ᐅ Staircase – Are stair dimensions of 2.00 x 2.00 meters acceptable?
Created on: 7 Sep 2017 14:25
Z
Zaba12
Hello everyone,
since I noticed the topic about stair dimensions in another thread and have been uncertain for a few weeks whether the stair measurements are acceptable, I’m bringing it here for discussion.
My only experience is with the stairs at my parents’ house, which are 2.30m x 1.65m (7 ft 7 in x 5 ft 5 in) and, in my opinion, comfortable to use.
Attached is the image with the measurements provided by the architect. The stairwell dimensions are exactly 2m x 2m (6 ft 7 in x 6 ft 7 in).
What do you think?
since I noticed the topic about stair dimensions in another thread and have been uncertain for a few weeks whether the stair measurements are acceptable, I’m bringing it here for discussion.
My only experience is with the stairs at my parents’ house, which are 2.30m x 1.65m (7 ft 7 in x 5 ft 5 in) and, in my opinion, comfortable to use.
Attached is the image with the measurements provided by the architect. The stairwell dimensions are exactly 2m x 2m (6 ft 7 in x 6 ft 7 in).
What do you think?
The picture shows a landing staircase. The floor plan includes a small half-turn staircase. According to the 1x1 staircase rule, a depth of about 2.80 m (9 ft 2 in) would be needed. I don’t see where the additional 80 cm (31 inches) could fit without reducing the size of the other rooms, especially upstairs.
I would still advise you to reconsider your future staircase. A size of 2m by 2m (6.6ft by 6.6ft) seems far too small to me. The actual walking width might end up being only 75–80cm (30–31.5 inches). I would recommend checking carefully what the staircase builder says and can deliver. Especially try to see it in person if possible!
Taking 40cm (16 inches) from the kitchen and the study might hurt less than having this narrow staircase forever.
Taking 40cm (16 inches) from the kitchen and the study might hurt less than having this narrow staircase forever.
40cm (15.7 inches) less kitchen space wouldn't bother me, but the room upstairs will be the second children's bedroom. Therefore, I wouldn't want to take away that one more square meter from the room now. If it’s a standard steel/wood construction, the effective width without a handrail on the wall should be around 95cm (37.4 inches) per side, right?
Our rough construction dimension was 2.26 cm (0.9 inches) in width. Unfortunately, I don’t have the finished step dimension or the exact width of the stairwell opening on hand, but maybe losing a few centimeters (inches) could be acceptable.
By the way, personally (very subjective!) I prefer walking on this type of staircase over a staircase with a landing—I just don’t really like the interruption of the walking rhythm caused by the landing and the deliberate change of direction. But of course, everyone should try it out for themselves.
Edit: Don’t forget the stairwell opening—or at least start thinking about how it should look later, where and how the railing will be attached (inside the opening or mounted on the steps?), and what space will be occupied by the handrail!
By the way, personally (very subjective!) I prefer walking on this type of staircase over a staircase with a landing—I just don’t really like the interruption of the walking rhythm caused by the landing and the deliberate change of direction. But of course, everyone should try it out for themselves.
Edit: Don’t forget the stairwell opening—or at least start thinking about how it should look later, where and how the railing will be attached (inside the opening or mounted on the steps?), and what space will be occupied by the handrail!
Zaba12 schrieb:
If it’s a standard steel/wood construction, the effective width without a handrail on the wall should be about 95cm (37 inches) per side, right?Or not. Then the handrail will rub against the next supports.
Have you ever tried to lift furniture up through a “felt” narrow width? I prefer real measurements, not just perceived ones [emoji23]
Similar topics