ᐅ Affordable Building Without Compromising Quality, Architect-Designed Home
Created on: 2 Jan 2024 12:33
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIII
Hello everyone!
I have been quietly following this forum for some time, and our house-building project (single-family home) will probably start in Q1/Q2.
I am wondering how to build a house in 2024 cost-effectively without compromising quality.
We have a budget of about 500,000-600,000 euros for the entire construction (excluding the land).
That is a lot of money, but not unlimited – I want to get the best out of it.
A brief overview of our project:
~120m2 (two floors), steep slope, no basement (not possible), 2 adults (maybe one child max in the future), undeveloped plot.
I assume that land development, slope work, and foundation slab will cost around 100,000 euros.
That leaves around 400,000 euros for a move-in ready house.
We have already looked at prefab house providers, but none of their offers matched what we wanted – customizing prefab houses is about as expensive as working directly with an architect.
The plan is to have the house built "ready for finishing" (shell and core) and carry out most of the interior work ourselves (walls, floors, tiles, bathrooms—only the tiling!—and outdoor terraces). We have sufficient craftsmanship skills for this!
Where is the best place to save costs?
What features are often installed without real benefit? (e.g., laundry chute, central vacuum system, automatic blinds, etc.)
Where should you definitely not save?
Should an independent expert inspect the work? Or is that a waste of money for a general contractor/architect-led build?
Should the construction contract be reviewed by a lawyer?
My current thoughts are:
* Simple building shape (rectangle), straightforward pitched roof construction
* No unnecessary home technology (ventilation system, smart home, etc.)
* Minimize large window areas
* Only a carport, no double garage
* The building method (timber frame, solid wood construction like Holz100, masonry) is still open – I prefer timber frame/solid wood.
* Good planning once is cheaper than planning two or three times
* Double checking is cheaper than fixing poorly done work afterwards
* A wood stove is nice, but a fireplace is also expensive.
Where else can you save? What unnecessarily drives construction costs up?
Our idea is:
If we skip things like a double garage, we have more budget for high-quality interior finishes.
We prefer to invest in interior finishing rather than, for example, a laundry chute, central vacuum system, automatic blinds, and so on.
I understand that features like a laundry chute can be subjective when it comes to being "unnecessary" or not.
The goal is to figure out what is essential for a house build, where one should definitely not save, and which elements can be omitted.
There are also significant price ranges for stairs, windows, doors, facades, and roof coverings.
Does it have to be an expensive branded roof? Will a cheaper option suffice?
With this "pre-planning," I also want to minimize the cost of architectural planning. If we come to the architect with a realistic, well-thought-out plan, it probably saves a few thousand euros... Also, an independent building surveyor can save money by detecting issues early on – once the progress payment is made, it is hard to get the money back.
Thanks in advance for your tips and opinions.
I have been quietly following this forum for some time, and our house-building project (single-family home) will probably start in Q1/Q2.
I am wondering how to build a house in 2024 cost-effectively without compromising quality.
We have a budget of about 500,000-600,000 euros for the entire construction (excluding the land).
That is a lot of money, but not unlimited – I want to get the best out of it.
A brief overview of our project:
~120m2 (two floors), steep slope, no basement (not possible), 2 adults (maybe one child max in the future), undeveloped plot.
I assume that land development, slope work, and foundation slab will cost around 100,000 euros.
That leaves around 400,000 euros for a move-in ready house.
We have already looked at prefab house providers, but none of their offers matched what we wanted – customizing prefab houses is about as expensive as working directly with an architect.
The plan is to have the house built "ready for finishing" (shell and core) and carry out most of the interior work ourselves (walls, floors, tiles, bathrooms—only the tiling!—and outdoor terraces). We have sufficient craftsmanship skills for this!
Where is the best place to save costs?
What features are often installed without real benefit? (e.g., laundry chute, central vacuum system, automatic blinds, etc.)
Where should you definitely not save?
Should an independent expert inspect the work? Or is that a waste of money for a general contractor/architect-led build?
Should the construction contract be reviewed by a lawyer?
My current thoughts are:
* Simple building shape (rectangle), straightforward pitched roof construction
* No unnecessary home technology (ventilation system, smart home, etc.)
* Minimize large window areas
* Only a carport, no double garage
* The building method (timber frame, solid wood construction like Holz100, masonry) is still open – I prefer timber frame/solid wood.
