Hello,
Matter is about to launch, and it already looks very promising that the standard will establish itself in the long term and replace the older systems (especially the isolated solutions).
My question is: Which smart lights would you recommend for Matter?
Lights: complete lamps, bulbs, light strips, etc.
Matter mainly relies on the wireless standard Thread, but Wi-Fi and other wireless standards can also be integrated via bridges.
The largest and best-known provider is Philips Hue. However, Philips Hue has already announced that they will continue to use Zigbee and do not plan to incorporate Thread. Matter compatibility will be achieved through the Hue Bridge.
Which lamps would you recommend?
Would you use Philips Hue despite Zigbee and work with two wireless standards (Zigbee for the lamps and the rest with Thread)?
For light switches, I like the Eve Light Switch (wireless standard Thread). Alternatively, you could also use Friends of Hue switches or standard Zigbee light switches.
Matter is about to launch, and it already looks very promising that the standard will establish itself in the long term and replace the older systems (especially the isolated solutions).
My question is: Which smart lights would you recommend for Matter?
Lights: complete lamps, bulbs, light strips, etc.
Matter mainly relies on the wireless standard Thread, but Wi-Fi and other wireless standards can also be integrated via bridges.
The largest and best-known provider is Philips Hue. However, Philips Hue has already announced that they will continue to use Zigbee and do not plan to incorporate Thread. Matter compatibility will be achieved through the Hue Bridge.
Which lamps would you recommend?
Would you use Philips Hue despite Zigbee and work with two wireless standards (Zigbee for the lamps and the rest with Thread)?
For light switches, I like the Eve Light Switch (wireless standard Thread). Alternatively, you could also use Friends of Hue switches or standard Zigbee light switches.
F
FrankChief17 Nov 2022 07:07Isn't it the same with Loxone, where the wireless technology is only meant to serve as an extension?
With Loxone, the problem is that everything is connected to the Miniserver; if it fails, nothing works anymore.
With Loxone, the problem is that everything is connected to the Miniserver; if it fails, nothing works anymore.
FrankChief schrieb:
Isn’t it the case with Loxone that the wireless technology is only meant to serve as an extension?
With Loxone, the problem is that everything is connected to the Miniserver, so if it fails, nothing works anymore. It’s the same with a heating system, and that’s really inconvenient, just like any other control system.
I’m not aware of any hardware failures of Miniservers; even the SD card can be replaced within minutes if you have a backup of your system.
And if the LAN port gets damaged, you should probably reconsider your home wiring.
If a 16-channel actuator in KNX fails, the system goes dark; if the power supply fails, same thing; if someone shorts the bus, the system also goes dark...
Not necessarily—in the case of Geiger motors, for example, they are only available as wireless devices, but of course, wired connections are always preferable.
If the KNX server fails, many functions still work.
If an actuator fails, everything else still operates.
Those who are cautious can also use redundant power supplies.
Loxone does have its place for inexperienced DIYers and users who prefer a simple, colorful interface.
You seem to be exactly that target group. The problem is that you think Loxone is better or more innovative.
This is simply not the case.
If an actuator fails, everything else still operates.
Those who are cautious can also use redundant power supplies.
Loxone does have its place for inexperienced DIYers and users who prefer a simple, colorful interface.
You seem to be exactly that target group. The problem is that you think Loxone is better or more innovative.
This is simply not the case.
You are certainly allowed to do so. However, this is due to your lack of knowledge and is not based on facts.
I get the feeling that you chose Loxone, invested a lot, and now have to present it as the best option.
The only advantage is in the easier "programmability" combined with more limited capabilities.
This makes it easier for the majority to use.
I get the feeling that you chose Loxone, invested a lot, and now have to present it as the best option.
The only advantage is in the easier "programmability" combined with more limited capabilities.
This makes it easier for the majority to use.