ᐅ Looking for alternatives to speaker connection outlets in the living room
Created on: 14 Sep 2017 14:37
G
G-Star1988G
G-Star198814 Sep 2017 14:37Hello everyone,
I am currently planning my speaker wiring and selecting the individual components needed. Initially, I wanted to use the speaker connection outlets from our switch system (Jung LS990), but there are only stereo connection outlets available. This means that in each corner, two speaker connections would be occupied, and two would remain free. Visually, that’s not very appealing. Using a different switch system might also stand out, for example if I chose ones from Gira.
Do you have any recommendations for connection outlets? I need speaker cables, RCA (phono), and HDMI.
How large did you plan the conduit? Is a 40mm (1.6 inch) conduit sufficient for cables with 2.5mm (0.1 inch) thickness plus HDMI and RCA?
I am currently planning my speaker wiring and selecting the individual components needed. Initially, I wanted to use the speaker connection outlets from our switch system (Jung LS990), but there are only stereo connection outlets available. This means that in each corner, two speaker connections would be occupied, and two would remain free. Visually, that’s not very appealing. Using a different switch system might also stand out, for example if I chose ones from Gira.
Do you have any recommendations for connection outlets? I need speaker cables, RCA (phono), and HDMI.
How large did you plan the conduit? Is a 40mm (1.6 inch) conduit sufficient for cables with 2.5mm (0.1 inch) thickness plus HDMI and RCA?
T
toxicmolotof14 Sep 2017 23:50We have Jung AS500; the technology behind it, meaning the contacts, are the same.
What you are referring to, we also have, but we don’t notice it. And that is for two reasons:
1) We tend to look past it.
2) The speakers are installed in such a way that the connection box behind them is, at best, barely or not visible at all.
Unfortunately, I am currently on vacation, otherwise I would have shown you a photo. Although… here, they happen to be visible. I no longer notice this “issue.”

What you are referring to, we also have, but we don’t notice it. And that is for two reasons:
1) We tend to look past it.
2) The speakers are installed in such a way that the connection box behind them is, at best, barely or not visible at all.
Unfortunately, I am currently on vacation, otherwise I would have shown you a photo. Although… here, they happen to be visible. I no longer notice this “issue.”
G
G-Star198815 Sep 2017 09:49Thanks. Apparently, I am the only one bothered by this, otherwise there would be more participation here.
D
Deliverer15 Sep 2017 10:32Isn’t the box itself the much bigger visual distraction? Whether one or another outlet is unused doesn’t really make it worse, does it? And aren’t there even blanking plates available?
In my opinion, it’s more important to match the wall color to the color of the box and plan the position so that it’s as inconspicuous as possible. Behind proper enclosures, you can even hide entire pieces of furniture (provided the WAF is high enough).
In my opinion, it’s more important to match the wall color to the color of the box and plan the position so that it’s as inconspicuous as possible. Behind proper enclosures, you can even hide entire pieces of furniture (provided the WAF is high enough).
S
Steffen8015 Sep 2017 10:36toxicmolotow schrieb:
We use Jung AS500, but the underlying technology—the contacts themselves—are the same.
What you’re mentioning, we also have, but we don’t notice it. And that’s for two reasons:
1) You tend to ignore it.
2) The speakers are installed in such a way that ideally you can hardly or not at all see the connection box behind them.
Unfortunately, I’m on vacation right now, otherwise I would have shown you a photo. Although... here they are by chance. I no longer notice this "problem.”
Sorry, but that looks awful. It’s just not acceptable. In our case, the cables come straight out of a 20mm (3/4 inch) conduit directly into the box.
Similar topics