ᐅ Ventilated rainscreen facade instead of ETICS (external thermal insulation composite system)?

Created on: 17 Oct 2016 19:17
D
DasLamm
Hello,

has anyone had a ventilated rainscreen facade (VHF) installed on their house?

So far, a traditional external thermal insulation composite system (ETICS) was planned (for an older building), but I have never been particularly enthusiastic about it (especially not with EPS insulation). Ventilated facades are said to offer many advantages, mainly in terms of building physics and design possibilities. However, of course, they come at a significantly higher cost (we are still waiting for a detailed quote in our case).

A large part of the additional cost seems to come from the necessary substructure and the actual facade cladding. Although I could also live with a classic plaster facade, I simply find the overall construction much "cleaner" (meaning the separation of the insulation layer from the weather protection layer or cladding).

Does anyone have concrete experience, especially regarding the extra costs? How about DIY work? Could something like the substructure be done by oneself?

Some of the companies that provided quotes for an ETICS locally mentioned that this is very rarely done in the private sector due to the high costs, with ETICS being almost the standard. Is that really the case? I personally only know of one case with a VHF (new build, wood cladding). Perhaps there are also only a few contractors who can offer this professionally. I don’t think every painter/plasterer can do it properly...
A
alterego134
15 Mar 2021 19:29
Gladly! Unfortunately, I am not able to send private messages yet, but can you send one to me? I would appreciate it!
K1300S15 Mar 2021 19:42
No, it is always bilateral. Whoever can send can also receive—or not.
K1300S15 Mar 2021 19:48
But never mind. For a 100 m² (1,076 sq ft) facade, the exterior plaster would cost about 8,500. A curtain wall façade made of aluminum (Prefa) would have cost around 15,000, plus about 2,000 for a substructure on masonry. This substructure would have been unnecessary if switching to timber frame construction, although the pure wall costs were the same.
A
alterego134
15 Mar 2021 19:52
Hmm, a factor of 2. Quite significant...
What year is your project from?
K1300S15 Mar 2021 19:54
2021 🙂
A
alterego134
15 Mar 2021 20:02
K1300S schrieb:

2021 🙂

Ah, that long ago already? Those were the days...
Jokes aside, that’s quite reasonable for the ETICS, at least compared to the quotes my uncle recently got for insulating his single-family home. His prices per square meter were significantly higher for insulation with EPS, without any particularly complex building structure. Must be because of the Munich area 😉