ᐅ Floor Plan for a Single-Family Home, 240 m², with Partially Built-Over Garage

Created on: 3 Dec 2023 13:51
H
Haus 42
Hello everyone,

My wife and I are currently favoring the attached design for our house project. It is our own concept, inspired by forum discussions, catalogs, and model homes, but also discussed with architects and now unrecognizable compared to the first drafts.

A first detailed drawing is in progress (which may include structural and building services adjustments), so general criticism is welcome, but especially suggestions on potential problem areas or ways to achieve essential improvements through small changes: After all, we don’t want to build an expensive house only to regret it later, but rather invest in meaningful improvements (e.g., bay windows). At the bottom, I have listed some specific concerns.

Framework conditions:
  • Planned residents: two adults (working days home/office: 2/3 and 3/2), two (initially small) children, two cats, guests staying several weeks per year.
  • Conditions: Small-town new development area in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, site coverage ratio 0.35, maximum one full story, eaves height max. 5m (16 ft 5 in), gable or half-hipped roof with 20°–50° pitch, minimum distance to street 5m (16 ft 5 in), to neighbors 3m (10 ft).
  • Plot: 938 m² (10,094 sq ft), essentially flat, with utility garden and play lawn.
  • Neighboring plots: Northeast (“right”) already developed (close to road and at distance from us, since their garage is on the side facing away from us), southwest (“left”) not yet sold.

Site plan with building footprint, boundary lines and dimensions


Design:
  • Footprint: approx. 15.5m×11m (51 ft × 36 ft) + garage overhang 2m×8m (6 ft 7 in × 26 ft), garage-boundary distance 1m (3 ft 3 in)
  • Living and utility space: ground floor approx. 115 m² (1,238 sq ft), upper floor approx. 125 m² (1,345 sq ft), garage approx. 40 m² (430 sq ft)
  • Ceiling height: ground floor approx. 2.60m (8 ft 6 in), upper floor approx. 2.50m (8 ft 2 in)
  • Building services: ventilation system, photovoltaic panels on southeast roof, underfloor heating powered by air-source heat pump everywhere except garage/attic.
  • Location: the house should be as close to the street as possible (see plan) with the main entrance facing it (southeast), to maximize garden space.
  • Gable roof: rather flat (25°) to allow for a high knee wall (>1.20m (3 ft 11 in)), attic therefore only used for storage.
  • We are foregoing a basement in favor of a larger footprint, which also enables a barrier-free guest area.
  • Ground floor: the living area should get both sunlight and garden views, so it must be on the west side.
  • Upper floor: usability of space is the priority, so we accept the narrow corridor (approx. 1.5m×8m (4 ft 11 in × 26 ft)). Still, generous dormers, including in the stairwell, should provide enough daylight.
  • Exterior walls are brick-clad, interior rather modern: white walls/kitchen fronts, tiled floors on the ground floor, PVC on the upper floor.

Notes on the floor plans:
  • Area measurements do not account for sloping ceilings on the upper floor.
  • ⚡ means high-voltage electricity, W (waste) water

2D floor plan of a house with open kitchen, living room, bedroom, bathroom and garage

Detailed 2D floor plan of a family house with bedrooms, bathroom and corridor.


Development:

We had several designs, including with a basement, without construction over the garage (which was recently confirmed as possible), with open space, guest rooms on different sides, a 180° half-landing staircase, etc. – the current approach now seems quite logical to us and despite the naturally high costs, not extravagant. I grew up in a house with a full basement and converted attic, and the plan tries to provide similar spaces over two floors.
  • What we like: the bright living room, purely functional generous sizing everywhere, especially for guests and thanks to the large room upstairs, the access from the garage.
  • What we don’t like: see also the “Concerns” listed at the bottom. Otherwise, the “very generous” house (architect’s comment) might have few ‘eye-catchers’ for its price, e.g., no gallery or two bathrooms upstairs instead of one large. Therefore, general suggestions are welcome on how to enhance the design beyond the floor plan, for instance through lighting, mirrors, windows, external design.

Ground floor details:
  • Living room with window fronts each with a door leading to terraces in the southwest (for sunlight) and northwest (toward the garden).
  • Kitchen open to the living area; appliances located in a central niche—therefore, to minimize noise, the oven/microwave are there instead of the refrigerator.
  • Room behind kitchen (separated by a slightly hidden door) serves as storage and a place for some kitchen appliances and an additional worktop.
  • From the hallway, a doorless passage to the living room, doors to guest room, guest toilet, and utility room, also from there access to the garage.
  • Large guest room with barrier-free bathroom and external access, potentially a one-room separate apartment.
  • Garage for one car, e-scooter/bicycles and as a workshop/storage room, for example for garden tools.

