ᐅ Planning: Demolish an 80 m² old building and construct a wooden house on the site
Created on: 18 Jun 2024 09:30
B
BauLaie007B
BauLaie00718 Jun 2024 09:30Hello dear community,
I have tried to read through the posts here and was able to understand quite a bit. Now I want to share my planning with you to possibly correct any misjudgments or mistakes on my part.
I am a 33-year-old married man with two children, currently renting in Baden-Württemberg. My parents own a plot of land in a small village in Rhineland-Palatinate. Now I am considering building a small wooden house there using a prefab wooden house manufacturer. Currently, there is an old building on the plot, parcel 37A. At first, the idea was to renovate it and make it habitable again. When I called the craftsmen, each of them said it wasn’t worth it; even the energy consultant advised against it. Since I am not a professional in this field, I took their assessments seriously and am now thinking about demolishing the old building and constructing a wooden house instead. The old building previously had a water supply and still has an electricity connection. The water supply was cut off by my father due to the risk of water damage.
The old building measures 6.50 meters (21 feet) in width and 9.50 meters (31 feet) in length.
The plan is for a prefab wooden house with a smaller footprint to simplify the building permit / planning permission process or to avoid complications with larger structures.
I am open to any criticism or questions.
I have also included a rough cost estimate.
If I have forgotten any cost items or if any cost items seem unrealistically priced, I would appreciate your experience-based feedback.
Many thanks,
Your layman
BauLaie007

I have tried to read through the posts here and was able to understand quite a bit. Now I want to share my planning with you to possibly correct any misjudgments or mistakes on my part.
I am a 33-year-old married man with two children, currently renting in Baden-Württemberg. My parents own a plot of land in a small village in Rhineland-Palatinate. Now I am considering building a small wooden house there using a prefab wooden house manufacturer. Currently, there is an old building on the plot, parcel 37A. At first, the idea was to renovate it and make it habitable again. When I called the craftsmen, each of them said it wasn’t worth it; even the energy consultant advised against it. Since I am not a professional in this field, I took their assessments seriously and am now thinking about demolishing the old building and constructing a wooden house instead. The old building previously had a water supply and still has an electricity connection. The water supply was cut off by my father due to the risk of water damage.
The old building measures 6.50 meters (21 feet) in width and 9.50 meters (31 feet) in length.
The plan is for a prefab wooden house with a smaller footprint to simplify the building permit / planning permission process or to avoid complications with larger structures.
I am open to any criticism or questions.
I have also included a rough cost estimate.
If I have forgotten any cost items or if any cost items seem unrealistically priced, I would appreciate your experience-based feedback.
Many thanks,
Your layman
BauLaie007
So, if you follow the link, you’ll find different figures. The building specifications, uhmm. Don’t need a roof? Heating, tiles, building permit / planning permission (which is probably included in the additional construction costs)? It’s just a pile of materials delivered to you, so it’s an entirely different type of warranty.
Payment terms: no guarantee is a no-go.
Conclusion: add a bit more money, and have a local timber builder do the job—you know exactly what you’re getting, with warranty and guarantee.
Payment terms: no guarantee is a no-go.
Conclusion: add a bit more money, and have a local timber builder do the job—you know exactly what you’re getting, with warranty and guarantee.
Basically, none of the important details have been mentioned:
What kind of development area is this? Is there a zoning plan? What is allowed to be built? Does Paragraph 34 of the Building Code apply?
Then all the technical aspects are missing: there is no utility room, no power supply, just the bare wooden structure. Foundations are also missing. This requires earthworks.
And who is financing it? Is there a bank that would finance such a project? How liquid are you?
Demolition and disposal also have costs.
What kind of development area is this? Is there a zoning plan? What is allowed to be built? Does Paragraph 34 of the Building Code apply?
Then all the technical aspects are missing: there is no utility room, no power supply, just the bare wooden structure. Foundations are also missing. This requires earthworks.
And who is financing it? Is there a bank that would finance such a project? How liquid are you?
Demolition and disposal also have costs.
B
BauLaie00718 Jun 2024 10:28Rübe1 schrieb:
So, if you follow the link, there are different figures. The building description, um. Don’t need a roof? Heating, tiles, building permit / planning permission (should probably be included in additional construction costs)? It’s just a pile of materials delivered, so a completely different kind of warranty.
Payment terms: without a guarantee, a no-go.
Conclusion: spend a bit more money, then have a local timber builder do it and you know what you get. With warranty and guarantee. Thanks first of all for your opinion.
1. The roof is included in the building kit. You are right, I forgot heating. I have a cost item for the bathroom which includes the tiles.
2. Yes, exactly. Material and then self-assembly, or I also have a cost item of 22,000 Euro (about 24,200 USD) for installation in my cost overview.
3. I called several customers who built a similar house with Pineca and they all made such a payment, so I believe it should not be a problem. But thanks for your opinion anyway; I will take it into account.
4. I will try to find a timber builder who can do this in my region.
Thank you for your opinion and your time.
B
BauLaie00718 Jun 2024 10:38ypg schrieb:
Basically, nothing important has been mentioned:
What kind of development area is this? Is there a zoning plan / development plan? What is allowed to be built? Does Section 34 of the Building Code apply?
Then all the technical details are missing: there is no utility room, no power supply; there is only the bare wooden house. Foundations are missing as well. Earthworks will be required for that.
And who is financing this? Is there a bank that would finance such a project? How liquid are you?
Demolition and disposal also cost money. Thank you very much for your opinion and criticism.
1. It is an old development area.
2. There is a zoning plan / development plan.
3. I am currently in the planning phase and do not yet know what I am allowed to build. I just wanted to share my planning ideas.
4. There is no utility room. The costs for the power supply are included in the cost overview and would be addressed later on.
5. When I inquired at my local bank, they said I could get financing up to 200,000.
6. Or do you mean that no bank would finance a wooden house?
7. Demolition and disposal will be done privately; I have also included these costs in the cost overview.
Thanks again for your opinion.
N
nordanney18 Jun 2024 12:27In short, you receive a shell package for a house to be finished by yourself. Everything else still needs to be done, from the necessary connections, wiring, and systems (electricity, water, heating, ventilation), the prior building permit / planning permission, the interior finishing (floors, walls, bathrooms), to the required construction of the foundation or slab.
In conclusion: the house will end up costing about the same as any other house. I’m not trying to speak badly of these houses. However, as a bank, we would not grant you a loan for this house, as it would rather be classified as a holiday home.
In conclusion: the house will end up costing about the same as any other house. I’m not trying to speak badly of these houses. However, as a bank, we would not grant you a loan for this house, as it would rather be classified as a holiday home.