ᐅ Floor plan for a single-family house, 130 sqm, hillside plot, 2 stories
Created on: 9 Dec 2021 19:09
P
Pitigliano
Attached is the questionnaire with the floor plan and plot details for discussion.
Development Plan / Restrictions
Plot size: 2200 sqm (0.54 acres)
Slope: South-facing slope, about 2.50 m (8 ft) within the building zone
Floor area ratio: §34 – adjacent properties have 1.5 to 2 stories with gable roofs
Plot ratio: §34
Building zone, building line, and boundary
Edge development
Number of parking spaces: 2
Number of floors: 2 full floors
Roof type: 22-degree gable roof
Architectural style
Orientation: South-facing slope, accordingly oriented
Maximum heights / limits
Additional requirements
Client Requirements
Architectural style, roof type, building type: Classic, gable roof, single-family house without projections
Basement, floors: No basement, but due to slope, the lower residential floor should be partially embedded into the hillside. Above that, the ground floor as a full story.
Number of occupants, ages: 2 adults (42 and 49), 1 child (19)
Space requirements on ground and upper floors: approximately 65 sqm (700 sq ft) each
Office: Family use or home office? No
Overnight guests per year: negligible
Open or closed layout: open on the ground floor
Conservative or modern construction:
Open kitchen with island: Yes, with island
Number of dining seats: 6
Fireplace: No
Music / stereo wall
Balcony, roof terrace: No
Garage, carport: Double garage preferred, carport acceptable if necessary
Utility garden, greenhouse
Additional wishes: Photovoltaics planned, mechanical ventilation system included in price, KfW55 energy standard
House Design
Planning source: DIY and general contractor planner
-Planner from construction company: Yes
-Architect: No
-Do-it-yourself: Yes
What do you especially like? Why? South orientation, view
What do you dislike? Why? That’s for you to tell us
Price estimate from architect/planner: 330,000
Personal price limit for house, including fittings: 450,000 including additional construction costs
Preferred heating technology: Air-to-water heat pump
If you have to give up on which details / expansions
-Can you do without: Garage
-Can’t do without: Not building smaller
Why did the design evolve as it is now? Example:
Information from the web (including this forum) and contacts with other builders
What makes it especially good or bad in your view? Don’t know
What is the most important / fundamental question about the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
Because of this forum, the building shell is planned as it currently is. The lower residential floor is to be half embedded into the slope on the valley side. On the open side are the two bedrooms and the main entrance. To the right, the double garage, also partly embedded in the slope. In the slope are the utility room and a bathroom. The ground floor above is planned entirely for living, with terraces and garden access, plus a small bathroom.
Fire away and thank you all.
Plan top is north.
Development Plan / Restrictions
Plot size: 2200 sqm (0.54 acres)
Slope: South-facing slope, about 2.50 m (8 ft) within the building zone
Floor area ratio: §34 – adjacent properties have 1.5 to 2 stories with gable roofs
Plot ratio: §34
Building zone, building line, and boundary
Edge development
Number of parking spaces: 2
Number of floors: 2 full floors
Roof type: 22-degree gable roof
Architectural style
Orientation: South-facing slope, accordingly oriented
Maximum heights / limits
Additional requirements
Client Requirements
Architectural style, roof type, building type: Classic, gable roof, single-family house without projections
Basement, floors: No basement, but due to slope, the lower residential floor should be partially embedded into the hillside. Above that, the ground floor as a full story.
Number of occupants, ages: 2 adults (42 and 49), 1 child (19)
Space requirements on ground and upper floors: approximately 65 sqm (700 sq ft) each
Office: Family use or home office? No
Overnight guests per year: negligible
Open or closed layout: open on the ground floor
Conservative or modern construction:
Open kitchen with island: Yes, with island
Number of dining seats: 6
Fireplace: No
Music / stereo wall
Balcony, roof terrace: No
Garage, carport: Double garage preferred, carport acceptable if necessary
Utility garden, greenhouse
Additional wishes: Photovoltaics planned, mechanical ventilation system included in price, KfW55 energy standard
House Design
Planning source: DIY and general contractor planner
-Planner from construction company: Yes
-Architect: No
-Do-it-yourself: Yes
What do you especially like? Why? South orientation, view
What do you dislike? Why? That’s for you to tell us
Price estimate from architect/planner: 330,000
Personal price limit for house, including fittings: 450,000 including additional construction costs
Preferred heating technology: Air-to-water heat pump
If you have to give up on which details / expansions
-Can you do without: Garage
-Can’t do without: Not building smaller
Why did the design evolve as it is now? Example:
Information from the web (including this forum) and contacts with other builders
What makes it especially good or bad in your view? Don’t know
What is the most important / fundamental question about the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
Because of this forum, the building shell is planned as it currently is. The lower residential floor is to be half embedded into the slope on the valley side. On the open side are the two bedrooms and the main entrance. To the right, the double garage, also partly embedded in the slope. In the slope are the utility room and a bathroom. The ground floor above is planned entirely for living, with terraces and garden access, plus a small bathroom.
Fire away and thank you all.
Plan top is north.
B
Bau-beendet12 Nov 2023 13:27Pitiglianio schrieb:
Hehe, even in the underdeveloped West Palatinate region there are cell towers.
Anyone else have any ideas? Take a look at starlink dot com, no contract period, maybe an alternative to a fixed wireless home internet connection?!
P
Pitiglianio12 Nov 2023 21:54Pitiglianio schrieb:
For now, I am forced to order a mobile home spot,11ant schrieb:
You mentioned a mobile hotspotDear@11ant
I spoke and am still speaking about a mobile home spot, not a hotspot.
This is the option to get mobile internet for the home via LTE, as an alternative to DSL/fiber optics, which is currently not available for us.
Nothing like an outside broadcast van or anything similar.
Mog-Pharau schrieb:
Unfortunately, I can’t contribute, but I would still like to ask a question: Who did you build with in the West Palatinate region?With RKR SystembauP
Pitiglianio12 Nov 2023 21:55Bau-beendet schrieb:
Take a look at starlink dot com, no contract period, maybe as an alternative to Homespot?! I have already checked it out, I find it interesting too, but it is still too expensive.
mr.xyz1 schrieb:
Magenta T offers an LTE router “parallel” to fixed-line service, as long as the fixed-line is not active. It doesn’t cost more than the fixed-line. I don’t quite understand what you mean?
Pitiglianio schrieb:
Dear @11ant I have been and continue to talk about a mobile home spot, not a hotspot. This refers to the option of ordering mobile internet for home use via LTE, as an alternative to DSL or fiber optic internet, which is currently not available to us. Not a broadcast vehicle or anything like that. Haha, my vacation readiness shows. It was a busy week, but at least we had dry weather for hiking today.https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Similar topics