ᐅ Initial Floor Plan Draft – Backyard Development – 1.5 Stories

Created on: 15 Oct 2025 14:31
S
Steiger
Hello everyone,

we would like to present our first floor plan draft and kindly ask for your honest feedback.
The house is designed for 2 adults plus potentially 2 children in the future and will be built on a rural plot of land. We are currently in the design phase and welcome all constructive comments and suggestions for improvement.
The plot is a backyard development, which means there are some restrictions. For example, we are not allowed to exceed a length of 7.0 m (23 feet) and an eave height of 3.7 m (12 feet). In addition, the assigned plots are not yet developed, so we will need to build a road access here.
On the site plan we were allocated plot number 4.
More details are included in the notes..

Building Plan / Restrictions
  • Plot size: approximately 27.5 m (90 feet) wide × 41 m (135 feet) deep (~1,100 m² (12,000 sq ft))
  • Terrain: flat, no slope
  • Site coverage ratio (floor area ratio): 0.4
  • Floor space index (floor area ratio): 0.4
  • Building envelope / setbacks: 3 m (10 feet) boundary setback, house positioned on the right side, garage may be built on the boundary
  • Number of floors: 1.5 stories (maximum ridge height 7 m (23 feet), eave height approx. 3.7 m (12 feet))
  • Roof type: gable roof, minimum 25° pitch
  • Architectural style: modern country house style
  • Orientation: south is at the top of the plan
  • Maximum heights: 7 m (23 feet) ridge, 3.7 m (12 feet) eave
  • Additional requirements: the plot must be accessed via a new road. The style must blend with the neighborhood.

Homeowner Requirements
  • Building type: single-family home, 1.5 stories, no basement
  • Occupants: 2 adults, later 2 children
  • Ground floor needs: parents’ area fully on the ground floor (bedroom, dressing room, bathroom), living/dining/kitchen area (living area preferably separate), utility room with access to the garage, guest toilet
  • Upper floor needs: 2 children’s bedrooms, 1 office, 1 bathroom, storage room
  • Office: for home office and flexible use
  • Guest accommodation: rare (max. 2–3 times per year)
  • Architecture: open, welcoming, with clear sightlines
  • Construction method: rather conservative-modern (no flat roof, but light materials, clean lines)
  • Kitchen: open kitchen with island
  • Dining area: spacious, table for 6–8 people
  • Fireplace: optional, mainly for design/coziness, probably no
  • Music/stereo: no specific plans yet
  • Balcony/roof terrace: no
  • Garage/carport: double garage, direct access to utility room, cars might be parked under a covered entrance to keep the garage space free since there will be no attic
  • Garden: usable garden area, south-facing terrace → I would like to plan a conservatory here for the future or optionally build it right away. Since we will have a south-facing garden with farmland behind, a conservatory is desired as a separated area to be used all year round.
  • Special features:
    • Smart home planned
    • Parents’ area deliberately on the ground floor
    • Conservatory desired either in the future or built-in from the start


House Design
  • Designed by: architect
  • What we particularly like:
    • South orientation with bright rooms
    • Functional floor plan and parents’ area
  • What we don’t like (yet):
    • Children’s bathroom upstairs might be too large
    • Bedroom too small
    • Pantry/storage room has a door to the utility room; maybe reduce utility room size to enlarge pantry
    • Children’s bedroom closets block windows and might reduce lighting
    • Driveway to garage is not ideal. The garage may need to be moved further back


  • Price estimate from architect: not available yet
  • Personal price limit (house + fittings): around 500,000 € (approximately), completely self-built, land already purchased
  • Heating system: ground source heat pump with borehole, underfloor heating, technical room probably in the garage equipment room

Why the design looks like this

We wanted a home that is family-friendly, functional, and suitable for aging in place, while complying with the building plan.
The basic idea: parents live fully on the ground floor, children live upstairs.

We are still optimizing and would appreciate feedback on:
  • Room layout on the ground floor (hallway, sleeping area)
  • Living/dining/kitchen area: solution with an adjacent conservatory. Living area preferably separate, so children or adults can use different paths when guests visit.
  • Garage size
  • Children’s bathroom: size and whether the storage room could be bigger and the bathroom smaller. Possibly separate the toilet from the children’s bathroom?

