Hello everyone,
we are building a KfW 40 house with a Viessmann Vitocal 200-S heat pump and an 8 kW photovoltaic system.
The heat pump is also capable of cooling. The upgrade would cost 1000 € (only the heating installer, thermostats extra).
Is it generally worthwhile to cool using the heat pump? Just because it can does not necessarily mean it is practical.
How fast does a room cool down? Underfloor heating systems are usually quite slow in response.
Or does it make more sense to invest in an air conditioning system and operate it with the photovoltaic system on hot days?
Thanks and best regards
Markus254
we are building a KfW 40 house with a Viessmann Vitocal 200-S heat pump and an 8 kW photovoltaic system.
The heat pump is also capable of cooling. The upgrade would cost 1000 € (only the heating installer, thermostats extra).
Is it generally worthwhile to cool using the heat pump? Just because it can does not necessarily mean it is practical.
How fast does a room cool down? Underfloor heating systems are usually quite slow in response.
Or does it make more sense to invest in an air conditioning system and operate it with the photovoltaic system on hot days?
Thanks and best regards
Markus254
S
Strahleman23 Apr 2021 20:04nordanney schrieb:
Nice, but nothing more. I agree. A heat pump only lowers the temperature slightly during longer heat waves if the heating surface is not also designed optimally for cooling. This usually means concrete core activation in the concrete ceilings.
i_b_n_a_n schrieb:
A gentle breeze can already be enough to keep the temperature “bearable” 😎
Sure, an air conditioner is more powerful, but it is purely electric cooling.
A ground-source heat pump can potentially do this without extra electricity! through PC (passive cooling) We find summer especially unbearable with high temperatures combined with high humidity. Whether it is a ground-source heat pump or an air-to-water heat pump, the humidity, which ultimately causes the muggy and uncomfortable feeling, is not reduced. Only an air conditioner can do that. Cooling with a heat pump is nice but not comparable to an air conditioning unit. I gladly accept electric cooling, which is at least partly powered by a photovoltaic system. The cooling effect is much greater.
In addition, during transitional periods when underfloor heating does not run continuously because it is still too warm during the day, the air conditioner provides suitable heating for early autumn evenings.
N
nordanney23 Apr 2021 20:36T_im_Norden schrieb:
if you call the same device an air conditioner and it coolsIt is also not sufficient to just change the name if the functionality of an air conditioner (i.e., producing cold air) is not present.Where air conditioning units are mentioned, I have an additional question: Does the outdoor unit have to be installed outside, or is it possible to install it somewhere else, for example, on a (cold) attic? However, I assume there could be issues with humidity if it is not properly ventilated.
Because attic temperatures can sometimes reach sauna-like levels in summer, the coefficient of performance (COP) drops drastically, causing the system to consume unnecessarily more electricity than needed. So, if you want an efficient system, it must be installed outside or the heat exchanger on the attic must be freely ventilated with outside air.
That is not true. They are all essentially the same systems. However, heat pumps used for underfloor heating are not allowed to cool down as much as the same devices that directly cool the air. There are small differences in the design and software that set certain limits.
But every heat pump used for heating can also be used for cooling, and every so-called “air conditioner,” which is often frowned upon and almost booed if mentioned, can just as easily be converted into a heat pump for underfloor heating.
Marketing and advertising slogans are just that. One is strongly rejected by customers while the other is eagerly accepted. Underneath the casing, both are the same system.
nordanney schrieb:
It is not enough just to rename it if the function of an air conditioner (i.e., producing cooling) is not present.
That is not true. They are all essentially the same systems. However, heat pumps used for underfloor heating are not allowed to cool down as much as the same devices that directly cool the air. There are small differences in the design and software that set certain limits.
But every heat pump used for heating can also be used for cooling, and every so-called “air conditioner,” which is often frowned upon and almost booed if mentioned, can just as easily be converted into a heat pump for underfloor heating.
Marketing and advertising slogans are just that. One is strongly rejected by customers while the other is eagerly accepted. Underneath the casing, both are the same system.
N
nordanney23 Apr 2021 21:02Mycraft schrieb:
That’s not correct. They are all the same systems.Then I must have expressed myself poorly. Due to its application, the heat pump cannot operate as an air conditioner. Technically, they are both the same and, of course, closely related to the refrigerator. There you can clearly see what happens with strong cooling – condensation. That’s why underfloor heating only works “semi-optimally” ;-)Similar topics