ᐅ Do you notice any difference between the old and new KALLAX?

Hello everyone, I am currently looking into the IKEA KALLAX and wondering if you have noticed any differences between the older, so-called "old" KALLAX models and the newer versions, or if you have any experience with them? I am referring to aspects like material quality, workmanship, dimensions, and possibly small design changes or features such as stability, connectors, or ease of assembly. This is interesting to me because I am trying to decide whether the price difference for a new purchase is justified or if I should rather go for a used older model. It would be great if you could share your experiences, ideally with a comparison based on direct use. Thanks in advance!

Hello Annia65,

I have both older and newer KALLAX shelves in use and can share some differences I’ve noticed.

For one, IKEA has replaced the back panels of some newer KALLAX versions with thinner cardboard, which can somewhat affect stability. Older models had slightly sturdier back panels, which is especially noticeable when attaching shelves to the wall or storing heavy items.

Also, I think the dimensions have changed slightly, particularly in depth: newer models are sometimes a bit shallower, which can be practical for certain uses but also impacts stability.

The surfaces have become smoother and glossier, giving a more modern look, but they are also more prone to scratches.

One point about assembly: newer KALLAX models sometimes have improved connection mechanisms, making the setup a bit easier than before.

Overall, there are quite a few differences, but both versions are suitable for normal household use. It’s best to consider what you need the shelf for and how much weight it needs to support.

klo61 schrieb:
Newer KALLAX versions have replaced some of the back panels with thinner cardboard

This is an important point that I can confirm. I have noticed that the stability of the newer models is somewhat reduced due to the thinner back panel, especially if the shelving unit is not fixed to a wall.

Another difference is the composition of the laminate material: the new KALLAX shelves are lighter, which is likely due to the use of thinner or more modern particle boards. This naturally allows IKEA to save on shipping and material costs.

Personally, I consider the older models to be more durable. If longevity is important to you, I think this is a significant factor to consider. Perhaps you can compare them in-store if that is an option for you.

Hi Annia65,

I would like to take a more systematic approach to the differences, since your question covers not only the subjective impression but also details about processing and construction.

1. Material quality: Older KALLAX models were made with slightly thicker engineered wood panels, which provided more stability. The newer shelves often use thinner and sometimes softer particleboard, which can lead to easier sagging, especially in narrow shelves.

2. Dimensions: The external dimensions have actually changed slightly; for example, new models are sometimes a few millimeters narrower or shallower. This affects the fit of inserts and boxes.

3. Back panel: As already mentioned, the back panel on newer versions is made from thinner cardboard and is less sturdy. This makes the shelf overall a bit more flexible but also more prone to twisting.

4. Assembly: IKEA has indeed made improvements here, such as simpler connectors and clearer instructions. This is definitely an advantage for beginners.

5. Appearance and surface: New KALLAX models often have a slightly finer and glossier finish, which is also more sensitive to scratches.

My recommendation: If you want to move or transport the shelf frequently, the newer models have an advantage due to their lighter weight. For stationary, heavily loaded applications, older models are better suited.

fredle schrieb:
New shelves often use thinner and sometimes softer particle boards, which can lead to bending more easily, especially with narrow shelves.

I completely agree. I experienced exactly that: my new KALLAX is lighter, but you can definitely feel it give way under heavier loads.

I also noticed that older KALLAX units were sometimes assembled with larger screws, which helps connect the parts more securely. Newer models rely more on clips and small plastic dowels, which make assembly faster but don’t seem as sturdy.

For anyone who uses the shelf frequently or wants to store heavier items, I would recommend the older model or at least check carefully where it will be used.

I’ll keep it brief: the new KALLAX units are lighter and easier to assemble, but also more sensitive to load and moisture. The depth has been slightly reduced, which is practical for small spaces.