ᐅ Bungalow Floor Plan Up to 140 m² – Are the Dimensions According to Standards Acceptable?
Created on: 27 Jul 2018 17:14
A
Ala34
Development plan/restrictions: no development plan, §34 surroundings, semi-detached house, bungalow, etc.
Plot size: 1056 m² (11,363 sq ft)
Slope: no
Residential area
Number of parking spaces: 2
Roof style: hipped roof
Architectural style: classic bungalow
Orientation: east-south
Maximum heights/limits: -
Client requirements
Architectural style, roof type, building type: country house style, bungalow, hipped roof
Basement, stories: no basement, single story
Number of people: 2, 35 years old
Room requirements: 4 rooms
Office: home office
Guest sleepers per year: 2–4
Open or closed layout: open
Conservative or modern construction: modern
Open kitchen, kitchen island: yes
Number of dining seats: 2
Fireplace: yes
Balcony, roof terrace: no
Garage, carport: yes
Utility garden, greenhouse: yes
House design
Planning origin: do-it-yourself / Scanhaus Marlow Marlow
What do you particularly like? Why? Covered terrace, open space, private area
What do you dislike? Why? small utility room
Cost estimate according to architect/planner: 270,000 €
Personal price limit for the house, including fittings: 300,000 €, 350,000 € including additional costs
Preferred heating technology: geothermal heat pump with deep drilling
Uninterrupted view from front door into garden with French doors
What is the most important/basic question about the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
Floor plan is liked, are dimensions according to standards okay? Is the open space structurally feasible? Layout okay? Living area should be max. 140 m² (1,507 sq ft), which was challenging with 4 rooms.
Thanks in advance.
Plot size: 1056 m² (11,363 sq ft)
Slope: no
Residential area
Number of parking spaces: 2
Roof style: hipped roof
Architectural style: classic bungalow
Orientation: east-south
Maximum heights/limits: -
Client requirements
Architectural style, roof type, building type: country house style, bungalow, hipped roof
Basement, stories: no basement, single story
Number of people: 2, 35 years old
Room requirements: 4 rooms
Office: home office
Guest sleepers per year: 2–4
Open or closed layout: open
Conservative or modern construction: modern
Open kitchen, kitchen island: yes
Number of dining seats: 2
Fireplace: yes
Balcony, roof terrace: no
Garage, carport: yes
Utility garden, greenhouse: yes
House design
Planning origin: do-it-yourself / Scanhaus Marlow Marlow
What do you particularly like? Why? Covered terrace, open space, private area
What do you dislike? Why? small utility room
Cost estimate according to architect/planner: 270,000 €
Personal price limit for the house, including fittings: 300,000 €, 350,000 € including additional costs
Preferred heating technology: geothermal heat pump with deep drilling
Uninterrupted view from front door into garden with French doors
What is the most important/basic question about the floor plan summarized in 130 characters?
Floor plan is liked, are dimensions according to standards okay? Is the open space structurally feasible? Layout okay? Living area should be max. 140 m² (1,507 sq ft), which was challenging with 4 rooms.
Thanks in advance.
Ala34 schrieb:
Floor plan adjusted. It seems that the newcomers are developing the bad habit of relying too much on Katja’s PDF conversion service :-(
Ala34 schrieb:
We leave the wall thicknesses to the architects. Or to the structural engineer – which makes sense when it comes to dimensioning and graphical representation. However, in practice, you should still account for the walls by subtracting their thicknesses, both for floor areas and passage dimensions. As a rough rule of thumb, use 20cm (8 inches) for interior walls and double that for exterior walls; that way, you get a practical calculation for general house planning.
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Ala34 schrieb:
Floor plan adjusted. I don’t see any changes except that the desks have been rearranged. Hard to tell if 2mm (0.08 inches) were added anywhere.
Off-topic: The software looks a lot like Architekt 3D. Try selecting manual dimensioning in the top left corner and enter the distances between the narrow spots.
And while we’re at it, switch to the 3D view and walk through the bathroom. How does it feel? Just cramped and claustrophobic, right? I would remove the T-shaped element. Better to have a nice corner bathtub, etc.
Similar for the laundry room. If the technical equipment is to be installed there, I think 6m² (65ft²) is lifelong torture.
It’s best not to upload images as PDFs; only a few people can read those. JPG or PNG are preferable.
Tina mit K29 Jul 2018 08:39ypg schrieb:
What does Scanhaus Marlow Marlow say about changing the floor plan? As far as I know, they charge a lot for every window and any wall adjustment. Changing the exterior walls is not possible. Or is it allowed now?We are also currently planning with Scanhaus Marlow Marlow, and changing the exterior walls is not possible. We are still considering adding an extra window in the kitchen and I’m curious about the additional cost. We haven’t had the construction meeting with the architect yet. If it’s too expensive, I think we can manage without the extra window.
I find this angled wall between the bathroom and the office unnecessary—actually, quite impractical—especially with the desks rearranged: if the wall were straight, there would be more space in the bathroom. The filing cabinet could be placed against the wall next to the toilet, and if the door were moved slightly more to the left side of the plan, then a filing cabinet could fit along the entire wall.
Can someone please clarify what the two rooms on the right side of the plan are intended for? I believe one is a technical room, but what about the other? A guest room with two beds??? Or storage? Storage space would definitely be needed.
Additionally, I would add a door before the private area; then the sliding door between the dressing room and bedroom could be removed (since you can sneak from the bedroom to the bathroom undetected while naked) and that would free up an extra meter of wardrobe space. Possibly, swapping the bedroom and dressing room could be considered; this would likely improve the noise situation in the bedroom. Alternatively, the bedroom could be placed where the bathroom is (unfortunately no north arrow is visible), with the bathroom facing south. Personally, I would prefer a bathroom filled with natural light over the bedroom.
Overall, I find the private area could be optimized significantly. But first, that absurd angled wall has to go—it unnecessarily reduces the size of the bathroom while providing no added benefit to the office.
Can someone please clarify what the two rooms on the right side of the plan are intended for? I believe one is a technical room, but what about the other? A guest room with two beds??? Or storage? Storage space would definitely be needed.
Additionally, I would add a door before the private area; then the sliding door between the dressing room and bedroom could be removed (since you can sneak from the bedroom to the bathroom undetected while naked) and that would free up an extra meter of wardrobe space. Possibly, swapping the bedroom and dressing room could be considered; this would likely improve the noise situation in the bedroom. Alternatively, the bedroom could be placed where the bathroom is (unfortunately no north arrow is visible), with the bathroom facing south. Personally, I would prefer a bathroom filled with natural light over the bedroom.
Overall, I find the private area could be optimized significantly. But first, that absurd angled wall has to go—it unnecessarily reduces the size of the bathroom while providing no added benefit to the office.
Similar topics