ᐅ Unusually high quote for ventilation system

Created on: 10 Dec 2023 09:02
M
mariano.dechow
Our construction supervisor (BU) is very honest, and we, as well as others, trust him a lot.

However, he is not a fan of ventilation systems.

Here are the prices he quoted. Are there

1. Solutions that are more integrated into the wall or similar, to avoid additional height increases, and

2. Is the price reasonable?

Total area is 187 sqm (2013 sq ft), including about 40 sqm (430 sq ft) of an extension. The rest is spread over two levels in a town villa style.
There is a ceiling opening of about 9 sqm (97 sq ft) to the first floor, which is not included in the 187 sqm (2013 sq ft).

Attached is the text from the BU.

Pluggit Avent fresh air unit with heat recovery included.
Aluminum cross counterflow heat exchanger
Including air ducts, supply and exhaust air outlets, silencers, distributor, cover grilles in standard white plastic, supply and install 14,192.58 €

Blower door test mandatory when installing ventilation system 476.00 €

Increase of total floor construction height from 14 cm (5.5 inches) to 18 cm (7 inches) on the upper floor
By adding 3 cm (1.2 inches) more styrofoam insulation 2,988.97 €

Enthalpy exchanger and summer bypass
No costs yet
Y
ypg
18 Dec 2023 00:21
Radfahrer schrieb:

Costs for maintenance, filter replacement, cleaning, and electricity consumption should leave no room for savings.
Radfahrer schrieb:

Ventilation systems can also become breeding grounds for germs.

What you’re spouting off at the pub is quite entertaining.
There’s no maintenance, the breeding ground for germs is probably more your toilet and sink, cleaning isn’t really necessary, and electricity consumption can be ignored—unless you need to plan your monthly budget down to 5€ exactly. And no one talked about “saving money,” but about gaining comfort.
R
Radfahrer
18 Dec 2023 04:20
My usual statements about costs come directly from the consumer advice center! Just Google it!
Malle Zwabber schrieb:

My energy consultant calculated my energy consumption with and without a mechanical ventilation system with heat recovery.
In summary, such a ventilation system usually does not make economic sense. With 144sqm (1550 sq ft) of living space in my case, the annual savings amount to only 430 euros minus 43 euros for the electricity consumption of the ventilation system. So just 387 euros per year.
ypg schrieb:

There is no maintenance.

We’ll talk again in 20 years.
M
MayrCh
18 Dec 2023 10:47
Radfahrer schrieb:

My regular round-table sayings
Where does the idea about contamination come from?
K
KarstenausNRW
18 Dec 2023 11:07
Radfahrer schrieb:

My usual party lines about costs come straight from the consumer advice center! Google helps!

The consumer advice center NRW only states that a controlled ventilation system is recommended. There is no mention of contamination.

But yes, there is a note about costs (see the text). These are very individual, though. You can calculate electricity costs yourself, replace/cut filters yourself (I pay a small single-digit € amount per year for self-purchased filter mats, which I cut myself, including pollen filters as an allergy sufferer). Cleaning is needed only as required – if the controlled ventilation is running regularly, the need may not arise even after 10 years (based on experience).
So these are maximum costs, which can be reduced by up to 95% for maintenance if you are willing. But that kind of information doesn’t get exchanged at the local pub, only criticism.

Textabschnitt über Investitions- und Betriebskosten einer Lüftungsanlage
R
Radfahrer
18 Dec 2023 15:55
I would like to clarify this once again.
I am not against mechanical ventilation systems!
My claim is that, from an economic perspective, mechanical ventilation systems offer me no advantages.
I am not in a position to assess to what extent maintenance costs can be reduced; however, I have serious concerns about having no maintenance at all (statement by ypg).
i_b_n_a_n18 Dec 2023 16:02
Radfahrer schrieb:

I want to clarify this again.
I am not against mechanical ventilation with heat recovery!
My point is that, from an economic perspective, mechanical ventilation with heat recovery does not provide me with any benefits.
I cannot judge to what extent maintenance costs can be reduced; however, I have serious reservations about having no maintenance at all (statement from ypg).

In my opinion, mechanical ventilation with heat recovery is NEVER economical (has anyone claimed otherwise?).
Even if filter costs are only a few euros (cutting them yourself), the electricity consumption is higher than the energy saved. (My central mechanical ventilation system with heat recovery uses about 30–40 watts continuously according to the datasheet, although I haven’t measured it myself.) The energy saved (as indicated by my system, which I converted to euros) was around €35 per year.