ᐅ Floor plan, post-and-beam construction, accessory dwelling unit, and existing building

Created on: 21 Feb 2023 20:48
B
BucheOnBoard
Hello everyone,
Currently, my father, my wife, and my child (under 1 year old) live in a small residential house from the 1950s with 61m² (655 sq ft) of living space. The property is owned 50/50 by my father and me but is still partly being paid off by my grandmother (my outstanding payments are held in a separate account and are therefore just a “pass-through” item, while my father pays his monthly installments from his income). The plot is in Hamburg Iserbrook and measures 681m² (7,333 sq ft) with a standard land value of €985.
Unsurprisingly, the space is becoming somewhat tight, even though we get along well. Furthermore, the health of the older housemate is declining, and the narrow staircase to the upper floor is already becoming difficult to manage.
The basic idea is this: I would receive the second half of the plot as a gift, debt-free. My father will continue paying off his installments until he inherits the remainder. In return, we will build him a nice accessory apartment with the corresponding right of residence (or usufruct right, which still needs to be clarified)—barrier-free and compact so he can live independently there for as long as possible. The rest of the ground floor would then only contain a multipurpose room, guest toilet, and hallway; upstairs four rooms and a bathroom. We would like a (simple) converted attic as a retreat area. To relieve the ground floor space and avoid fully using the building envelope (sealing of surfaces, etc.), we plan a basement, as there are also two space-intensive hobbies and a workshop desired for DIY projects. I will also build some of the furniture myself.

Now to the questionnaire:

Building Plan / Restrictions
Plot size: 681m² (7,333 sq ft) with existing house
Slope: No, but the area from the street level up to the terrace is filled +90cm (35 inches), the garage is at about +40cm (16 inches), the neighboring plot to the north also about +40cm (16 inches), and to the south approximately at street level
Floor area ratio (FAR): 0.4
Plot ratio (building coverage ratio): 0.4
Building envelope, building line, and boundaries: 5m (16.4 ft) setback to the street, then 15m (49.2 ft) deep, 2.5m (8.2 ft) setback on each side (more for taller buildings)
Edge development: Allowed (garages etc., max. wall height 3m (10 ft), max. length 9m (30 ft))
Number of parking spaces: We believe none are legally required; we plan to provide one for future use, for electric vehicle charging (currently not needed)
Number of floors: One full story; ALKIS shows some buildings apparently with two floors (see attachment)
Roof type: Not specified
Architectural style: Not specified
Orientation: Not specified
Maximum heights/limits: Not specified
Other requirements: No illuminated advertising signs 😉
The 1965 building plan mainly mandates “residential zoning only” and “one full story,” but even these rules seem flexible. There is a very large copper beech tree in the southeast corner of the plot, with an estimated crown diameter of 10m (33 ft) and at least 12-14m (39-46 ft) tall. The tree is to be preserved (it is unclear if it must officially be preserved with a new build). I expect that the new building must not come closer to the tree than the current building—about 2.5m (8.2 ft) from the trunk. The trunk itself is roughly 1.5m (5 ft) in diameter. A pruning plan is under discussion (also due to shading of the roof, planned for solar panels).

Owners' Requirements
Architectural style, roof shape, building type: Detached single-family home, gable roof with pitch >45°, rather long and narrow
Basement, number of floors: Yes to basement, 1.5 floors plus a converted attic
Number of occupants, ages: 4 (64 (gruff and private), 34, 31, under 1) Another child should be possible
Ground floor space needs: Open-plan area preferably with a small pantry, guest toilet
Accessory apartment with barrier-free design (walk-in shower, open living kitchen with sleeping niche). Can be small.
Shared hallway important (for potential care needs without going outside, access to joint basement with laundry facilities, etc.)
Upper floor space needs: 1 bedroom with a large bed and built-in closets but no extras, 3 rooms (1 child’s room, 1 office/child’s room, 1 guest/office (can be small)), 1 bathroom with a larger vanity, bathtub, and shower
Attic space needs: 2 “retreat” areas for the adults; if necessary, just a rocking chair with reading lamp and sewing machine on one side, and a gaming PC on the other. The current attic is an equilateral triangle with 2.1m (83 inches) side length; it doesn’t need to be much larger/wider/higher than that.
Basement space needs (access via shared hallway + additional exterior entrance): Technical room with heat pump, ventilation, electrical distribution, inverter, server; woodwork workshop; laundry room; 2 hobby cellars for large-format collections—Lego and beer cans, no kink-shaming please 😉 ; 1 storage room for decorations, suitcases, camping gear, etc. Must be heated (and ventilated), but simple tile flooring and surface-mounted installations are sufficient.
Office: Family use or home office? Home office about three times a week, plus one self-employed side business
Guest stays per year: 6–10, usually just one night, sometimes 2–3 nights
Open or closed design: Open on the ground floor but staircase not located in the living room/open space
Conservative or modern construction? I’m never quite sure of the difference, but I feel fully modern
Open kitchen, kitchen island: Yes, cooking often and joyfully, also with guests
Number of dining seats: 6; existing table extends to 14 seats for Christmas and birthdays
Fireplace: No, no chimney planned
Music/stereo wall: No
Balcony, roof terrace: No
Garage, carport: Carport/roof overhang directly at the building would be good, mainly for bikes and potentially for an electric vehicle in the (near) future. To my knowledge, Hamburg does not require parking spaces.
Vegetable garden, greenhouse: Maybe a small bed later, but not important at the moment
Other wishes/particularities/daily routine, including reasons for certain choices: Currently, leisure activities happen at the dining table, which is between sofa and TV (used about once a week), so large lounge furniture is not really needed. The tree is a critical factor, as it likely narrows the building envelope in the front area to about 6.5m (21 ft). We don’t want to move the house further back because of the garden.

