ᐅ Approval of the rough site survey report: who is responsible for this?
Created on: 4 Dec 2021 16:54
M
MartinS_NKM
MartinS_NK4 Dec 2021 16:54Hello everyone,
We have a conflict where the parties involved (surveyor, architect, construction manager) have different opinions.
The surveyor (or one of his employees) carried out the rough staking and now wants written approval of the staking report. The rough staking protocol includes a signature line. Only after this written approval will he perform the fine staking.
Neither the architect nor the construction manager want to countersign and instead require the surveyor to approve it (self-inspection).
The question is: who is responsible for approving the rough staking report? Is there a common or clear regulation?
Thank you very much for your support and best regards,
Martin
We have a conflict where the parties involved (surveyor, architect, construction manager) have different opinions.
The surveyor (or one of his employees) carried out the rough staking and now wants written approval of the staking report. The rough staking protocol includes a signature line. Only after this written approval will he perform the fine staking.
Neither the architect nor the construction manager want to countersign and instead require the surveyor to approve it (self-inspection).
The question is: who is responsible for approving the rough staking report? Is there a common or clear regulation?
Thank you very much for your support and best regards,
Martin
M
MartinS_NK4 Dec 2021 20:50The surveyor was commissioned by my wife and me as the clients.
MayrCh schrieb:
But @Escroda can surely provide more solid input. You meant to say "could have." Alienating key accounts is truly an art form...
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Similar topics