ᐅ Experiences with Ground Source Heat Pumps

Created on: 23 Oct 2015 21:40
S
Saruss
Hello,
here I would like to share some experiences and data regarding my brine heat pump and deep drilling, based in part on the expert’s "questionnaire":

a) What is the soil composition on your property?
Up to 3m (10 feet) silty, fine sandy, clayey soil
Up to 4m (13 feet) slope debris, rock fragments
Then bedrock (mainly limestone)

b) How deep was the drilling?
Drilled twice to a depth of 72m (236 feet)

c) How much did the drilling cost?
€10,400 including double U-probes DN25
Grouting material with 2.0 W/mK thermal conductivity
Permitting process (building permit / planning permission)
Pressure-tight house entry at the basement and underground routing of supply lines (about 25m (82 feet))
Filling/draining equipment, filling, pressure testing, etc. (all inclusive)

d) How much did the system cost?
System: Tecalor TTc 05 with heating output at B0/W35 of 5.8 kW and coefficient of performance (COP) of 4.8
Cost: €9,800

e) Were there any difficulties during installation, if so, what kind?
Because the water used to flush out the drilled material during drilling seeped away, a "small compressor" was needed to blow it out with air. However, it had to be placed on a neighbor’s property who had not yet started building. The machine was the size and approximate weight of a 20-ton truck but was off-road capable. This caused a 2-day delay because the compressor first had to be transported to our site. No additional costs were charged.

f) How is the daily operation?
"Like a refrigerator." Once the parameters on the heating system are correctly set, the only thing that should be done is occasionally reading the information/data such as operating hours and source temperature. Otherwise, it runs "on its own," just like any heating system. When the door is closed, the unit is virtually inaudible. Very discreet since, apart from the cabinet in the utility room, nothing else is visible (all brine pipes are underground).

e) What are the operating costs for which living area?
Currently, a living area of 180sqm (1937 sqft) is heated, plus an additional 65sqm (700 sqft) of cellar space within the insulated thermal envelope (these rooms are around 15-16°C (59-61°F) on the coldest days). From September 2014 to September 2015, 2,000 kWh of electricity was consumed for heating and hot water (2 adults, 1 baby, 1 toddler). The house is a KfW-70 standard building according to the 2009 energy saving regulations, which already met the required technical standards before the central ventilation system with enthalpy heat exchanger was installed (we decided to add this after the initial applications).

f) to be continued ....

Note regarding the comparison of the coefficient of performance (COP):
Since optimizing the heating curve and settings at the end of last year, the system has had a COP of about 5.5. Operating hours are around 1200; the deep borehole was drilled approximately 20% deeper than initially recommended by the companies, at our own request.
B
Baumfachmann
15 Feb 2018 22:28
The length of the pipe is 90% decisive, as is the water exchange in the boiler.
S
Saruss
15 Feb 2018 22:33
If you dig something up, you should write more than just a meaningless half sentence, or haven’t you noticed that before?
B
Bookstar
18 Mar 2018 22:31
DerUnbeugsame schrieb:
Hello everyone, I have been a happy homeowner for one year now with a Novelan S/W heat pump, 2x 99.5m (326.8 feet) probes, and a 9.2 kWp photovoltaic system, and since then I have had zero heating or electricity costs. On the one hand, I’m amazed at what is already possible today, and on the other hand, I’m equally shocked at how much companies mislead you through ignorance and the obstacles the government and energy providers put in your way.

Best regards
The technology is impressive, and I understand why you are happy not to pay for heating and electricity anymore. However, you have already made very large upfront investments that effectively prepay your energy costs for at least the next 35 years. No business would do this, as it is highly uneconomical.
F
Fuchur
18 Mar 2018 23:17
From your perspective, what could be more economical than an investment that is fully refinanced after 10-15 years and then yields a 10% cash return per year?
S
Saruss
18 Mar 2018 23:44
Bookstar schrieb:
The technology is great, and I understand that you are happy not to pay for heating and electricity anymore. However, you have already made very large upfront investments that cover at least the next 35 years. No business would do that; it is highly uneconomical.

I would now like to see factual information explaining why it is about 35 years. To me, this just looks like trolling without any factual basis.
@Fuchur: Likewise, I would appreciate information regarding your response—how you arrive at a period of 10–15 years and a 10% return. With such a high yield, more people would surely be doing this.
F
Fuchur
18 Mar 2018 23:51
A very simple example calculation:

10 kWp costs approximately 12,000 euros.
Assuming an annual production of 9,000 kWh,
with a feed-in tariff of 12.5 cents, this results in revenue of 1,125 euros.

Self-consumption increases the yield, while taxes and similar factors reduce it. Just a quick rough estimate. Of course, more details are involved in the detailed planning.