ᐅ Installation of a Gas Heating System in New Construction 2023/2024

Created on: 11 Apr 2023 14:47
R
robert0815
Hello fellow home builders,

we have started constructing a single-family house. The approved building permit / planning permission includes a gas heating system, which we still want to install.

There are two possible scenarios:

1. What happens if the heating system is installed in October 2023, but the house is only inspected and approved in February 2024?

2. What happens if the heating system is installed in January 2024, and the house is inspected and approved in May 2024?

Both options are difficult to plan for. So far, we do not know whether the construction schedule might be delayed.
I haven't found any information on this. Do you have any further details?

Regards,
robert0815
S
sysrun80
29 Apr 2023 23:09
No, I think it’s the spoken dialects in the regions. Bavarian just comes across like a pesticide.

Otherwise, I recommend reading about the difference between correlation and causation.
KingJulien29 Apr 2023 23:15
Bausparfuchs schrieb:

Even I consider such statements to be nonsense.

Then don’t call it chemtrails, but contrails, like any normal person. You know exactly that the word refers to what I described.

So you just wanted to say that clouds affect the warming/cooling of the Earth’s surface.
And that flying increases climate warming.
I wouldn’t exactly stop the presses for that insight.

And wind turbines... there’s always something.
What is your proposal for generating electrical energy in the future?
KingJulien29 Apr 2023 23:19
sysrun80 schrieb:

No, I think it’s the spoken dialect in those regions. Bavarian dialect also feels like a pesticide.
Well, I won’t allow that now!
That’s federal racism :p
S
sysrun80
29 Apr 2023 23:26
KingJulien schrieb:

Well, I absolutely refuse that now!
That’s federal racism :p

I suppose one should still be allowed to say that 😉
C
chand1986
29 Apr 2023 23:36
Bookstar87 schrieb:
The topic "effectiveness of mask mandates" has definitely been disproven; the measure was useless like almost all the others.
No! Nothing has been disproven at all. That is a belief based on information where, after being filtered through the media from the original sources, only nonsense remains—as is usually the case with filtering. This is like Trump’s America here: alternative facts.
C
chand1986
29 Apr 2023 23:40
Bausparfuchs schrieb:

So we are talking about 0.04 percent CO². Of this amount, 4 percent is human-made.
No! The increase from 280 ppm to 415 ppm is about 50%, not 4%.

This is not difficult math. Everything is emitted by humans.