ᐅ General contractor, customer service, and communication extremely frustrating

Created on: 6 May 2022 16:50
F
Fleckenzwerg
In December 2020, we signed a turnkey contract for a single-family house with a regional general contractor. Due to site development and other delays, construction only started in November 2021. Even before that, we noticed that communication was very slow. Questions went unanswered for ages; scheduled phone appointments were simply missed, and so on. When we finally managed to have a phone call, we expressed our frustration clearly but always politely and professionally. Our general contractor explained everything with too much work, constantly changing schedules because of company XY, and of course, COVID-19. From his perspective, our questions were not important. That might be true to some extent, but for us, it is impossible to know, since the schedule and who is supposed to do what when remain completely unclear. On the other hand, it is reasonable to expect answers to questions about a high six-figure project within a reasonable time. Our impression is that he simply doesn’t care and basically says: “That’s how it is, deal with it.”

As a side note: So far, there is nothing to complain about the work itself; even our independent construction supervisor has no objections. However, there are still frequent questions and occasional requests for changes (recessed spotlights, sliding doors, things like that). When it takes 3 to 4 weeks to get a response — mind you, just any kind of response, not even an answer — the frustration grows enormously. We asked for a list of subcontractors; this was promised again two months ago after several reminders, but we still haven’t received it. We have questions about the further schedule, when the house will be ready to move in — we’ve long stopped believing in the contractually guaranteed construction period; the standard excuse is COVID-19. We just want to know what the realistic timeline is. No sign of life for three weeks now. Two phone appointments were scheduled since then but simply passed without cancellation, rescheduling, or any comment. We have no idea when it might be finished, because the entire interior finishing still needs to be done. The fact that we also need to plan ourselves — vacations (for our own work such as painting), terminating the rental contract, and so on — are again things that, from the general contractor’s point of view, are not important. But they are important to us. Without wanting to sound arrogant, we are the CLIENTS and have paid everything fully and on time so far, so I expect my questions to be answered.

We understand that everyone’s order books are overfull and many companies probably don’t even know how to manage everything anymore. But is this kind of behavior really the standard in the construction industry now? How do you deal with people or companies like this?
11ant7 May 2022 13:23
Neubau2022 schrieb:

For our trades, we can make last-minute changes as long as they do not affect the building permit / planning permission or structural engineering. [...] Any additional costs will then be invoiced directly to us by the trade.

Some homeowners may find this practical, but legally it is actually questionable: both parties bypass their respective original contract partners in such a "short-circuit" arrangement. Formally, consent should be obtained from at least one of them, but often they receive no notification for their records. This is the root cause of discrepancies between the contract, delivery note, invoice, acceptance, and ultimately warranty obligations. Later, a general contractor (GC) is expected to take responsibility for something that the contractor and subcontractor agreed on directly with each other. Legally, the homeowner is a "third party" who, even if pragmatically considered the "beneficial owner" of the entire project, is "unauthorized" to issue a contract modification termination between the contractor and subcontractor. While lawyer-homeowners tend to avoid disputes privately, those acting as GCs who deal with legal specialists or senior school administrators quickly learn not to accept, tolerate, or even encourage such "shortcuts."

A GC today should ideally give every homeowner a checkbook containing three checks for change requests; if returned unused, a discount applies, and each additional change costs an extra one thousand (or even two thousand) besides the actual change expenses—especially if the related construction phase has already started. Apparently, this is the only way to encourage unruly clients to behave like responsible business adults ;-)
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
N
NatureSys
7 May 2022 15:59
And if you want someone you can almost always call, it is best to build with an architect. If they are also the construction manager, they are on-site every day and have included answering questions in their fee.
Y
ypg
7 May 2022 17:18
NatureSys schrieb:

And if someone wants a person they can almost always call, it’s best to build with an architect. If they are also very involved in construction management, they will be on site every day and have answering questions included in their fee.
There is a lot of truth in that: when you build with an architect, you get full-service all-inclusive rather than just turnkey. When you build with a general contractor, you do not get all-inclusive!
N
Neubau2022
7 May 2022 17:23
ypg schrieb:

There is a lot of truth in that: building with an architect means full-service all-inclusive rather than turnkey. Building with a general contractor means no all-inclusive service!

However, the financial risk of working with an architect should not be overlooked. Architects can do everything except accurate cost estimation. If the budget is already tight, it is easy to miscalculate when working with an architect.
F
fromthisplace
7 May 2022 17:25
I cannot share that experience. We are also building with a local general contractor. We can easily reach our site manager both by phone and email. For decisions that could go either way, he provides feedback when he deems it appropriate or stays out of it when necessary. Any work that has to be done differently than planned is explained thoroughly and clearly, so we feel well informed even with minor changes to the plans.
Y
ypg
7 May 2022 17:36
Neubau2022 schrieb:

However, you should not overlook the financial risk when working with an architect.
Exactly. But clients often confuse the term turnkey or “all-in-one” with an exclusive service.