Hello!
I'll start.
Heated area 200m2 (2,153 sq ft)
KfW 55 standard
Mechanical ventilation with heat recovery
Current outdoor temperature 6°C (43°F)
Heating energy consumption including hot water 35 kWh
Electricity consumption 9 kWh
COP 3.88
I'll start.
Heated area 200m2 (2,153 sq ft)
KfW 55 standard
Mechanical ventilation with heat recovery
Current outdoor temperature 6°C (43°F)
Heating energy consumption including hot water 35 kWh
Electricity consumption 9 kWh
COP 3.88
Alessandro schrieb:
But what’s the point of working with ERR to save energy if I still have to operate at 40°C (104°F) supply temperature to heat the house?Have you tried fully opening all the ERRs and lowering the heating curve?Bookstar schrieb:
That contradicts all physics and heating technology. Higher supply temperatures significantly increase consumption, especially with a heat pump.Maybe I’m thinking about it wrong because my heat pump is return-temperature controlled. The supply temperature is reached relatively quickly. From a consumption perspective, the jump from a supply temperature of 30°C (86°F) to 33°C (91°F) takes about 15 minutes. When dealing with 2 kWh, that’s negligible. What takes longer, of course, is reaching the target return temperature.But that only happens once because the temperature level then adjusts relative to the return temperature.
T
T_im_Norden10 Feb 2021 08:11The hydraulics of an underfloor heating system are not simple; sometimes minimal adjustments can have significant effects. I am currently throttling the circuits, and yesterday a slight reduction in one circuit caused the entire heat distribution to become unbalanced.
Daniel-Sp schrieb:
Of course, the supply temperature also affects the efficiency, which can be seen in the performance charts of heat pumps. These are usually specified for 35°C (95°F) and 55°C (131°F) heating water temperatures. And indeed, the COP is lower at the same air temperature when the heating water is 55°C (131°F) compared to 35°C (95°F).
What type of heat pump does @Zaba12 have? Modulating or fixed-speed? Fixed
Are you able to track the heat demand over a longer period? For my home, I get about 18,000 kWh per year including hot water. From the energy performance certificate, I read 25 kWh/m² plus hot water. When I calculate it that way, I get around 10,000 kWh per year. Of course, that’s an idealized calculation method. They also assume a dry building, etc. But my actual consumption is 80% higher. That surprises me.
T
T_im_Norden10 Feb 2021 08:31I have already explained what information is needed to comment on this. Without providing data, it is not possible to say anything.
D
Daniel-Sp10 Feb 2021 08:59Bookstar schrieb:
Can you actually read out the heat demand over a longer period? For my place, it comes to 18,000 kWh per year including hot water. From the energy certificate, I see 25 kWh/m² (8 kBtu/ft²) plus hot water. When I calculate it that way, I come to about 10,000 kWh per year. Certainly, that is an idealized calculation. They also assume a dry building, etc. But I am 80% above that, which surprises me. The data from the energy certificate are worthless; they only reflect the actual consumption inadequately. For example, the quality of the floor heating design is not considered at all in the energy certificate.
Similar topics