We look forward to your honest feedback!
What would you improve or arrange differently?
Thank you very much in advance for your time and suggestions.
Attic floor plan of a house with office, two children’s bedrooms, corridor and bathroom

Two 3D renderings of a modern brick house with garage and garden.

Modern brick house 3D render with extension, flat roof and garden area

3D rendering of a modern brick house with garage and flat roof extension

Site plan of a plot with parcels, paths and building areas

Site plan of a building plot with blue floor plan lines and dimension markings
Y
ypg
15 Oct 2025 20:11
Steiger schrieb:

I have spoken with many people who would not want to miss their conservatory.

Because their house lacks something they are looking for.
In our case, the older generation still has their conservatories, which were considered mainstream and highly desirable in the 1980s. In the end, furniture that is usually kept in the basement for parties is placed there, and garden cushions are stored.
Steiger schrieb:

What I would expect from it is a bright room to spend time in all year round, with views of the garden or the distance.

Plan the rooms to be bright and airy, then you will enjoy spending time there.
wiltshire schrieb:

A dressing room should offer enough space to dress comfortably. The space between the wardrobes is far too narrow for that.

With a width of 250cm (100 inches), it is wide enough to move around on one leg and then to bend down and remove pants with wide movements between two wardrobes facing each other.
Papierturm schrieb:

PS: I am sleep-deprived and only partially coherent.

Lack of sleep does not affect your perception: I also do not like the orientation and natural lighting of the hallway, open-plan area, and living room.
W
wiltshire
16 Oct 2025 00:04
ypg schrieb:

With a width of 250cm (98 inches), it’s wide enough to hop around on one leg, then bend down and pull down your pants in front of two wardrobes facing each other.

A vivid image, and I would agree with you if there were no wardrobes inside. With a depth of 50cm (20 inches), you still have 1.5m (5 feet) left. If you open a wardrobe door, you have 1m (39 inches) of space at that spot, and if a drawer or another door is opened on the opposite side, you’re down to 50cm (20 inches). And if you want to see yourself fully in the mirror, you don’t have the distance for it, because the long side where that would be possible is occupied by windows and a door.
We use the wardrobe as a room divider between the head of the bed and the entrance to the bathroom. There is about 1.5m (5 feet) of space in front of it. That works well for taking things out or putting them away, but I wouldn’t plan it as a dressing area.

Today, we laugh at the tiny kitchens in houses from the 1960s to 1980s that are now considered nonfunctional. The same will happen in a few years with the much too small walk-in closets and pantries. These rooms are a luxury and take up extra square meters. In a tightly designed house, I would question the priority of these spaces, because they take up too much room but don’t sufficiently fulfill their function.
Y
ypg
16 Oct 2025 00:22
wiltshire schrieb:

A wonderful picture, and I would agree with you if no cabinets were installed. With a depth of 50cm (20 inches), 1.50m (5 feet) remain.

Actually... I've been doing this for a long time. Sorry. In rooms like these, first of all, you don't plan for double doors, and secondly, 1.20m (4 feet) fits very well with 60cm (24 inches) deep cabinets. Many plan for 1.80m (6 feet)... and I get some criticism for that too. But criticism has its limits.
wiltshire schrieb:

When you open a cabinet door,

-
wiltshire schrieb:

These rooms are a luxury and require extra square meters. In a house with limited space

Fortunately, space is not tight here 🙂
H
hanghaus2023
16 Oct 2025 09:57
@11ant You can definitely get help with that. Now the north direction is clear as well. I have already marked the plot.

Floor plan of a construction project with two adjacent rooms on a building plot in the background
H
hanghaus2023
16 Oct 2025 10:30
The porch roof and the garage wall exceed the common 9m (30 feet) boundary setback.

Has the eaves height limit been reached?

Is there a cross-section drawing of the house?
S
Steiger
16 Oct 2025 18:17
hanghaus2023 schrieb:

The garage’s canopy and wall exceed the standard 9m (30 feet) boundary setback.

Has the eaves height limit been reached?

Is there a cross-section drawing of the house?

We would get a signature from the neighbor confirming that the boundary setback is acceptable.
Regarding the eaves height and the house’s cross-section, I would need to check with the architect.