* Good planning once is cheaper than planning two or three times
* Double checking is cheaper than fixing poorly done work afterwards
* A wood stove is nice, but a fireplace is also expensive.
Where else can you save? What unnecessarily drives construction costs up?
Our idea is:
If we skip things like a double garage, we have more budget for high-quality interior finishes.
We prefer to invest in interior finishing rather than, for example, a laundry chute, central vacuum system, automatic blinds, and so on.
I understand that features like a laundry chute can be subjective when it comes to being "unnecessary" or not.
The goal is to figure out what is essential for a house build, where one should definitely not save, and which elements can be omitted.
There are also significant price ranges for stairs, windows, doors, facades, and roof coverings.
Does it have to be an expensive branded roof? Will a cheaper option suffice?
With this "pre-planning," I also want to minimize the cost of architectural planning. If we come to the architect with a realistic, well-thought-out plan, it probably saves a few thousand euros... Also, an independent building surveyor can save money by detecting issues early on – once the progress payment is made, it is hard to get the money back.
Thanks in advance for your tips and opinions.
I
IIIIIIIIIIIIII3 Jan 2024 10:47xMisterDx schrieb:
What you have in mind won’t work within your budget. And even if it did, are you aware of what your steep slope means for the landscaping? Unless you’re an expert with an excavator, you’re looking at an additional 100,000 EUR to properly set everything up.How much budget do you think is needed for a house like this? We’re already talking about nearly 200,000 EUR in extra costs compared to an affordable, turnkey prefabricated house.
Here is a picture of the slope.
The house is supposed to be built where the hut stands now. Next to the hut, a hole was dug for the survey, and after about 1.0–1.2 meters (3.3–4 feet), you reach the rock layer. The goal is for the front edge of the house to not extend much beyond where the hut currently is. A protrusion of 1–2 meters (3–6.5 feet) is acceptable, but it’s rather unlikely that the house will start exactly where the hut ends. It is theoretically possible, but not practical — I won’t go into the detailed reasons, but please just accept this and do not suggest placing the house elsewhere.
The slope behind (right side of the picture) is quite steep, about 4–6 meters (13–20 feet) high; going up is impossible without crawling on all fours. Towards the front, the slope is moderate but the wall beneath the hut is probably 50–80 centimeters (20–31 inches) high (estimated, not measured). The hut itself is, again estimated, 2.5–3 meters (8–10 feet) wide.
I removed the sky and the view from the picture to maintain a minimum level of privacy online. We have to live with that until the site plan for the property is completed.
HilfeHilfe schrieb:
Affordable Construction Without Compromising Quality, Architect-Designed House
Sorry, but there are two contradictions in there.No, that’s nonsense. "Affordable without compromising quality" is not a contradiction, but a challenge; and affordable with an architect is even possible (assuming an architect approved by "@Gerddieter").IIIIIIIIIIIIII schrieb:
Here is a picture of the slope.It couldn’t be more frustrating: first no illustration at all, then an example with the note that it does not represent the situation to be illustrated, and now a picture where almost all perspective information has been pixelated out. If someone clearly doesn’t want advice, then I’m off, of course. Those who bite helping hands have to manage without me.https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
H
hanghaus20233 Jan 2024 12:03Show us the plot of land (site plan with street, cardinal directions, and slope information). Is there no geoportal available?
Is this building land? Residential unit house 2. The neighbors’ main residence doesn’t sound like it.
What you have shown here is the ground floor and basement. Will this work with rock just 1 meter (3 feet) deep???
Is this building land? Residential unit house 2. The neighbors’ main residence doesn’t sound like it.
What you have shown here is the ground floor and basement. Will this work with rock just 1 meter (3 feet) deep???
H
hanghaus20233 Jan 2024 12:09The Bayernatlas provides so much information. I am happy to wait for it.
IIIIIIIIIIIIII schrieb:
since I want to maintain a minimum level of privacy on the internetUnfortunately, helpful answers usually require as much information as possible. Of course, you are free to share less, but then you will receive less or no feedback. Don’t worry, no one will show up at your door in three years to check if you really installed the toilet according to the plan.H
hanghaus20233 Jan 2024 12:13IIIIIIIIIIIIII schrieb:
I removed the sky and the view from the picture because I want to maintain a minimum level of privacy on the internet. This has to do until the site plan of the property is completed.Is the property not yet listed in the Bayernatlas?Similar topics