ᐅ Installation of a Gas Heating System in New Construction 2023/2024

One must distinguish between media presentation and professional discourse.

It was already established in the field of developmental research before the lockdowns that lockdowns would be harmful to children.

Most people are not even aware of how poor science communication is through mainstream media.

This has nothing to do with the publishers, but with the fact that you can count the competent science journalists in Germany on one hand, without needing all the fingers.

Then MayLab or the Gates-funded Hirschhausen come along and exploit people’s trust by talking about "science" and "facts." These claims are then "verified" by fact-checkers like Faktenfuchs or Volksverpetzer.

Before criticizing the world, those mentioned above should be banned permanently. Many people I know said back then that they preferred to believe them, and now they realize they were only lied to. Whether it was intentional or not doesn’t matter to me; that is only relevant for the courts.

Bookstar87 schrieb:

Before criticizing the world, one should first ban the above-mentioned permanently.

Weren't you advocating for freedom of speech just two posts ago?

Putting that aside, MaiLab has explained and demonstrated how science works—as a method for gaining knowledge. You won’t find that in newspapers—mostly because journalists don’t have that skill. In Germany, if you want to learn about this, traditional media won’t provide it.

Of course, you have to start with the realization that you yourself need to learn more...

By the way, you can look up the raw data from the PEI online without any other media filtering it for you. Of course, you have to do the calculations yourself.

Most people can’t properly find the PEI numbers by just googling. If out of 1000 side effects only 70 are reported and then 4 are mentioned, nobody asks where the other cases went….

Regarding newspapers and who was first, the research was not thorough:
After the phrase #the green swamp trended on Twitter for days and weeks, more and more mainstream media reluctantly reported on it, and now the topic was also taken up by the opposition party, public broadcasters followed with a report on the clan-like structures.

The pressure became too great. That’s how it works nowadays.

Regarding the 20% interested in investigating the corona issue: unfortunately, there is no real pressure behind it.

Snowy36 schrieb:

Regarding the 20% interested in COVID investigations: unfortunately, there is no real pressure behind it.

I see this differently: there are groups that want an investigation where the outcome is already predetermined. Take a look at our @Bookstar87: he already knows exactly what happened, how, and who did what and why. It was even reported in “Die Welt.” Now the official investigation just has to confirm that. Otherwise, it will just prove once again how we are all being deceived.

Anyone who is open-minded needs to get access to as much raw data as possible, think independently, and consider various perspectives. And only then should they reflect on their own position – because among the incorrect views, your own can also be included.

Snowy36 schrieb:

Most people are unable to even google the PEI numbers properly.

And among those who can, some are unable to put absolute figures into relative context. But whose responsibility is that?

Do the lateral thinkers here maybe want to start a post-Corona discussion thread?
That way, they don’t have to bring up their issues in every thread that has nothing to do with it.
You are also welcome to send them to me via PM; I will keep them safe for you.
I would be very grateful for that!