenly graded. I would gladly prepare an overview showing the property lines and contour lines, since I lack reference points. Unfortunately, I can’t help further without those.

What does the geoportal say about the property boundaries?

Unfortunately, it hasn’t been surveyed yet. But from my roughly drawn outline, you can already see that the slope does not run evenly toward the northern boundary, but rather diagonally toward the northeast.

Geological map with colored layers (blue/orange/yellow) and red markings describing the location.
HalloClarissa20 Apr 2022 18:47
HalloClarissa schrieb:

Unfortunately, it has not been surveyed yet. However, you can already see from my irregular boundary line that the slope does not run evenly towards the northern border but diagonally towards the northeast.

Here again, in better quality – I really don’t have anything else yet

Technical map with orange zones, contour lines, residential area circles, and overlay symbols.


Map legend: Explanation of building and traffic areas (residential area, public green space, road).