ᐅ City villa with straight staircase, open modern design, 1,500 sq ft (140 m²)
Created on: 9 Mar 2018 10:49
S
saddi
Hello everyone,
We recently got lucky and found a suitable plot of land where we can realize our dream of building our own home. For this, we made the compromise to move a bit further out of the city in order to build a detached single-family house on a cul-de-sac in a new development area.
We signed the purchase contract for the land last week. The financing is also settled. We have already chosen a prefab house supplier (Luxhaus) and have discussed the initial plans with them. The next step was to work with our architect to find the right floor plan and then to submit the building permit / planning permission application. Our architect has implemented our ideas very well, and we are really happy with the floor plan. Still, the opinions of other homeowners are very important to us.
We would therefore like to hear your thoughts
Here are the key details:
The plot is 416m² (4,476 sq ft) in size. We want to build a house without a basement in the city villa style. The ground floor is about 71m² (764 sq ft), the upper floor about 66m² (710 sq ft). The house will stand at the end of a cul-de-sac with an open southwest-facing view over fields. The main entrance is on the side.
Very important to us are a straight staircase, a gallery on the upper floor, and a large dining and living area with a kitchen island. Since we enjoy cooking a lot, the kitchen should become the heart of the home. At the moment, there are just two of us, but we plan to grow in the next 1–2 years (our wish is for two healthy children).
We are already close to our budget limit with the current plan, so no major (expensive) changes are possible. The current floor plan basically meets our wishes, but with such a big project, it’s normal to have some uncertainty about whether everything has been considered.
What is causing us some concern:
Otherwise, we are very satisfied overall. We know that by having a straight staircase and a gallery upstairs, we lose some possible options, but this is very important to us, and we definitely want to keep it. Our budget is fully allocated with the current planning, and we do not want to go over it.
But maybe some of you have useful ideas, suggestions, or constructive criticism. We are very open and look forward to your help
Thanks so much in advance!



We recently got lucky and found a suitable plot of land where we can realize our dream of building our own home. For this, we made the compromise to move a bit further out of the city in order to build a detached single-family house on a cul-de-sac in a new development area.
We signed the purchase contract for the land last week. The financing is also settled. We have already chosen a prefab house supplier (Luxhaus) and have discussed the initial plans with them. The next step was to work with our architect to find the right floor plan and then to submit the building permit / planning permission application. Our architect has implemented our ideas very well, and we are really happy with the floor plan. Still, the opinions of other homeowners are very important to us.
We would therefore like to hear your thoughts
Here are the key details:
The plot is 416m² (4,476 sq ft) in size. We want to build a house without a basement in the city villa style. The ground floor is about 71m² (764 sq ft), the upper floor about 66m² (710 sq ft). The house will stand at the end of a cul-de-sac with an open southwest-facing view over fields. The main entrance is on the side.
Very important to us are a straight staircase, a gallery on the upper floor, and a large dining and living area with a kitchen island. Since we enjoy cooking a lot, the kitchen should become the heart of the home. At the moment, there are just two of us, but we plan to grow in the next 1–2 years (our wish is for two healthy children).
We are already close to our budget limit with the current plan, so no major (expensive) changes are possible. The current floor plan basically meets our wishes, but with such a big project, it’s normal to have some uncertainty about whether everything has been considered.
What is causing us some concern:
- Too little storage space? We want to use the space under the stairs for pantry storage as well as some kitchen appliances (blender, ice cream maker, etc.). Beverage crates and household equipment (vacuum cleaner, cleaning supplies) would also go into the pantry and utility room. Items only used occasionally (Christmas decorations, carnival costumes, suitcases, etc.) would be stored in the small attic. Are we being too optimistic with this?
- Is the hallway width on the ground floor sufficient? According to the plan, it will be about 90–100cm (35–39 inches) wide. Since we prefer an open concept and the kitchen already begins halfway into the hallway, this should be fine?
- We would like a somewhat larger cloakroom. Currently, the small one would suffice, but with children or many guests, it might get tight. However, we plan to possibly add a small cabinet in the office room that could be used for storage. For everyday use, should the planned cloakroom be enough?
- On the upper floor, we will probably remove the door between the dressing room and bathroom. This would allow us to place a 3-meter (10-foot) wardrobe along the longer side of the dressing room. On the other side, we want to put a small chest of drawers so it doesn’t feel too cramped.
- The bathroom on the upper floor is relatively small, basically the minimum size. We are not really the spa type. In our current rental, we have only used the bathtub twice in six years. We could do without a bathtub, but considering our hope to have children in the future, we will certainly need to include one in the planning.
Otherwise, we are very satisfied overall. We know that by having a straight staircase and a gallery upstairs, we lose some possible options, but this is very important to us, and we definitely want to keep it. Our budget is fully allocated with the current planning, and we do not want to go over it.
But maybe some of you have useful ideas, suggestions, or constructive criticism. We are very open and look forward to your help
Thanks so much in advance!
If you want to make the house significantly smarter with simple means, extend the floor plan’s projection through to the upper floor. This looks much more intentional than that protruding bay window. I would revise the window arrangement: the garden side seems to confuse “harmonious” with “completely uninspired.”
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
I also find the room layout very well done, except for the entrance area, which is too narrow. However, this has already been discussed. A bathroom of 8m² (86 square feet) can work. I don’t think the layout is bad either, but the shower would need to be fully glazed—meaning no tiled wall and a door in front of it. Otherwise, the space feels too confined. I would also reconsider the second door. It might be practical, but it takes away wall space in both the bathroom and the dressing room. Additionally, it can be difficult to know if someone is in the bathroom, and locking two doors regularly is annoying.