House Design
Planner: Still in the very early idea phase. Overall, we think about 180m² (1,937 sq ft) of living space plus basement. We currently live as four on 61m² (655 sq ft) and can manage. We don’t need huge increases in room size, rather a spatial separation with the accessory apartment and space for hobbies and home office. Dressing rooms or a children’s bathroom are not planned.
Personal budget limit for house including fittings: €750,000–800,000 (USD amount varies), with much furniture available from the existing house. Demolition cost would be extra, but I see plenty of grants and rental expenses during construction period. €450,000 (about $480,000) equity is available; the plot described above would be fully paid off (worth almost €700,000 or approximately $750,000).
Preferred heating technology: Ground-source heat pump with deep borehole and 12–15kWp photovoltaic system plus centralized controlled residential ventilation with enthalpy heat exchanger

If you have to compromise, on which features/extensions
- What can you do without: Either attic conversion or guest-office room
- What you cannot do without: Basement

Why is the design like this? No design yet; we are still considering the orientation on the plot.
It will be a timber frame construction, a gable roof to fit well, knee wall about 1.3m (4.3 ft), roof pitch >45°. The current roof is 60° and gives it a rustic fairy-tale look. On the south side, we want nearly full photovoltaic coverage except for a few roof windows; on the north side, we can imagine a dormer also to integrate the staircase to the attic—maybe a cross-gable?
The rough idea is close to the volume of a Danwood Point 138.1, but a bit wider and longer, and “narrower at the front” (the east side facing the street) due to the tree. Plus an attic conversion with a steeper roof. Access via staircase on the north side.

Alternatively, separate accessory apartment in the south and main residence in the north, but that would split the already narrow house into even narrower parts.

We would like a local timber frame general contractor (any recommendations in the greater Hamburg area?).

Am I completely off track? Have I forgotten anything? Made any major mistakes besides not building three years ago? Are important details missing? Will it all turn out too cramped? Is the budget roughly realistic? Aside from a garden shed, I have no building experience but some electrical knowledge. Photovoltaics and networking could be done by me, full electrical installation I am allowed but would not be practical with a general contractor.

Or is the program so complex that an architect is absolutely necessary because a draftsman would be overwhelmed? From my research it seems that architects for single-family homes that are not villas are quite rare.

Thanks to everyone who made it this far! And even more thanks to those who share their opinions or ideas.

Attached are current ALKIS excerpt, aerial photo, and building plan excerpt, all oriented north and approximately the same section. I hope they are legible… Red borders and points mark the plot.
Y
ypg
20 Oct 2023 12:57
BucheOnBoard schrieb:

As far as I know, I never mentioned 60° anywhere,
That’s correct, at least I can’t find it anymore.
BucheOnBoard schrieb:

with 2.2m (7 ft 3 in) edge length and 60°,
Although that can be confusing again.
But you can clearly see the approx. 45 degrees on the sketch.
It’s just that you don’t always have the drawings right in front of you when they were posted a few pages earlier.
H
hanghaus2023
20 Oct 2023 13:03
This is one way to move a bit away from the beech tree.

Site plan of a house with garden area and gardening work; plot size 681 m² (7329 sq ft)


Does the existing house have a basement?
K a t j a20 Oct 2023 15:01
BucheOnBoard schrieb:

The attic will definitely be finished (both floor and walls) and insulated.
Oh, why is that? You mean you’re planning to fully finish it, even if there are cheaper and more spacious rooms on the upper floor? You’d rather give up the rooms upstairs? Honestly, that sounds like some kind of idealized wish that’ll probably be regretted after three months of climbing stairs. But of course, the builder is always king.
Y
ypg
20 Oct 2023 19:46
BucheOnBoard schrieb:

As far as I know, I never mentioned 60°.
BucheOnBoard schrieb:

The current one has 60°, and the fairy-tale cottage vibe definitely makes it feel very cozy.

I confused it with the current roof 😎
K a t j a schrieb:

Would you rather skip the rooms on the upper floor?

Well, the original poster wants a bit more than just a 1-meter (3 ft) knee wall. Since only one full story is allowed, they are giving up some space in the attic (not to be confused with the loft or roof space). Also, I recall that they find a room in the loft quite nice or cozy. Not every homebuilder has to prefer a town villa and straight walls.

For some, this loft room is a comfort space, a nice-to-have, a reason to build again. This may not apply to the original poster, but you don’t have to understand everything when someone has different priorities in building.

That said, I admit I would plan more carefully than just cutting off the attic bluntly.
I might actually design an open space so that the upper-level internal corridor feels attractive and airy, creating a highlight. Or at the back, an extension (living room or dining) could create an angle for a terrace.

However, I am also a fan of using the attic as living space, for example like this
Bright attic bedroom with white metal bed, pink bedding, and large triangular windows.

Bright attic room with white metal bed, pink bedding, and window overlooking greenery.
K a t j a20 Oct 2023 20:27
Basically, everyone does as they please. However, in my experience, such rooms are a bit of a luxury if you don’t actually need them. Who voluntarily wants to live on three floors? The attic quickly turns into a storage space for model trains or something similar. In this case, you’re also incurring additional costs, which could be better spent on creating more functional rooms elsewhere.

That’s pretty crazy. But who isn’t, right? 😉

The location of the stairs also encourages an open layout in this case. With two children, it’s manageable, and you get used to it.
K a t j a20 Oct 2023 21:14
ypg schrieb:

However, I am also a fan of using the attic as living space, for example like this

I really don’t want to spoil anyone’s dream home, but it only looks nice in the pictures. In reality, it’s a pain to bump your head every time you get in or out of bed because of the sloped ceiling. Dormers are not allowed, so you end up with a full-on headache on both sides. 😉