Upper floor details:
  • Children’s rooms on the sunnier gable side.
  • Children’s bathroom with bathtub, master bathroom with washing machine/dryer (but space in utility room to allow for changes).
  • Long dormers above bathrooms/stairwell and fitness/hobby room; no other roof windows.
  • Access to attic via fitness/hobby room.

Concerns / Questions
  • The (currently half-landing) staircase may need to be spiral to allow doors to fit under its end. Is preserving the half-landing for climbing safety worth a bay window?
  • Prefabricated houses often have bay windows, although they might be energetically disadvantageous. Are they mainly for aesthetics, or have we missed practical opportunities by not including any?
  • Is the staircase too close to the entrance, e.g., regarding dirt distribution?
  • We would like remote/central control for roller shutters on all burglary-relevant windows. Would narrow windows be acceptable in the utility room, guest bathroom, and ground floor toilet, to prevent break-ins? Does anyone have experience with this?
  • With a 25° pitch and 1.20m (3 ft 11 in) knee wall, is an overhanging roof suitable as a cover for the entrance and/or terrace without causing too much shading? What other canopy options would make sense, especially since the terrace is on the exposure-prone side?
  • To prevent bicycles from scratching the car in the garage, should it be widened? This would reduce the remaining strip on the southwest side, where the tightest boundary distance (at the west corner, “top left”) is currently about 5m (16 ft 5 in).
  • Is a TV placed directly next to the window front a problem due to the northwest orientation?
  • Should the pantry behind the kitchen have a second sink?
  • Would it be better to fill the garden-facing dormer entirely with windows rather than leaving corners open as planned?
  • Which windows should be included in the bathroom dormer considering there are houses on the opposite side of the street?

We look forward to your comments!
Y
ypg
8 Dec 2023 23:36
K a t j a schrieb:

Especially since the planning will probably still take months...

That will be the case.
Haus 42 schrieb:

And maybe my secondary accounts are only with utility companies that require opening a new account for a new contract – you’re probably confusing something.

Different building forum… 🙄
11ant schrieb:

Then everything is fine; Yvonne’s “recognition” of your design had me a bit worried that my 11ant-memory was off. Probably someone else, an amateur planner, happened to discuss a lookalike of your design.

…bad memory 😎
The planning I mentioned is from early June. That’s when things were already discussed very openly.
Also, you can read that an architect sees a problem with the basement due to groundwater and the cost of waterproofing on this property. Everyone (experts and forums) warn about the costs and feasibility (wastewater and basement heating).
So, it’s likely that a third forum dealing with basement wastewater will come into play. The professional recommends one approach, but the forum tries to hear the opposite. It’s a classic situation.

Floor plan by Haus 42

Floor plan of a house: living/dining room, kitchen, hallway, bedroom, bathroom, garage with car.

Photos in another forum

3D floor plan of a house with several rooms and yellow car in garage area


Two images: site plan of the plot and ground floor plan with garage.


Next year it will continue in another forum 😉 For now, let’s just relax. Time is not an issue 😉
11ant9 Dec 2023 00:37
ypg schrieb:

…poor memory 😎
The planning I referred to is from early June. That’s when things were already discussed very openly.
[...] Floor plan of house 42

... aka "On the other hand," as the original poster titled their thread "Single-family house with guest area: ‘Floor area instead of basement’.”
11ant schrieb:

First plan conceptually in several stages, before proceeding with drawings, and go to the architect without drawings, but only with requirements and wishes.

I had phrased it that way at the time:
When you go to an architect, bring only your list of requirements, and do not introduce your own initial sketches into the discussion before the professional has developed their own ideas about a possible building form.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
A
aero2016
9 Dec 2023 06:40
ypg schrieb:

Photos in another forum
11ant schrieb:

aka "On the other hand," as the original poster called themselves in "Single-family house with guest area: ‘Footprint instead of basement’.”

That already crosses the line into stalking behavior.
Y
ypg
9 Dec 2023 09:25
Haus 42 schrieb:

if the thieves consider everything as shabby as you do.

No, I’m registered here just like the OP. It’s a public forum, after all. You don’t even need to search for it.

However, I want to make clear that including the username here was unnecessary. It shouldn’t have happened and doesn’t lead to anything positive.
A
aero2016
9 Dec 2023 10:01
ypg schrieb:

There is no need to search for that either.
However, there is also no need to copy posts or pictures from there over to here.
Y
ypg
9 Dec 2023 14:24
aero2016 schrieb:

But there’s no need to copy posts/images from there over to here.

It’s the same design, nothing new, not confidential – no reason for exaggerated reactions.

The original poster is responsible for their own progress – when asked if this has been discussed before, possibly to point out a missing learning curve, and they “don’t know anything about it,” there really isn’t much sign of learning taking place.

If this were the very first design… but they’ve actually been working on it for quite some time.

@Haus 42
Take another look at the thread from June, the forum where many architects participated and responded. Most of the replies were quite substantial!
And now see where you have ended up after half a year…

Similar topics