ᐅ Floor plan for a single-family house, 130 sqm, hillside plot, 2 stories
Created on: 9 Dec 2021 19:09
P
Pitigliano
Attached is the questionnaire with the floor plan and plot details for discussion.
Development Plan / Restrictions
Plot size: 2200 sqm (0.54 acres)
Slope: South-facing slope, about 2.50 m (8 ft) within the building zone
Floor area ratio: §34 – adjacent properties have 1.5 to 2 stories with gable roofs
Plot ratio: §34
Building zone, building line, and boundary
Edge development
Number of parking spaces: 2
Number of floors: 2 full floors
Roof type: 22-degree gable roof
Architectural style
Orientation: South-facing slope, accordingly oriented
Maximum heights / limits
Additional requirements
Client Requirements
Architectural style, roof type, building type: Classic, gable roof, single-family house without projections
Basement, floors: No basement, but due to slope, the lower residential floor should be partially embedded into the hillside. Above that, the ground floor as a full story.
Number of occupants, ages: 2 adults (42 and 49), 1 child (19)
Space requirements on ground and upper floors: approximately 65 sqm (700 sq ft) each
Office: Family use or home office? No
Overnight guests per year: negligible
Open or closed layout: open on the ground floor
Conservative or modern construction:
Open kitchen with island: Yes, with island
Number of dining seats: 6
Fireplace: No
Music / stereo wall
Balcony, roof terrace: No
Garage, carport: Double garage preferred, carport acceptable if necessary
Utility garden, greenhouse
Additional wishes: Photovoltaics planned, mechanical ventilation system included in price, KfW55 energy standard
House Design
Planning source: DIY and general contractor planner
-Planner from construction company: Yes
-Architect: No
-Do-it-yourself: Yes
What do you especially like? Why? South orientation, view
What do you dislike? Why? That’s for you to tell us
Price estimate from architect/planner: 330,000
Personal price limit for house, including fittings: 450,000 including additional construction costs
Preferred heating technology: Air-to-water heat pump
If you have to give up on which details / expansions
-Can you do without: Garage
-Can’t do without: Not building smaller
Why did the design evolve as it is now? Example:
Information from the web (including this forum) and contacts with other builders
What makes it especially good or bad in your view? Don’t know
What is the most important / fundamental question about the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
Because of this forum, the building shell is planned as it currently is. The lower residential floor is to be half embedded into the slope on the valley side. On the open side are the two bedrooms and the main entrance. To the right, the double garage, also partly embedded in the slope. In the slope are the utility room and a bathroom. The ground floor above is planned entirely for living, with terraces and garden access, plus a small bathroom.
Fire away and thank you all.
Plan top is north.
Development Plan / Restrictions
Plot size: 2200 sqm (0.54 acres)
Slope: South-facing slope, about 2.50 m (8 ft) within the building zone
Floor area ratio: §34 – adjacent properties have 1.5 to 2 stories with gable roofs
Plot ratio: §34
Building zone, building line, and boundary
Edge development
Number of parking spaces: 2
Number of floors: 2 full floors
Roof type: 22-degree gable roof
Architectural style
Orientation: South-facing slope, accordingly oriented
Maximum heights / limits
Additional requirements
Client Requirements
Architectural style, roof type, building type: Classic, gable roof, single-family house without projections
Basement, floors: No basement, but due to slope, the lower residential floor should be partially embedded into the hillside. Above that, the ground floor as a full story.
Number of occupants, ages: 2 adults (42 and 49), 1 child (19)
Space requirements on ground and upper floors: approximately 65 sqm (700 sq ft) each
Office: Family use or home office? No
Overnight guests per year: negligible
Open or closed layout: open on the ground floor
Conservative or modern construction:
Open kitchen with island: Yes, with island
Number of dining seats: 6
Fireplace: No
Music / stereo wall
Balcony, roof terrace: No
Garage, carport: Double garage preferred, carport acceptable if necessary
Utility garden, greenhouse
Additional wishes: Photovoltaics planned, mechanical ventilation system included in price, KfW55 energy standard
House Design
Planning source: DIY and general contractor planner
-Planner from construction company: Yes
-Architect: No
-Do-it-yourself: Yes
What do you especially like? Why? South orientation, view
What do you dislike? Why? That’s for you to tell us
Price estimate from architect/planner: 330,000
Personal price limit for house, including fittings: 450,000 including additional construction costs
Preferred heating technology: Air-to-water heat pump
If you have to give up on which details / expansions
-Can you do without: Garage
-Can’t do without: Not building smaller
Why did the design evolve as it is now? Example:
Information from the web (including this forum) and contacts with other builders
What makes it especially good or bad in your view? Don’t know
What is the most important / fundamental question about the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
Because of this forum, the building shell is planned as it currently is. The lower residential floor is to be half embedded into the slope on the valley side. On the open side are the two bedrooms and the main entrance. To the right, the double garage, also partly embedded in the slope. In the slope are the utility room and a bathroom. The ground floor above is planned entirely for living, with terraces and garden access, plus a small bathroom.
Fire away and thank you all.
Plan top is north.
P
Pitiglianio10 Nov 2023 19:46I am currently having issues with our telecommunication house connection.
Fiber optic cable has been installed to the house, but the provider is not making progress with further expansion in the area, and it is currently uncertain when the cable will be activated.
I had already commissioned the telecom company in February this year to additionally and as a precaution lay a copper cable to the house.
However, despite several inquiries, the telecom company has shown little effort to break up the street and install the cable.
For now, I am forced to order a mobile home hotspot, mainly because I work from home and absolutely need an internet connection.
Mobile hotspots are significantly more expensive than comparable DSL providers, but we have no other option.
My question is:
Has anyone else experienced similar problems or had this issue in the past? Is there not an obligation for telecommunication providers to supply service?
Or is a mobile data connection sufficient to avoid this obligation?
Fiber optic cable has been installed to the house, but the provider is not making progress with further expansion in the area, and it is currently uncertain when the cable will be activated.
I had already commissioned the telecom company in February this year to additionally and as a precaution lay a copper cable to the house.
However, despite several inquiries, the telecom company has shown little effort to break up the street and install the cable.
For now, I am forced to order a mobile home hotspot, mainly because I work from home and absolutely need an internet connection.
Mobile hotspots are significantly more expensive than comparable DSL providers, but we have no other option.
My question is:
Has anyone else experienced similar problems or had this issue in the past? Is there not an obligation for telecommunication providers to supply service?
Or is a mobile data connection sufficient to avoid this obligation?
Pitiglianio schrieb:
I am currently forced to order a mobile home spot, mainly because I work from home and absolutely need an internet connection.
Mobile home spots are significantly more expensive than comparable DSL providers, but we have no other choice.Does that mean a broadcast van (today, of course, more like a car trailer) will be parked on your street because your house can’t be connected via terrestrial means at the moment?https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
P
Pitiglianio12 Nov 2023 07:46Hehe, there are also cell towers in the underdeveloped Westpfalz region.
Does anyone else have any ideas?
Does anyone else have any ideas?
M
Mog-Pharau12 Nov 2023 11:18Unfortunately, I can't contribute anything, but I would still like to ask a question: Who did you build with in the Westpfalz region?
Pitiglianio schrieb:
Hehe, even the underdeveloped Westpfalz has cell towers. You mentioned a mobile hotspot. If Westpfalz has mobile cell towers, it must be quite well developed. What I meant (and what I imagine by the term mobile hotspot) are, as I said, mini broadcast vehicles—basically access points of terrestrial cell towers housed in a kind of catering trailer that can be parked at the roadside.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Similar topics