From the outside, I’m not really a fan of the offset, and the house looks relatively plain. However, this could definitely be improved with paint or other facade elements to add some character and prevent it from looking too sterile.
PS: Regarding the living area, it might actually make sense to replace one or two floor-to-ceiling windows with more usable wall space.
From the outside, I’m not really a fan of the offset, and the house looks relatively plain. However, this could definitely be improved with paint or other facade elements to add some character and prevent it from looking too sterile.
PS: Regarding the living area, it might actually make sense to replace one or two floor-to-ceiling windows with more usable wall space.
86bibo schrieb:
I would also consider the second door. It might be practical in some ways, but it takes up wall space in the bathroom and dressing room. In addition, it can be difficult to know who is currently in the bathroom, and always having to lock two doors can be annoying. I would remove the third door. Who would be in the bathroom: Rumpelstiltskin or the Virgin Mary? – most likely just a family member. If someone doesn’t want to be disturbed, they can simply knock. Those who lock bathroom doors often leave graffiti on toilet cubicle doors (and probably don’t have a plumber among their friends).
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
I find this really, really difficult. At first glance, the floor plan looks nice, and the general layout is common and proven.
But I also think the house is somewhat deceptive. It seems as if all the typical desires and what is currently mainstream (no negative meaning intended) have been squeezed into the house, but in real life, many areas feel uncomfortably tight: guest toilet, hallway, cloakroom, living room, dressing room, and bathroom. This has already been discussed. The only areas with a showroom feel are the straight staircase and the kitchen, although the staircase loses its character when it is partially enclosed to create storage space, and the island is about 80cm (31 inches) wide, but over 220cm (87 inches) or 240cm (94 inches) long.
What should be changed now? Where can space be saved to gain more elsewhere?
Remove the dressing room and make the bathroom larger. That’s doable.
However, I believe the staircase would benefit from one or even two turns. In houses under 10 meters (33 feet) wide, this type of staircase does not serve the house well. Just think about how much space is wasted upstairs in the hallway. A different staircase could mean 2 x 3 meters (6.5 x 10 feet) of wardrobe space in the desired dressing room and a bathroom where even four people can feel comfortable.
Then a kitchen that isn’t larger than the living room... An island of 90 x 180cm (35 x 71 inches) is also nice and possibly more suitable, allowing more depth for the dining table.
A study with about 8 sqm (86 sq ft) of floor space can also accommodate guests; however, I would leave enough space behind a door to fit a built-in closet there too.
The ground floor design reminds me a bit of the Jette house from Viebrockhaus, which offers a larger area but which I find just as unsuccessful.
But I also think the house is somewhat deceptive. It seems as if all the typical desires and what is currently mainstream (no negative meaning intended) have been squeezed into the house, but in real life, many areas feel uncomfortably tight: guest toilet, hallway, cloakroom, living room, dressing room, and bathroom. This has already been discussed. The only areas with a showroom feel are the straight staircase and the kitchen, although the staircase loses its character when it is partially enclosed to create storage space, and the island is about 80cm (31 inches) wide, but over 220cm (87 inches) or 240cm (94 inches) long.
What should be changed now? Where can space be saved to gain more elsewhere?
Remove the dressing room and make the bathroom larger. That’s doable.
However, I believe the staircase would benefit from one or even two turns. In houses under 10 meters (33 feet) wide, this type of staircase does not serve the house well. Just think about how much space is wasted upstairs in the hallway. A different staircase could mean 2 x 3 meters (6.5 x 10 feet) of wardrobe space in the desired dressing room and a bathroom where even four people can feel comfortable.
Then a kitchen that isn’t larger than the living room... An island of 90 x 180cm (35 x 71 inches) is also nice and possibly more suitable, allowing more depth for the dining table.
A study with about 8 sqm (86 sq ft) of floor space can also accommodate guests; however, I would leave enough space behind a door to fit a built-in closet there too.
The ground floor design reminds me a bit of the Jette house from Viebrockhaus, which offers a larger area but which I find just as unsuccessful.
ypg schrieb:
But I also think the house is largely deceptive packaging.True. Ultimately, everything is just barely working. You could shower on the ground floor, but only just. You could wash laundry in the utility room, but not more than three underwear items; in the cloakroom, two jackets and two pairs of shoes fit, and then it gets tight, and so on.Who wants to live so squeezed?
ypg schrieb:
The only thing that has a showroom character is the straight staircase ...To me, the staircase is the ugliest feature of the entire house.
1. It is apparently only 90cm (35 inches) wide. Once you add a railing, it narrows to about 80cm (31 inches) – barely workable again...
2. It's walled in – you only have a narrow tunnel where no one can pass coming the other way.
3. It starts right behind the front door. When you enter, you almost trip up the steps.
4. It dominates the entire floor plan, forcing cramped living and wasting the already limited square meters.
I’ve never found a straight staircase sensible in floor plans under 170m² (1,830 sq ft). There we have it again.
11ant schrieb:
Those who finish bathrooms also write spontaneous sayings on toilet doors (and probably don’t have a plumber among their friends). Haha, I only just noticed now, it seems an autocorrect went off: of course, it should be "sanitär" ter (plumber).
https://www.instagram.com/11antgmxde/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/bauen-jetzt/
Similar topics